Agriness
2013. Melhores da suinocultura – Dados consolidados por estado (6a edição). Agriness, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Alvarenga, RAF
2010. Avaliação de métodos de AICV: um estudo de caso de quatro cenários de ração para frangos de corte. Master dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Alvarenga, RAF, Silva Júnior, VP da and Soares, SR
2012. Comparison of the ecological footprint and a life cycle impact assessment method for a case study on Brazilian broiler feed production. Journal of Cleaner Production
28, 25–32.
Andretta, I, Pomar, C, Rivest, J, Pomar, J, Lovatto, PA and Radünz Neto, J
2014. The impact of feeding growing–finishing pigs with daily tailored diets using precision feeding techniques on animal performance, nutrient utilization, and body and carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science
92, 3925–3936.
Andretta, I, Pomar, C, Rivest, J, Pomar, J and Radünz, J
2016. Precision feeding can significantly reduce lysine intake and nitrogen excretion without compromising the performance of growing pigs. Animal
10, 1137–1147.
Basset-Mens, C and van der Werf, HMG
2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
105, 127–144.
Brossard, L, Dourmad, J-Y, Rivest, J and van Milgen, J
2009. Modelling the variation in performance of a population of growing pig as affected by lysine supply and feeding strategy. Animal
3, 1114–1123.
Brossard, L, Vautier, B, van Milgen, J, Salaun, Y and Quiniou, N
2014. Comparison of in vivo and in silico growth performance and variability in pigs when applying a feeding strategy designed by simulation to control the variability of slaughter weight. Animal Production Science
54, 1939–1945.
Centro de Estudos Avançados em Economia Aplicada – Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘Luiz de Queiroz’
2014. Indicadores de preços. CEPEA-ESALQ, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cherubini, E, Zanghelini, GM, Alvarenga, RAF, Franco, D and Soares, SR
2015a. Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems. Journal of Cleaner Production
87, 68–77.
Cherubini, E, Zanghelini, GM, Tavares, JMR, Belettini, F and Soares, SR
2015b. The finishing stage in swine production: influences of feed composition on carbon footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability
17, 1313–1328.
Eriksson, IS, Elmquist, H, Stern, S and Nybrant, T
2005. Environmental systems analysis of pig production – the impact of feed choice. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
10, 143–154.
Ferket, PR, van Heugten, E, van Kempen, TATG and Angel, R
2002. Nutritional strategies to reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants. Journal of Animal Science
80 (E. Suppl. 2), E168–E182.
Guinée, JB
2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hauschild, L, Lovatto, PA, Pomar, J and Pomar, C
2012. Development of sustainable precision farming systems for swine: Estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science
90, 2255–2263.
Hauschild, L, Pomar, C and Lovatto, PA
2010. Systematic comparison of the empirical and factorial methods used to estimate the nutrient requirements of growing pigs. Animal
4, 714–723.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE)
2014. Produção Agrícola Municipal de 2012. IBGE, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC, Japan.
Kebreab, E, Liedke, A, Caro, D, Deimling, S, Binder, M and Finkbeiner, M
2016. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: a life cycle assessment. Journal of Animal Science
94, 2664–2681.
McAuliffe, GA, Chapman, DV and Sage, CL
2016. A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production. Environmental Impact Assessment Review
56, 12–22.
Meul, M, Ginneberge, C, Van Middelaar, CE, de Boer, IJM, Fremaut, D and Haesaert, G
2012. Carbon footprint of five pig diets using three land use change accounting methods. Livestock Science
149, 215–223.
Monteiro, AN, Garcia-Launay, F, Brossard, L, Wilfart, A and Dourmad, JY
2016. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment. Journal of Animal Science
94, 4832–4847.
Mosnier, E, van der Werf, HMG, Boissy, J and Dourmad, J-Y
2011. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. Animal
5, 1972–1983.
Niemi, JK, Sevón-Aimonen, M-L, Pietola, K and Stalder, KJ
2010. The value of precision feeding technologies for grow–finish swine. Livestock Science
129, 13–23.
Pomar, C, Hauschild, L, Zhang, G-H, Pomar, J and Lovatto, PA
2009. Applying precision feeding techniques in growing-finishing pig operations. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
38, 226–237.
Pomar, C, Kyriazakis, I, Emmans, GC and Knap, PW
2003. Modeling stochasticity: dealing with populations rather than individual pigs. Journal of Animal Science
81 (E. suppl. 2), E178–E186.
Pomar, C, Pomar, J, Rivest, J, Cloutier, L, Letourneau-Montminy, M-P, Andretta, I and Hauschild, L
2014. Estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs: towards a new definition of nutrient requirements in growing-finishing pigs?. In Nutritional modelling in pigs and poultry (ed. NK Sakomura, RM Gous, I Kyriazakis and L Hauschild), pp. 157–174. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
Prudêncio da Silva, V, van der Werf, HMG, Spies, A and Soares, SR
2010. Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management
91, 1831–1839.
Rostagno, HS, Albino, LFT, Donzele, JL, Gomes, PC, Oliveira, RF, de, Lopes, DC, Ferreira, AS, Barreto, SL, de, T and Euclides, RF
2011. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos. UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Spies, A
2009. Avaliação de impactos ambientais da suinocultura através da análise de ciclo de vida – ACV. In Suinocultura e meio ambiente em Santa Catarina: indicadores de desempenho e avaliação sócio-econômica (ed. CR de Miranda and M Miele), pp. 13–43. Embrapa Suínos e Aves, Concórdia, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Talamini, DJD, Martins, FM, Arboit, C and Wolozsim, N
2006. Custos agregados da produção integrada de suínos nas fases de leitões e de terminação. Custos e Agronegócio
2, 64–83.
van der Werf, HMG, Petit, J and Sanders, J
2005. The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne. Agricultural Systems
83, 153–177.
van Zeist, WJ, Marinussen, M, Broekema, R, Groen, E, Kool, A, Dolman, M and Blonk, H
2012a. LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization: crushing industry. Blonk Consultants, Gouda, the Netherlands.
van Zeist, WJ, Marinussen, M, Broekema, R, Groen, E, Kool, A, Dolman, M and Blonk, H
2012b. LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization: dry milling industry. Blonk Consultants, Gouda, the Netherlands.
Wathes, CM, Kristensen, HH, Aerts, JM and Berckmans, D
2008. Is precision livestock farming an engineer’s daydream or nightmare, an animal’s friend or foe, and a farmer’s panacea or pitfall?
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
64, 2–10.
