Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions

  • Y. Sasu-Boakye (a1), C. Cederberg (a1) and S. Wirsenius (a1)
Abstract

Livestock farmers in Sweden usually grow feed grains for livestock but import protein feed from outside Sweden. Aside from the economic implications, some environmental issues are associated with this practice. We used life cycle assessment to evaluate the impact of local protein feed production on land use and greenhouse gas emissions, compared with the use of imported protein feed, for pig meat and dairy milk produced in Sweden. Our results showed that local production reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 4.5% and 12%, respectively, for pigs and dairy cows. Land use for feed production in Sweden increased by 11% for pigs and 25% for dairy cows, but total land use decreased for pig production and increased for dairy milk production. Increased protein feed cultivation in Sweden decreased inputs needed for animal production and improved some ecological processes (e.g. nutrient recycling) of the farm systems. However, the differences in results between scenarios are relatively small and influenced to an extent by methodological choices such as co-product allocation. Moreover, it was difficult to assess the contribution of greenhouse emissions from land use change. The available accounting methods we applied did not adequately account for the potential land use changes and in some cases provided conflicting results. We conclude that local protein feed production presents an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but at a cost of increasing land occupation in Sweden for feed production.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: yaws@chalmers.se
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E Barona , N Ramankutty , G Hyman and OT Coomes 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5, 024002.

K Beauchemin , M Kreuzer , F O’Mara and T McAllister 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Animal Production Science 48, 2127.

T Canh , A Aarnink , J Schutte , A Sutton , D Langhout and M Verstegen 1998. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing–finishing pigs. Livestock Production Science 56, 181191.

S Di Falco and C Perrings 2005. Crop biodiversity, risk management and the implications of agricultural assistance. Ecological Economics 55, 459466.

N Fageria and V Baligar 2005. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy 88, 97185.

A Flysjo , C Cederberg , M Henriksson and S Ledgard 2012. The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change – critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. Journal of Cleaner Production 28, 134142.

TW Hertel , AA Golub , AD Jones , M O’Hare , RJ Plevin and DM Kammen 2010. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses. BioScience 60, 223231.

SJ Hortenhuber , T Lindenthal and W Zollitsch 2011. Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from feed supply chains by utilizing regionally produced protein sources: the case of Austrian dairy production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 11181127.

J Kirkegaard , O Christen , J Krupinsky and D Layzell 2008. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185195.

S Lehuger , B Gabrielle and N Gagnaire 2009. Environmental impact of the substitution of imported soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 616624.

JP Lesschen , GL Velthof , W de Vries and J Kros 2011. Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution 159, 32153222.

TA McAllister , EK Okine , GW Mathison and KJ Cheng 1996. Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76, 231243.

M Meul , C Ginneberge , CE Van Middelaar , IJM de Boer , D Fremaut and G Haesaert 2012. Carbon footprint of five pig diets using three land use change accounting methods. Livestock Science 149, 215223.

T Nemecek , JS von Richthofen , G Dubois , P Casta , R Charles and H Pahl 2008. Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 380393.

IS Eriksson , H Elmquist , S Stern and T Nybrant 2005. Environmental systems analysis of pig production-the impact of feed choice. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10, 143154.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 225 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 272 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.