Skip to main content
×
Home

Effect of genetic group and feed system on locomotion score, clinical lameness and hoof disorders of pasture-based Holstein–Friesian cows

  • G. Olmos (a1) (a2), L. Boyle (a1), B. Horan (a1), D. P. Berry (a1), P. O’Connor (a1), J. F. Mee (a1) and A. Hanlon (a2)...
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the genetic group of the Holstein–Friesian (HF) and pasture-based feeding system (3 × 2 factorial arrangement) on locomotion score (six gait aspects scored from one to five), clinical lameness and hoof disorders within a seasonal calving milk production system. The three genetic groups compared had an average Economic Breeding Index (EBI) value of 40, 70 and 80: representing the Irish national average genetic merit (LOW-NA), high EBI genetic merit of North American ancestry (HIGH-NA) and high EBI genetic merit of New Zealand ancestry (HIGH-NZ), respectively. Two feed systems were compared: a high grass allowance, low-concentrate system typical of spring-calving herds in Ireland (control) and a high-concentrate system. Data from 126 cows collected across a complete lactation period were analysed using generalised estimating equations and survival analysis. Genetic group of HF had a significant effect on locomotion score, clinical lameness and hoof disorders. Higher EBI cows (HIGH-NA and HIGH-NZ) had lower hazard of poor locomotion score in some gait aspects (e.g. spine curvature) and lower odds of clinical lameness in the first 200 days post-calving (Odds ratios 0.08 and 0.24, respectively, relative to the LOW-NA) and some hoof disorders (e.g. traumatic lesions) compared with LOW-NA cows. The high-concentrate feed system showed a higher incidence and severity of digital dermatitis (P < 0.01). Thus, high EBI cows have better locomotion, fewer cases of clinical lameness and less-severe hoof disorders (i.e. digital dermatitis, white line disease and traumatic lesions) than low EBI cows. These findings have important implications for cow welfare and productivity.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Effect of genetic group and feed system on locomotion score, clinical lameness and hoof disorders of pasture-based Holstein–Friesian cows
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Effect of genetic group and feed system on locomotion score, clinical lameness and hoof disorders of pasture-based Holstein–Friesian cows
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Effect of genetic group and feed system on locomotion score, clinical lameness and hoof disorders of pasture-based Holstein–Friesian cows
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: Gabriela.olmos@teagasc.ie
References
Hide All
Amstel S, Shearer J 2006. Manual for treatment and control of lameness in cattle. Blackwell, Oxford.
Arkins S 1981. Lameness in dairy cows. Irish Veterinary Journal 35, 135141 and 63–170.
Bergsten C 2001. Effects of conformation and management system on hoof and leg diseases and lameness in dairy cows. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 17, 123.
Berry DP, Buckley F, Dillon P, Evans RD, Veerkamp RF 2004. Genetic relationships among linear type traits, milk yield, body weight, fertility and somatic cell count in primiparous dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 43, 161176.
Berry DP, Shalloo L, Cromie AR, Veerkamp RF, Dillon P, Amer PR, Kearney JF, Evans RD and Wickham B 2007. The economic breeding index: a generation on. Technical Report to the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation.
Boelling D, Pollott GE 1998. Locomotion, lameness, hoof and leg traits in cattle I. – Phenotypic influences and relationships. Livestock Production Science 54, 193203.
Boelling D, Madsen P, Jensen J 2001. Genetic parameters of foot and leg traits in future AI bulls. II. Correlation to body conformation traits in daughters. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A 51, 122128.
Booth CJ, Warnich LD, Gröhn YT, Maison DO, Guard CL, Janssen D 2004. Effect of lameness on culling in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 41154122.
Chesterton RN, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS, Tanner CM 1989. Environmental and behavioural factors affecting the prevalence of foot lameness in New Zealand dairy herds a case-control study. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 37, 135142.
Clarkson MJ, Downham WB, Faull WB, Hughes JW, Manson FJ, Merritt JB, Murray RD, Russell WB, Sutherst JE, Ward WR 1996. Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 138, 563567.
Cook NB, Nordlund KV, Oetzel GR 2004. Environmental influences on claw horn lesions associated with laminits and subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, E36E46.
Emanuelson U 1998. Recording of production diseases in cattle and possibilities for genetic improvements: a review. Livestock Production Science 20, 89106.
