Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:18:03.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of ewes grazing sulla or ryegrass pasture for different daily durations on forage intake, milk production and fatty acid composition of cheese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2016

A. Bonanno*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
A. Di Grigoli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
F. Mazza
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
C. De Pasquale
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
C. Giosuè
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
F. Vitale
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
M. Alabiso
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Sulla (Sulla coronarium L.) forage is valued for its positive impact on ruminant production, in part due to its moderate content of condensed tannin (CT). The duration of daily grazing is a factor affecting the feed intake and milk production of ewes. In this study, the effects of grazing sulla pasture compared with annual ryegrass, and the extension of grazing from 8 to 22 h/day, were evaluated with regard to ewe forage intake and milk production, as well as the physicochemical properties and fatty acid (FA) composition of cheese. During 42 days in the spring, 28 ewes of the Comisana breed were divided into four groups (S8, S22, R8 and R22) that grazed sulla (S) or ryegrass (R) for 8 (0800 to 1600 h) or 22 h/day, and received no feeding supplement. In six cheese-making sessions, cheeses were manufactured from the 48 h bulk milk of each group. Compared with ewes grazing ryegrass, those grazing sulla had higher dry matter (DM) intake, intake rate and milk yield, and produced milk that was lower in fat and higher in casein. Ewes grazing for 22 h spent more time eating, which reduced the intake rate, increased DM and nutrient intake and milk yield, and reduced milk fat. Due to the ability of CT to inhibit the complete ruminal biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), the FA composition of sulla cheese was more beneficial for consumer health compared with ryegrass cheese, having lower levels of saturated fatty acids and higher levels of PUFA and n-3 FA. The FA profile of S8 cheese was better than that of S22 cheese, as it was higher in branched-chain FA, monounsaturated FA, PUFA, rumenic acid (c9,t11-C18:2), and had a greater health-promoting index. The effect of short grazing time on sulla was attributed to major inhibition of PUFA biohydrogenating ruminal bacteria, presumably stimulated by the higher accumulation of sulla CT in the rumen, which is related to a higher intake rate over a shorter eating time. Thus, grazing sulla improved the performance of ewes, thereby increasing, especially with short grazing time, the nutritional properties of cheese fat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avondo, M, Bonanno, A, Pagano, RI, Valenti, B, Di Grigoli, A, Alicata, ML, Galofaro, V and Pennisi, P 2008. Milk quality as affected by grazing time of day in Mediterranean goats. Journal of Dairy Research 75, 4854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, DE and Griinari, JM 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 23, 203227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, DE, Mather, IH, Wall, RJ and Lock, AL 2006. Major advances associated with the biosynthesis of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 12351243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, A, Di Grigoli, A, Di Trana, A, Di Gregorio, P, Tornambè, G, Bellina, V, Claps, S, Maggio, G and Todaro, M 2013a. Influence of fresh forage-based diets and αS1-casein (CSN1S1) genotype on nutrient intake and productive, metabolic, and hormonal responses in milking goats. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 21072117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonanno, A, Di Grigoli, A, Montalbano, M, Bellina, V, Mazza, F and Todaro, M 2013b. Effects of diet on casein and fatty acid profiles of milk from goats differing in genotype for αS1-casein synthesis. European Food Research and Technology 237, 951963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, A, Di Grigoli, A, Vargetto, D, Tornambè, G, Di Miceli, G and Giambalvo, D 2007. Grazing sulla and/or ryegrass forage for 8 or 24 hours daily. Effects on ewes feeding behaviour. In Permanent and temporary grassland plant, environment and economy (ed. A De Vliegher and L Carlier), pp. 208211. European Grassland Federation, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
Bonanno, A, Di Miceli, G, Di Grigoli, A, Frenda, AS, Tornambè, G, Giambalvo, D and Amato, G 2011. Effects of feeding green forage of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) on lamb growth, gastrointestinal nematode infection, and carcass and meat quality. Animal 5, 148154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabiddu, A, Decandia, M, Addis, M, Piredda, G, Pirisi, A and Molle, G 2005. Managing Mediterranean pastures in order to enhance the level of beneficial fatty acids in sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 59, 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabiddu, A, Molle, G, Decandia, M, Spada, S, Fiori, M, Piredda, G and Addis, M 2009. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep. Part 2: effects on milk fatty acid profile. Livestock Science 123, 230240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S, Bobe, G, Zimmerman, S, Hammond, EG, Luhman, CM, Boylston, TD, Freeman, AE and Beitz, DC 2004. Physical and sensory properties of dairy products from cows with various milk fatty acid compositions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 34223428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2007. Diet rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 828855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corl, BA, Baumgard, LH, Dwyer, DA, Griinari, JM, Phillips, BS and Bauman, DE 2001. The role of Δ9-desaturase in the production of cis-9 trans-11 CLA. Journal of Nutrition Biochemistry 12, 622630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, RJ, Shingfield, KJ, Lee, MRF and Scollan, ND 2006. Increasing the concentrations of beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk produced by dairy cows in high-forage systems. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 168206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Trana, A, Bonanno, A, Cecchini, S, Giorgio, D, Di Grigoli, A and Claps, S 2015. Effects of Sulla forage (Sulla coronarium L.) on the oxidative status and milk polyphenol content in goats. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H and Mayes, RW 1991. Use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 913952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Meuret, M, Boissy, A and Petit, M 2001. Le pâturage vu par l’animal: mécanismes comportementaux et applications en élevage. Fourrages 166, 213238.Google Scholar
Harvey, A, Parsons, AJ, Rook, AJ, Penning, PD and Orr, RJ 2000. Dietary preference of sheep for perennial ryegrass and white clover at contrasting sward surface heights. Grass and Forage Science 55, 242252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, GR, Mantecon, AR, Sim, DA, Gonzalez, J, Foreman, E, Bermudez, FF and Elston, DA 1999. Can grazing sheep compensate for a daily foraging time constraint? Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 8793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, TC, Wallace, RJ, Moate, PJ and Mosley, EE 2008. Board-invited review: recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. Journal of Animal Science 86, 397412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, JK, Cruz-Hernandez, C, Deng, Z, Zhou, J, Jahreis, G and Dugan, ME 2004. Analysis of conjugated linoleic acid and trans 18:1 isomers in synthetic and animal products. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79, 1137S1145S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, S, Silanikove, N, Nitsan, Z, Barkai, D, Baram, H, Provenza, PD and Perevolotsky, A 2000. Short-term changes in eating patterns explain the effects of condensed tannins of feed intake in heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69, 199213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MRF and Tweed, JKS 2008. Isomerisation of cis-9 trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) to trans-9 trans-11 CLA during acidic methylation can be avoided by a rapid base catalysed methylation of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Research 75, 354356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luna, P, de la Fuente, MA and Juárez, M 2005. Conjugated linoleic acid in processed cheeses during the manufacturing stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, 26902695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Min, BR, Barry, TN, Attwood, GT and McNabb, WC 2003. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants feed fresh temperate forages: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 106, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molle, G, Decandia, M, Fois, N, Ligios, S, Cabiddu, A and Sitzia, M 2003. The performance of Mediterranean dairy sheep given access to sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) pastures in different time proportions. Small Ruminant Research 49, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molle, G, Decandia, M, Giovannetti, V, Cabiddu, A, Fois, N and Sitzia, M 2009. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep. Part 1: effects on feeding behaviour intake diet digestibility and performance. Livestock Science 123, 138146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, L 2010. Dairy products and plasma cholesterol levels. Food & Nutrition Research 54, 5124, doi:103402/fnr.v54i0.5124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, RJ, Penning, PD, Rutter, SM, Champion, RA, Harvey, A and Rook, AJ 2001. Intake rate during meals and meal duration for sheep in different hunger states grazing grass or white clover swards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, PW 2009. Milk fat nutrition. In Dairy fats and related products (ed. AY Tamime), pp. 2851. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piluzza, G, Sulas, L and Bullitta, S 2014. Tannins in forage plants and their role in animal husbandry and environmental sustainability: a review. Grass and Forage Science 69, 3248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, LJ, Hrstick, LN and Chan, BG 1986. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyniadin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25, 223230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, DL, Sendalo, DSC, Owen, E, Mtenga, LA, Penning, PD, Mayes, RW and Hendy, CRC 1996. Effects of tethering management on feed intake and behaviour of Tanzanian goats. Small Ruminant Research 19, 113120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruisi, P, Siragusa, M, Di Giorgio, G, Graziano, D, Amato, G, Carimi, F and Giambalvo, D 2011. Pheno-morphological agronomic and genetic diversity among natural populations of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) collected in Sicily, Italy. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58, 245257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhija, PS and Palmquist, DL 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 36, 12021206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM and Dewhurst, RJ 2006. Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 389417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar