Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Effects of fermentable starch and straw-enriched housing on energy partitioning of growing pigs

  • J. E. Bolhuis (a1), H. van den Brand (a1), S. T. M. Staals (a2), T. Zandstra (a3), S. J. J. Alferink (a3), M. J. W. Heetkamp (a1) and W. J. J. Gerrits (a3)...
Abstract

Both dietary fermentable carbohydrates and the availability of straw bedding potentially affect activity patterns and energy utilisation in pigs. The present study aimed to investigate the combined effects of straw bedding and fermentable carbohydrates (native potato starch) on energy partitioning in growing pigs. In a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, 16 groups of 12 pigs (approximately 25 kg) were assigned to either barren housing or housing on straw bedding, and to native or pregelatinised potato starch included in the diet. Pigs were fed at approximately 2.5 times maintenance. Nitrogen and energy balances were measured per group during a 7-day experimental period, which was preceded by a 30-day adaptation period. Heat production and physical activity were measured during 9-min intervals. The availability of straw bedding increased both metabolisable energy (ME) intake and total heat production (P < 0.001). Housing conditions did not affect total energy retention, but pigs on straw bedding retained more energy as protein (P < 0.01) and less as fat (P < 0.05) than barren-housed pigs. Average daily gain (P < 0.001), ME intake (P < 0.001) and energy retention (P < 0.01) were lower in pigs on the native potato starch diet compared to those on the pregelatinised potato starch diet. Pigs on the pregelatinised potato starch diet showed larger fluctuations in heat production and respiration quotient over the 24-h cycle than pigs on the native potato starch diet, and a higher activity-related energy expenditure. The effect of dietary starch type on activity-related heat production depended, however, on housing type (P < 0.05). In barren housing, activity-related heat production was less affected by starch type (16.1% and 13.7% of total heat production on the pregelatinised and native potato starch diet, respectively) than in straw-enriched housing (21.1% and 15.0% of the total heat production on the pregelatinised and native potato starch diet, respectively). In conclusion, the present study shows that the availability both of straw bedding and of dietary starch type, fermentable or digestible, affects energy utilisation and physical activity of pigs. The effects of housing condition on protein and fat deposition suggest that environmental enrichment with long straw may result in leaner pigs. The lower energy expenditure on the physical activity of pigs on the native potato starch diet, which was the most obvious in straw-housed pigs, likely reflects a decrease in foraging behaviour related to a more gradual supply of energy from fermentation processes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Effects of fermentable starch and straw-enriched housing on energy partitioning of growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Effects of fermentable starch and straw-enriched housing on energy partitioning of growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Effects of fermentable starch and straw-enriched housing on energy partitioning of growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: Liesbeth.Bolhuis@wur.nl
References
Hide All
Achour L, Flourié B, Briet F, Franchisseur C, Bornet F, Champ M, Ramboud JC, Messing B 1997. Metabolic effects of digestible and partially indigestible cornstarch: a study in the absorptive and post absorptive periods in healthy humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 11511159.
ARC 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.
Asp NG, Van Amelsfoort JMM, Hautvast JGAJ 1996. Nutritional implications of resistant starch. Nutrition Research Reviews 9, 131.
Awati A, Bosch MW, Tagliapietra F, Williams BA, Verstegen MWA 2006. Difference in in vitro fermentability of four carbohydrates and two diets, using ileal and faecal inocula from unweaned piglets. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 573582.
Beattie VE, Walker N, Sneddon IA 1995. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Animal Welfare 4, 207220.
Beattie VE, O’Connell NE, Kilpatrick DJ, Moss BW 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on welfare-related behavioural and physiological parameters in growing pigs. Animal Science 70, 443450.
Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM 2005. Behavioural development of pigs with different coping characteristics in barren and substrate-enriched housing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 213228.
Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM 2006. Effects of rearing and housing environment on pigs with different coping characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 6885.
Bolhuis JE, van den Brand H, Staals S, Gerrits WJJ 2007. Effects of pregelatinized vs. native potato starch on intestinal weight and stomach lesions of pigs housed in barren pens or on straw bedding. Livestock Science 109, 108110.
Brouwer E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy metabolism (ed. KL Blaxter), pp. 441443. Academic Press, London, UK.
Canh TT, Sutton AL, Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA, Schrama JW, Bakker GCM 1998. Dietary carbohydrates alter the faecal composition and pH and the ammonia emission from slurry of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 18871895.
De Lange C, Van Milgen J, Dubois S, Noblet J 2006. Energy cost of ingesting and excreting indigestible material in growing pigs is minimal. Animal Research 55, 551562.
De Leeuw JA, Jongbloed AW, Spoolder HAM, Verstegen MWA 2005. Effects of hindgut fermentation of nonstarch polysaccharides on the stability of blood glucose and insulin levels and physical activity in empty sows. Livestock Production Science 96, 165174.
Filer LJR, Andersen DW, Cotton RH 1986. Effect of dietary fiber on growing pigs. In Swine in biomedical research (ed. ME Tumbleson), vol. 2, pp. 701708. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Fraser DF, Phillips PA, Thompson BK, Tennessen T 1991. Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 307318.
Gerrits WJJ, Rijnen MJA, Bolhuis JE, Schrama JW 2003. Influences of dietary fibre on physical activity and behaviour, and on its energy value for growing pigs. In Perspectives in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, M Varley and B Kemp), pp. 474490. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
Giusi-Perier A, Fiszlewicz M, Rérat A 1989. Influence of diet composition on intestinal volatile fatty acid and nutrient absorption in unanaesthetized pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 386402.