Esslemont RJ and Kossaibati MA 2001. The costs of poor fertility and disease in UK dairy herds, trends in DAISY herds over 10 seasons. In DAISY research report (ed. Invervet), p. 108, UK.
Fatehi J, Stella A, Shannon JJ, Boettcher PJ 2003. Genetic parameters for feet and leg traits evaluated in different environments. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 661666.
Green LE, Hedges VJ, Schukken YH, Blowey RW, Packington AJ 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 22502256.
Greenough PR, Vermunt JJ 1991. Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors. The Veterinary Record 128, 1117.
Harris DJ, Hibburt CD, Anderson GA, Younis PJ, Fitspatrick DH, Dunn AC, Parson IW, McBeath NR 1988. The incidence, cost and factors associated with foot lameness in dairy cattle in South-Western Victoria. Australian Veterinary Journal 65, 171176.
Hirst WM, Murray RD, Ward WR, French NP 2002. Generalised additive models in hierarchical logistic regression of lameness in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 55, 3746.
Jones WP, Hansen LB, Chester-Jones H 1994. Response of health care to selection for milk yield of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 31373152.
Lischer ChJ, Ossent M, Räber M, Geyer H 2002. Suspensory structures and supporting tissues of the third phalanx of cows and their relevance to the development of typical sole ulcers (Rusterholz ulcers). The Veterinary Record 151, 694698.
Logue DN, Offer JE, Kempson SA 1993. Lameness in dairy cattle. Irish Veterinary Journal 46, 4758.
Margerison JK 2004. A review of dairy heifer rearing and its effects on heifer performance, longevity, rearing costs and farm income. In Dairying, using science to meet consumers’ needs (ed. E Kebreab, JAN Mills and DE Beever), pp. 135. Nottingham University Press, United Kingdom.
McCarthy S, Berry DP, Dillon P, Rath M, Horan B 2007. Influence of Holstein–Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 18591869.
Mülling CKW and Lischer CJ 2002. New aspects on etilogy and pathogenesis of laminitis in cattle. In XXII World Buiatrics Congress, Hanover, Germany, pp. 236–247.
Nocek JE 1997. Bovine acidosis: implications on laminits. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 10051028.
O’Callaghan KA, Cripps PJ, Downham DY, Murray RD 2003. Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Welfare 12, 605610.
Politiek RD, Distl O, Fjeldaas T, Heeres J, McDaniel BT, Nielsen E, Peterse DJ, Reurink A, Strandberg P 1986. Importance of claw quality in cattle: review and recommendations to achieve genetic improvement. Report of the EAAP working group on “claw quality in cattle”. Livestock Production Science 15, 133152.
Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56, 1533.
Rogers GW 1996. Using type for improving health of the udder and feet and legs. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle (ed. INTERBULL), Bulletin 12, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 33–41.
SAS Institute 2006. User’s guide version 9.1 statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Smilie RH, Hoblet KH, Eastridge ML, Weiss WP, Schnitkey GL, Moeschberger ML 1999. Subclinical laminitis in dairy cows: use of severity of hood lesions to rank and evaluate herds. Veterinary Record 144, 1721.
Somers JGCJ, Schouten WGP, Frankena K, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Metz JHM 2005. Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cow kept on different floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 110120.
Sprencher DJS, Hostetler DE, Kaneene JB 1997. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 47, 11791187.
Tranter WP, Morris RS 1991. A case study of lameness in three dairy herds. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 39, 8896.
Uribe HA, Kennedy BW, Martin SW, Kelton DF 1995. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 421430.
van der Waaij EH, Holzhauer M, Ellen E, Kamphuis C, de Jong G 2005. Genetic parameters for claw disorders in Dutch dairy cattle and correlations with conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 36723678.
Van Dorp TE, Boettcher P, Shaeffer LR 2004. Genetics of locomotion. Livestock Production Science 90, 247253.
Veerkamp RF, Dillon P, Kelly E, Cromie AR, Groen AF 2002. Dairy cattle breeding objectives combining yield, survival and calving interval for pasture-based systems in Ireland under different milk quota scenarios. Livestock Production Science 76, 137151.
Westwood CT, Bramley E, Lean IJ 2003. Review of the relationship between nutrition and lameness in pasture-fed dairy cattle. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 51, 208218.
Winckler C, Willen S 2001. The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A 51, 103107.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 87 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 144 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.