Skip to main content
×
Home

Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions

  • Y. Sasu-Boakye (a1), C. Cederberg (a1) and S. Wirsenius (a1)
Abstract

Livestock farmers in Sweden usually grow feed grains for livestock but import protein feed from outside Sweden. Aside from the economic implications, some environmental issues are associated with this practice. We used life cycle assessment to evaluate the impact of local protein feed production on land use and greenhouse gas emissions, compared with the use of imported protein feed, for pig meat and dairy milk produced in Sweden. Our results showed that local production reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 4.5% and 12%, respectively, for pigs and dairy cows. Land use for feed production in Sweden increased by 11% for pigs and 25% for dairy cows, but total land use decreased for pig production and increased for dairy milk production. Increased protein feed cultivation in Sweden decreased inputs needed for animal production and improved some ecological processes (e.g. nutrient recycling) of the farm systems. However, the differences in results between scenarios are relatively small and influenced to an extent by methodological choices such as co-product allocation. Moreover, it was difficult to assess the contribution of greenhouse emissions from land use change. The available accounting methods we applied did not adequately account for the potential land use changes and in some cases provided conflicting results. We conclude that local protein feed production presents an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but at a cost of increasing land occupation in Sweden for feed production.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: yaws@chalmers.se
References
Hide All
Audsley E, Brander M, Chatterton J, Murphy-Bokern D, Webster C and Williams A 2009. How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope for reduction by 2050. WWF, UK.
Barona E, Ramankutty N, Hyman G and Coomes OT 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5, 024002.
Beauchemin K, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F and McAllister T 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Animal Production Science 48, 2127.
BSI 2012. PAS 2050-1:2012. Assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from horticultural products. Supplementary requirements for the cradle to gate stages of GHG assessments of horticultural products undertaken in accordance with PAS 2050. British Standards Institution, London, UK.
Canh T, Aarnink A, Schutte J, Sutton A, Langhout D and Verstegen M 1998. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing–finishing pigs. Livestock Production Science 56, 181191.
Cederberg C and Flysjö A 2004. Environmental assessment of future pig farming systems – quantifications of three scenarios from the food 21 synthesis work. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Cederberg C, Henriksson M and Berglund M 2013. An LCA researcher’s wish list – data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production. Animal 7, 212219.
Di Falco S and Perrings C 2005. Crop biodiversity, risk management and the implications of agricultural assistance. Ecological Economics 55, 459466.
Dumont B, Fortun-Lamothe L, Jouven M, Thomas M and Tichit M 2013. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 7, 10281043.
Dustan A 2002. Review of methane and nitrous oxide emission factors for manure management in cold climates. Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ecoinvent 2007. The ecoinvent database version 2.0. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Emanuelson M, Cederberg C, Bertilsson J and Rietz H 2006. Närodlat foder till mjölkkor–en kunskapsuppdatering. Svensk Mjölk, Uppsala, Sweden.
Engström L 2010. Nitrogen dynamics in crop sequences with winter oilseed rape and winter wheat. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
Eriksson IS, Elmquist H, Stern S and Nybrant T 2005. Environmental systems analysis of pig production-the impact of feed choice. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10, 143154.
Fageria N and Baligar V 2005. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy 88, 97185.
FAOSTAT 2014. FAO Statistics Division. Retrieved 10 February 2014, from http://faostat3.fao.org/
Flysjö A, Cederberg C and Strid I 2008. LCA-databas för konventionella fodermedel–miljöpåverkan i samband med produktion. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Flysjo A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M and Ledgard S 2012. The interaction between milk and beef production and emissions from land use change – critical considerations in life cycle assessment and carbon footprint studies of milk. Journal of Cleaner Production 28, 134142.
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A and Tempio G 2013a. Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
Gerber PJ, Hristov AN, Henderson B, Makkar H, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Firkins J, Rotz A, Dell C, Adesogan AT, Yang WZ, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Dijkstra J and Oosting S 2013b. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review. Animal 7, 220234.
Henriksson M, Cederberg C and Swensson C 2014. Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations. Animal, published online 25 March 2014,doi:10.1017/S1751731114000627.
Hertel TW, Golub AA, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Plevin RJ and Kammen DM 2010. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses. BioScience 60, 223231.
Hortenhuber SJ, Lindenthal T and Zollitsch W 2011. Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from feed supply chains by utilizing regionally produced protein sources: the case of Austrian dairy production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 11181127.
IBGE 2014. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Retrieved 20 January 2014, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/
IPCC 2006. Agriculture, forestry and other land use. In Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (ed. HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara and K Tanabe), 558pp. IGES, Kanagawa, Japan.
IPCC 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 2006. Environmental management – life cycle assessment–principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karlsson S and Rodhe L 2002. Översyn av statistiska centralbyråns beräkning av ammoniakavgången i jordbruket–emissionsfaktorer för ammoniak vid lagring och spridning av stallgödsel. Institutet för jordbruks och miljöteknik, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kirkegaard J, Christen O, Krupinsky J and Layzell D 2008. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185195.
Lehuger S, Gabrielle B and Gagnaire N 2009. Environmental impact of the substitution of imported soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 616624.
Lesschen JP, Velthof GL, de Vries W and Kros J 2011. Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution 159, 32153222.
Liljeholm M, Bertilsson J and Strid I 2009. Närproducerat foder till svenska mjölkkor. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
McAllister TA, Okine EK, Mathison GW and Cheng KJ 1996. Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76, 231243.
Meul M, Ginneberge C, Van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM, Fremaut D and Haesaert G 2012. Carbon footprint of five pig diets using three land use change accounting methods. Livestock Science 149, 215223.
Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Nguyen TTH and Knudsen MT 2012. Greenhouse gas emissions from production of imported and local cattle feed. In 8th International conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector (ed. MS Corson and HMG van der Werf), pp. 321326. INRA, Rennes, France.
Mosnier E, van der Werf HMG, Boissy J and Dourmad JY 2011. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using life cycle assessment. Animal 5, 19721983.
Nemecek T, von Richthofen JS, Dubois G, Casta P, Charles R and Pahl H 2008. Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 380393.
SBA 2012. Riktlinjer för gödsling och kalkning 2013. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, Sweden.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 308 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 356 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.