Haralampu SG 2000. Resistant starch – a review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3. Carbohydrate Polymers 41, 285292.
Heetkamp MJW, Schrama JW, De Jong L, Swinkels JWGM, Schouten WGP, Bosch MW 1995. Energy metabolism in young pigs as affected by mixing. Journal of Animal Science 73, 35623569.
Heijnen ML, Beynen AC 1997. Consumption of retrograded (RS3) but not uncooked (RS2) resistant starch shifts nitrogen excretion from urine to faeces in cannulated piglets. The Journal of Nutrition 127, 18281832.
Heijnen MLA, Deurenberg P, Van Amelsfoort JMM, Beynen AC 1995. Replacement of digestible by resistant starch lowers diet-induced thermogenesis in healthy men. The British Journal of Nutrition 73, 423432.
Hoffmann L, Jentsch W, Schiemann R 1990. Measurings of the energy metabolism of adult pigs after the feeding of rations with potato starch, potatoes, beets, sugar beet pulp and roughages as supplements to a basic ration. 1. Energy metabolism and energy utilization. Archives of Animal Nutrition 40, 191208.
Høstmark AT, Ekeland GS, Beckstrøm AC, Meen HD 2006. Postprandial light physical activity blunts the blood glucose increase. Preventive Medicine 42, 369371.
ISO 1997. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Kjeldahl method. ISO 5983. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 1998a. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of gross calorific value. ISO 9831. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 1998b. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. ISO 6496. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 1999. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of fat content. ISO 6492. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 2002. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of crude ash. ISO 5984. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 2006. Determination of acid detergent insoluble fibrous residue content (ADF) and lignin (ADL). ISO 13906. International Organization for Standardization.
Jakobsen K, Thorbek G 1993. The respiratory quotient in relation to fat deposition in fattening-growing pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 69, 333343.
Jensen BB 1996. Methanogenesis in monogastric animals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42, 99112.
Jensen BB, Jørgensen H 1994. Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs. Applied Environmental Microbiology 60, 18971904.
Jensen MB, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB 1993. The activity and straw directed behaviour of pigs offered foods with different crude protein content. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 211221.
Jørgensen HT, Zhao ZQ, Eggum BO 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365378.
Latymer EA, Low AG, Fadden K, Sambrook IE, Woodley SC, Keal HD 1990. Measurement of transit time of digesta through sections of gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed with diets containing various sources of dietary fibre (nonstarch polysaccharides). Archives of Animal Nutrition 40, 667680.
Martin LJM, Dumon HJW, Champ MMJ 1998. Production of short-chain fatty acids from resistant starch in a pig model. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 77, 7180.
Matsuo T, Suzuki M 1999. Effects of dietary composition and exercise timing on substrate utilization and sympathoadrenal function in healthy young women. Metabolism 48, 15961602.
Noblet J, Le Goff G 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on energy value of feeds for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 3552.
Rijnen MMJA, Verstegen MWA, Heetkamp MJW, Haaksma J, Schrama JW 2001. Effects of dietary fermentable carbohydrates on energy metabolism in group-housed sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 148154.
Rijnen MMJA, van den Borne JJGC, Schrama JW, Gerrits WJJ 2003. Housing conditions and carbohydrate source affect within-day variation of energy metabolism in growing pigs. In Progress in research on energy and protein metabolism (ed. WB Souffrant and CC Metges), pp. 367370. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Schrama JW, Bakker GCM 1999. Changes in energy metabolism in relation to physical activity due to fermentable carbohydrates in group-housed, growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 32743280.
Schrama JW, Verstegen MWA, Verboeket PHJ, Schutte JB, Haaksma J 1996. Energy metabolism in relation to physical activity in growing pigs as affected by type of dietary carbohydrate. Journal of Animal Science 74, 22202225.
Schrama JW, Bosch MW, Verstegen MWA, Vorselaars AHPM, Haaksma J, Heetkamp MJW 1998. The energetic value of nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to physical activity in group-housed, growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 30163023.
Shi XS, Noblet J 1993. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of ten feed ingredients in growing pigs fed ad libitum and sows fed at maintenance level: Comparative contribution of the hindgut. Animal Feed Science and Technology 42, 223236.
Shi XS, Noblet J 1994. Effect of body weight and feed composition on the contribution of hindgut digestion of energy and nutrients in pigs. Livestock Production Science 38, 225235.
Staals STM, Bolhuis JE, van den Brand H, Gerrits WJJ 2007. Contribution of straw bedding to digestible nutrient intake of pigs fed diets based on either native or pregelatinized starch. Livestock Science 109, 104107.
Tuyttens FAM 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 261282.
Van der Meulen J, Bakker GC, Bakker JG, De Visser H, Jongbloed W, Everts H 1997. Effect of resistant starch on net portal-drained viscera flux of glucose, volatile fatty acids, urea, and ammonia in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75, 26972704.
Verstegen MWA, Van der Hel W, Brandsma HA, Henken AM, Bransen AM 1987. The Wageningen respiration unit for animal production research: a description of the equipment and its possibilities. In Energy metabolism in farm animals (ed. MWA Verstegen and AM Henken), pp. 2148. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Wenk C, Colombani PC, Van Milgen J and Lemme A 2001. Glossary: terminology in animal and human energy metabolism. In Proceedings of the 15th symposium on energy metabolism in animals, Snekkersten, Denmark, pp. 409-421.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.