Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Significance of chick quality score in broiler production

  • L. J. F. van de Ven (a1) (a2), A. V. van Wagenberg (a1), K. A. Uitdehaag (a1), P. W. G. Groot Koerkamp (a3), B. Kemp (a2) and H. van den Brand (a2)...
Abstract

The quality of day old chicks is crucial for profitable broiler production, but a difficult trait to define. In research, both qualitative and quantitative measures are used with variable predictive value for subsequent performance. In hatchery practice, chick quality is judged on a binomial scale, as chicks are divided into first grade (Q1-saleable) and second grade (Q2) chicks right after hatch. Incidences and reasons for classifying chicks as Q2, and potential of these chicks for survival and post-hatch performance have hardly been investigated, but may provide information for flock performance. We conducted an experiment to investigate (1) the quality of a broiler flock and the relation with post-hatch flock performance based on a qualitative score (Pasgar©score) of Q1 chicks and based on the incidence of Q2 chicks and (2) the reasons for classifying chicks as Q2, and the potential of these chicks for survival and post-hatch growth. The performance was followed of Q1 and Q2 chicks obtained from two breeder flocks that hatched in two different hatching systems (a traditional hatcher or a combined hatching and brooding system, named Patio). Eggs were incubated until embryo day 18, when they were transferred to one of the two hatching systems. At embryo day 21/post-hatch day 0, all chicks from the hatcher (including Q2 chicks) were brought to Patio, where the hatchery manager marked the Q2 chicks from both flocks and hatching systems and registered apparent reasons for classifying these chicks as Q2. Chick quality was assessed of 100 Q1 chicks from each flock and hatching system. Weights of all chicks were determined at days 0, 7, 21 and 42. There were no correlations between mean Pasgar©score and post-hatch growth or mortality, and suboptimal navel quality was the only quality trait associated with lower post-hatch growth. Growth was clearly affected by breeder flock and hatching system, which could not be linked to mean Pasgar©score or incidence of Q2 chicks. Q2 chicks showed lower post-hatch growth compared to Q1 chicks but effects on flock performance at slaughter weight were limited because early mortality in Q2 chicks was high (62.50% at 7 days). We concluded that chick qualitative scores and the incidence of Q2 chicks may be informative for the quality of incubation, but are not predictive for post-hatch flock performance. Culling Q2 chicks after hatch is well-founded in terms of both animal welfare and profitability.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Significance of chick quality score in broiler production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Significance of chick quality score in broiler production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Significance of chick quality score in broiler production
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: Lotte.vandeVen@Vencomatic.com
References
Hide All
BoerjanM 2002. Programs for single stage incubation and chick quality. Avian Poultry Biology Reviews 13, 237238.
CareghiC, TonaK, OnagbesanO, BuyseJ, DecuypereE, BruggemanV 2005. The effects of the spread of hatch and interaction with delayed feed access after hatch on broiler performance until 7 days of age. Poultry Science 84, 13141320.
DecuypereE, BruggemanV 2007. The endocrine interface of environmental and egg factors affecting chick quality. Poultry Science 86, 10371042.
European Union 2007. Council Directive 2007/43/EC. Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. Official Journal of the European Union L 182, 1928.
FasenkoGM, O'DeaEE 2008. Evaluating broiler growth and mortality in chicks with minor navel conditions at hatching. Poultry Science 87, 594597.
GonzalesE, KondoN, SaldanhaESPB, LoddyMM, CareghiC, DecuypereE 2003. Performance and physiological parameters of broiler chickens subjected to fasting on the neonatal period. Poultry Science 82, 12501256.
KwalilakLT, Ulmer FrancoAM, FasenkoGJ 2010. Impaired intestinal villi growth in broiler chicks with unhealed navels. Poultry Science 89, 8287.
LeksrisompongN, Romero-SanchezH, PlumsteadPW, BrannanKE, BrakeJ 2007. Broiler incubation. 1. Effect of elevated temperature during late incubation on body weight and organs of chicks. Poultry Science 86, 26852691.
LourensA, van den BrandH, MeijerhofR, KempB 2005. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability and post-hatch development. Poultry Science 84, 914920.
NoyY, SklanD 1999. Energy utilization in newly hatched chicks. Poultry Science 75, 17501756.
ReijrinkIAM, MeijerhofR, KempB, GraatEAM, van den BrandH 2009. Influence of prestorage incubation on embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality. Poultry Science 88, 26492660.
ReijrinkIAM, BerghmansD, MeijerhofR, KempB, van den BrandH 2010. Influence of egg storage time and preincubation warming profile on embryonic development, hatchability and chick quality. Poultry Science 89, 12251238.
RomanoffAL 1960. The avian embryo. Structural and functional development. The Macmillan Company, New York.
SAS Institute 2004. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
SzdzuyK, FongLM, MortolaJP 2008. Oxygenation and establishment of thermogenesis in the avian embryo. Life Sciences 82, 5058.
TonaK, OnagbesanO, De KetelaereB, DecuypereE, BruggemanV 2004. Effects of age of broiler breeders and egg storage on egg quality, hatchability, chick quality, chick weight, and chick post-hatch growth to forty-two days. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13, 1018.
TonaK, OnagbesanO, De KetelaereB, BruggemanV, DecuypereE 2005. Interrelationships between chick quality traits and the effect of individual parameter on broiler relative growth to 7 days of age. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 69, 6772.
TonaK, BamelisF, De KetelaereB, BruggemanV, MoraesVMB, BuyseJ, OnagbesanO, DecuypereE 2003. Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 82, 736741.
Ulmer-FrancoAM, FasenkoGM, O'Dea ChristopherEE 2010. Hatching egg characteristics, chick quality, and broiler performance at 2 breeder flock ages and from 3 egg weights. Poultry Science 89, 27352742.
van de VenLJF, van WagenbergAV, Groot KoerkampPWG, KempB, van den BrandH 2009. Effects of a combined hatching and brooding system on hatchability, chick weight, and mortality in broilers. Poultry Science 88, 22732279.
van de VenLJF, van WagenbergAV, DebonneM, DecuypereE, KempB, van den BrandH 2011. Hatching system and time effects on broiler physiology and posthatch growth. Poultry Science 90, 12671275.
WillemsenH, EveraertN, WittersA, De SmitL, DebonneM, VerschuereF, GarainP, BerckmansD, DecuypereE, BruggemanV 2008. Critical assessment of chick quality measurements as an indicator of post-hatch performance. Poultry Science 87, 23582366.
WilsonHR 2004. Hatchability problem analysis. 1. University of Florida IFAS Extension CIR1112. University of Florida, Gainesville.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 200 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 226 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.