Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T02:04:28.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Purchasing popular purebreds: investigating the influence of breed-type on the pre-purchase motivations and behaviour of dog owners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

RMA Packer ,
D Murphy  and
MJ Farnworth
RMA Packer*
Affiliation:
Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
D Murphy
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK
MJ Farnworth
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: rpacker@rvc.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How and why dog owners select a specific breed may impact upon the health of the dog they acquire, and upon the wider health of the breed they select. Brachycephalic breeds are rapidly increasing in popularity despite increasing evidence linking brachycephalism with chronic and severe health conditions. This study used a questionnaire to explore pre-, during and post-purchase behaviours and attitudes of dog-owners who own popular brachycephalic dog breeds (n = 3 breeds) compared to popular non-brachycephalic dog breeds (n = 7 breeds). The survey received 1,427 valid responses. Brachycephalic breed owners were younger, more likely to live with children, and to be buying their chosen breed for the first time. The factor that most highly influenced brachycephalic owners’ decisions to buy their breed was appearance, followed by breed size suited to lifestyle, good dog breed for children and good companion breed. Perceived health of the breed was less influential in decision-making for brachycephalic owners compared to non-brachycephalic owners. The way in which owners acquired their dog differed by breed type, with brachycephalic owners more likely to use puppyselling websites to find their dog, less likely to see either parent of their puppy, and less likely to ask to see any health records. Despite many brachycephalic breed health issues being directly related to conformation, appearance remains the most significant determinant in why people desire these breeds. More targeted educational interventions are needed to change buyer attitudes and, if ineffective, other more direct mechanisms (eg legislation) may be required to protect canine welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarebrachycephaliccompanion animalinherited disorderspedigreepet ownership
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 191 - 201
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

All-Party Parliamentary Group on Animal Welfare 2010 http://www.apgaw.org/data/sites/1/PDFs/a-healthier-future-for-pedigree-dogs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Asher, L, Buckland, E, Phylactopoulos, CL, Whiting, M, Abeyesinghe, S and Wathes, C 2011 Estimation of the number and demographics of companion dogs in the UK. BMC Veterinary Research 7: 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asher, L, Diesel, G, Summers, JF, McGreevy, PD and Collins, LM 2009 Inherited defects in pedigree dogs Part 1: Disorders related to breed standards. The Veterinary Journal 182:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, A, Martin, V, Bidoli, E, Steigmeier-Raith, S, Brühschwein, A, Reese, S, Köstlin, R and Erhard, M 2015 Brachycephalic problems of pugs relevant to animal welfare. Animal Welfare 24: 327–333. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P 2010 Independent Inquiry into Dog Breeding. http://breedinginquiry.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/final-dog-inquiry-120110.pdfGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y and Hochberg, Y 1995 Controlling the false dis-covery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57: 289–300Google Scholar
Farrow, T, Keown, AJ and Farnworth, MJ 2014 An explo-ration of attitudes towards pedigree dogs and their disorders as expressed by a sample of companion animal veterinarians in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 62: 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.902340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghirlanda, S, Acerbi, A and Herzog, H 2014 Dog movie stars and dog breed popularity: a case study in media influence on choice. PLoS ONE: 9(9): e106565. https://doi.org/10.1371/j our-nal.pone.0106565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirlanda, S, Acerbi, A, Herzog, H and Serpell, JA 2013 Fashion vs. function in cultural evolution: The case of dog breed popularity. PLoS ONE 8: e74770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074770CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyder, J, Warriner, K and Miller, S 2002 Evaluating socio-economic status (SES) bias in survey nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics 18(1): 1–11Google Scholar
Herzog, HA 2006 Forty-two thousand and one Dalmatians: Fads, social contagion and dog breed popularity. Society & Animals 14:383–398. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006778882448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, HA, Bentley, RA and Hahn, MW 2004 Random drift and large shifts in popularity of dog breeds. Proceedings of The Royal Society B271: S353-356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, T, Marston, LC and Bennett, PC 2009 Describing the ideal Australian companion dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, N-C, Adams, VJ, Kalmar, L, Ladlow, JF and Sargan, DR 2016 Whole-body barometric plethysmography characterises upper airway obstruction in 3 brachycephalic breeds of dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 30: 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenz, K 1971 From Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume II. Methuen & Co Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, PD and Nicholas, FW 1999 Some practical solutions to welfare problems in dog breeding. Animal Welfare 8: 329–341Google Scholar
