Skip to main content
×
Home

Number of females in cattle, sheep, pig, goat and horse breeds predicted from a single year's registration data

  • S. J. G. Hall (a1)
Abstract

An objective and accountable method is needed for deducing the number of registered animals in a breed from registration data. By following the principle that individual breeders register sufficient young females to be certain of having enough replacements for their current breeding stock, the ratios were calculated of the number of adult females in a breed to the number of female registrations, in a given year. Number of breeds considered were 8 cattle, 16 sheep, 8 pigs, 1 goat and 2 equines, all in the United Kingdom or Ireland. This yielded multipliers (4.4 for cattle, 3.3 for sheep, 3.1 for pigs, with confidence limits; and a point estimate of 5.2 for goats) enabling total adult female population to be predicted from a single year's registration data. There was considerable variation between breeds in values of the multiplier, apparently for reasons of breed history and function. This was particularly evident for equines where the two breeds yielded multipliers of 3.8 and 13.9. Multipliers, using registration data that are already in the public domain, can provide an estimate of breed numerical size, which a breed society can either accept or replace with an audited census.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Number of females in cattle, sheep, pig, goat and horse breeds predicted from a single year's registration data
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Number of females in cattle, sheep, pig, goat and horse breeds predicted from a single year's registration data
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Number of females in cattle, sheep, pig, goat and horse breeds predicted from a single year's registration data
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: sthall@lincoln.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Anonymous 2003. Annual BPA survey of rare pig breeds. Ark 31 (Spring 2003), 2731.
Anonymous 2005a. Pig bloodline survey – part 1. Ark 33 (Summer 2005), 3033.
Anonymous 2005b. Pig bloodline survey. Ark 33 (Autumn 2005), 4245.
Bates M 2002. Annual BPA survey of rare pig breeds. Ark 30 (Spring 2002), 2226.
Caballero A, Toro MA 2000. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetical Research 75, 331343.
Caswell H 2001. Matrix population models. Construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) 2002. UK country report on farm animal genetic resources 2002. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
Donald HP, El Itriby AA 1945. Herd size and its genetical significance in pedigree cattle breeding. Journal of Agricultural Science 35, 8494.
European Federation of Thoroughbred Breeders’ Associations (EFTBA) 2007. Annual report 2008 and statistical overview. Retrieved June 7, 2010, from http://www.eftba.eu/files/EFTBA.pdf.
Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H, Toro MA, Scherf B, Pilling D, Negrini R, Finlay EK, Jianlin H, Groeneveld E, Weigend S, GLOBALDIV Consortium 2010. Genetic diversity in farm animals – a review. Animal Genetics 41 (suppl. 1), 631.
Hall SJG 1986. Genetic conservation of rare British sheep: the Portland, Manx Loghtan and Hebridean breeds. Journal of Agricultural Science 107, 133144.
Hall SJG 1989a. Breed structures of rare pigs: implications for conservation of the Berkshire, Tamworth, Middle White, Large Black, Gloucester Old Spot, British Saddleback, and British Lop. Conservation Biology 3, 3038.
Hall SJG 1989b. Conserving and developing minority British breeds of sheep: the example of the Southdown. Journal of Agricultural Science 112, 3945.
Hall SJG, Clutton-Brock J 1988. Two hundred years of British farm livestock. British Museum (Natural History), London.
Kiddy G 2003. The British Lop pig. Ark 31 (Summer 2003), 3435.
Nix J, Hill P 1998. Farm management pocketbook, 29th edition. Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent.
Olori VE, Wickham B 2004. Strategies for the conservation of the indigenous Kerry cattle of Ireland. Animal Genetic Resources Information 35, 3747.
Özkütük K, Bichard M 1977. Studies of pedigree Hereford cattle breeding 1. Herdbook analyses. Animal Production 24, 113.
Ross P 1989. Goats – a guide to management. Crowood Press, Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK.
Searle P 2009. 2009 census report. Golden Guernsey Goat Society. Retrieved June 7, 2010, from http://www.goldenguernseygoats.org.uk.
Soffe RJ (ed.) 2003. Primrose McConnell's the agricultural notebook, 20th edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Townsend SJ 2004. UK rare breeds: population genetic analyses and implications for applied conservation. In Farm animal genetic resources (ed. G Simm, B Villanueva, KD Sinclair and S Townsend), pp. 299304. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.
Trewhella R 2008. The rise and rise of British Jerseys. In The World Jersey Journal, 18th International Conference of the World Jersey Cattle Bureau (ed. D Frigot), pp. 4446. Royal Jersey Agricultural and Horticultural Society, Jersey.
Vu Tien Khang J 1983. Methods of analysis of demographic and genealogical data in the populations of domestic animals. Génétique Sélection Evolution 15, 263298.
Young GB, Purser AF 1962. Breed structure and genetic analysis of Border Leicester sheep. Animal Production 4, 379389.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 48 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.