Monnet, E 2008 Brachycephalic airway syndrome (CVC Proceedings). http://veterinarycalendar.dvm360.com/avhc/Medicine/Brachyceph alic-airway-syndrome-Proceedings/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/587147Google Scholar
Murray, JK, Browne, WJ, Roberts, MA, Whitmarsh, A and Gruffydd-Jones, TJ 2010 Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the UK. Veterinary Record 166: 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noller, C, Hueber, JP, Aupperle, H, Seeger, J, Oechtering, TH, Niestrock, C and Oechtering, GU 2008 New aspects of brachycephalia in dogs and cats. Basics: insights into embryology, anatomy and pathophysiology. Proceedings of the 26th American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Conference. 4-7 June 2008, San Antonio, Texas. http://www.vin.com/apputil/content/default-adv1.aspx?pId=11262&catId=32595&id=3865696&ind=772&objT ypeID=17Google Scholar
O’Neill, DG, Church, DB, McGreevy, PD, Thomson, PC and Brodbelt, DC 2014 Prevalence of disorders recorded in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England. PLoS ONE 9: e90501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, DG, Jackson, C, Guy, JH, Church, DB, McGreevy, PD, Thomson, PC and Brodbelt, DC 2015 Epidemiological associations between brachycephaly and upper respiratory tract disorders in dogs attending veterinary practices in England. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology 2: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-015-0023-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, RS 1996 Animal selection and breeding techniques that cre-ate diseased populations and compromise welfare. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208: 1969–1974Google Scholar
Packer, RMA, Hendricks, A and Burn, CC 2012 Do dog own-ers recognise clinical signs related to a conformational inherited disorder that is ‘normal for the breed’? A potential constraint to improving canine welfare. Animal Welfare 21(S1): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, RMA, Hendricks, A and Burn, CC 2014 Conference Report: Building Better Brachycephalics pp 1–36. 11 November 2013, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, UK. http://www.ufaw.org.uk/downloads/welfare-downloads/building-better-brachycephalics-2013-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Packer, RMA, Hendricks, A and Burn, CC 2015b Impact of facial conformation on canine health: Corneal ulceration. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0123827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Packer, RMA, Hendricks, A, Tivers, MS and Burn, CC 2015a Impact of facial conformation on canine health: Brachycephalic Obstructive Airway Syndrome. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0137496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pup Aid 2016 Where's mum? http://www.pupaid.org/wheresmum/Google Scholar
Rooney, NJ and Sargan, DR 2010 Welfare concerns associated with pedigree dog breeding in the UK. Animal Welfare 19: 133–140Google Scholar
RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) 2013 Born to suffer. http://www.rspca.org.uk/get-involved/campaigns/companion/dogwelfare/borntosufferGoogle Scholar
RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) 2016 Puppy information pack http://puppycontract.rspca.org.uk/webContent/staticImages/Micr osites/PuppyContract/Downloads/PuppyContractDownload.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sax, LJ, Gilmartin, SK and Bryant, AN 2003 Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education 44: 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870Google Scholar
Serpell, JA 2002 Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection-beyond the ‘Cute Response’. Society and Animals 10:437–454. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853002320936926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, JF, Diesel, G, Asher, L, McGreevy, PD and Collins, LM 2010 Inherited defects in pedigree dogs Part 2: Disorders that are not related to breed standards. The Veterinary Journal 183: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teng, KT, McGreevy, PD, Toribio, JLML and Dhand, NK 2016 Trends in popularity of some morphological traits of pure-bred dogs in Australia. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology 3: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-016-0032-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Kennel Club 2015 Meet Britain's surprising new pedigree dog breed – the Jack Russell terrier. http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/press-releases/2015/october/meet-britain%E2%80%99s-surprising-new-pedigree-dog-breed-%E2%80%93-the-jack-russell-terrier/Google Scholar
The Kennel Club 2016a Breed registration statistics. http://www.theken-nelclub.org.uk/registration/breed-registrationstatisticsGoogle Scholar
The Kennel Club 2016b Bulldog breed standard. http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.a spx?id=4084Google Scholar
The Kennel Club 2016c French Bulldog breed standard. http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.a spx?id=4088Google Scholar
The Kennel Club 2016d Pug breed standard. http://www.theken-nelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.aspx?id=6164Google Scholar
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW) 2016 Genetic Welfare Problems of Companion Animals. http://www.ufaw.org.uk/genetic-welfare-problems-intro/genetic-welfare-problems-of-companion-animals-introGoogle Scholar