Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops

  • K. Horsted (a1) and J. E. Hermansen (a1)
Abstract

In many cases health and welfare problems are observed in organic egg production systems, as are high environmental risks related to nutrient leaching. These disadvantages might be reduced if the layers are allowed to utilise their ability to forage to a higher degree thereby reducing the import of nutrients into the system and stimulating the hens to perform a natural behaviour. However, very little is known about the ability of modern high-producing layers to take advantage of foraging to cover their nutritional needs, and the aim of the present work was to clarify this subject. Six flocks, each of 26 hens and one cock, were moved regularly in a rotation between different forage crops for a period of 130 days. Half of the flocks were fed typical layer feed for organic layers and half were fed whole wheat. The forage crops consisted of grass/clover, pea/vetch/oats, lupin and quinoa. At the beginning of the experiment, wheat-fed hens had a lower intake of supplementary feed (wheat) and a lower laying rate, egg weight and body weight. However, after a period of 6 to 7 weeks, the intake of wheat increased to approximately 100 g per hen per day and the laying rate increased to the same level as for the hens fed layer feed. For both groups of hens egg weight and body weight increased during the remaining part of the experiment. Crop analysis revealed different food preferences for hens fed layer feed and wheat-fed hens. Wheat-fed hens ate less of the cultivated seeds, whereas the amounts of plant material, oyster shells, insoluble grit stone and soil were larger in the crops from wheat-fed hens. Floor eggs were significantly more frequent in the hens fed layer feed, whereas wheat-fed hens only rarely laid floor eggs. Irrespective of treatment, hens were found to have excellent health and welfare. We conclude that nutrient-restricted, high-producing organic layers are capable of finding and utilising considerable amounts of different feed items from a cultivated foraging area without negative effects on their health and welfare.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* E-mail: Klaus.Horsted@agrsci.dk
References
Hide All
Ambrosen, T and Petersen, VE 1997. The influence of protein level in the diet on cannibalism and quality of plumage of layers. Poultry Science 76, 559-563.
Antell, S and Ciszuk, P 2006. Forage consumption of laying hens – the crop as an indicator of feed intake and AME content of ingested feed. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 70 (in press).
Appleby, MC 1984. Factors affecting floor laying by domestic fowl: a review. World Poultry Science Journal 40, 241-249.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Bach-Knudsen, KE 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319-338.
Bach-Knudsen, KE and Li, B 1991. Determination of oligosaccharides in proteinrich feedstuffs by gas-liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 39, 689-694.
Bestman, MWP and Wagenaar, JP 2003. Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livestock Production Science 80, 133-140.
Bubier, NE and Bradshaw, RH 1998. Movement of flocks of laying hens in and out of the hen house in four free range systems. British Poultry Science 39, S5-S6.
Buckner, GD, Insko, WM Jr and Henry, AH 1945. Influences of spring bluegrass and mature bluegrass pastures on laying hens and on the eggs produced. Poultry Science 24, 446-450.
Chwalibog, A 1993. Husdyrernæring – Bestemmelse af næringsværdi og næringsbehov, 2. udgave. Jordbrugsforlaget, København.
Cooper, JJ and Appleby, MC 1996. Individual variation in prelaying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs. British Poultry Science 37, 245-253.
Elwinger, K, Tufvesson, M and Hartmann, C 2002. Genotype-environment interactions in layers housed in an organic feed environment. Eleventh European poultry conference, 6–10 September, Bremen, Archiv für Geflügelkunde 66, 32-33.
Ferket, P 2000. Feeding whole grains to poultry improves gut health. Feedstuffs (USA) 4 September, 12-14.
Fuller, HL 1962. Restricted feeding of pullets. 1. The value of pasture and self-selection of dietary components. Poultry Science 41, 1729-1736.
Gunnarson, S, Odén, K, Algers, B, Svedberg, J and Keeling, L 1995. Poultry health and behaviour in a tiered system for loose housed layers. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för husdjurshygien: Rapport 35, Skara, Sweden.
Gustafson, G and Antell, S 2005. Ekosystemtjänster i äggproduktionen, hur kan det se ut? Ekologiskt lantbruk konferens 22–23 November, pp. 290-291. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Centrum för Uthålligt Lantbruk, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hegelund, L, Sørensen, JT, Kjær, JB and Kristensen, IS 2005. Use of range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover. British Poultry Science 46, 1-8.
Hegelund, L, Sørensen, JT and Hermansen, JE 2006. Welfare and productivity of laying hens in commercial organic egg production systems in Denmark. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54, 147-155.
Heuser, GF 1955. Feeding poultry, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
Heuser, GF 1945. The rate of passage of feed from the crop of the hen. Poultry Science 24, 20-24.
Horsted, K, Hammershøj, M and Hermansen, JE 2006. Short-term effects on productivity and egg quality in nutrient-restricted versus non-restricted organic layers with access to different forage crops. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A 56, 42-54.
Hy-Line® 2006. Hy-Line® Variety Brown. Commercial management guide, alternative systems.www.swedegg.se/pdf/varietybrown.pdf Accessed 9 May 2006.
Keeling, LJ, Hughes, BO and Dun, P 1988. Performance of free-range laying hens in a polythene house and their behaviour on range. Farm Building Progress 94, 21-28.
Lepkovsky, S, Chari-Bitron, A, Lemmon, RM, Ostwald, RC and Dimick, MK 1960. Metabolic and anatomic adaptations in chickens “trained” to eat their daily food in two hours. Poultry Science 39, 385-389.
Lohmann Tierzucht 2006. Management guide for laying hens in deep litter, aviary and free-range systems.www.ltz.de/bilder/content/ltz,_haltung_englisch.pdf Accessed 18 May 2006.
Mongin, P 1976. Composition of crop and gizzard contents in the laying hen. British Poultry Science 17, 499-507.
Mwalusanya, NA, Katule, AM, Mutayoba, SK, Minga, UM, Mtambo, MMA and Olsen, JE 2002. Nutrient status of crop contents of rural scavenging local chickens in Tanzania. British Poultry Science 43, 64-69.
National Research Council 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Permin, A, Bisgaard, M, Frandsen, F, Pearman, M, Kold, J and Nansen, P 1999. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in different poultry production systems. British Poultry Science 40, 439-443.
Permin, A, Nansen, P, Bisgaard, M and Frandsen, F 1998. Ascaridia galli infections in free-range layers fed on diets with different protein contents. British Poultry Science 39, 441-445.
Pokarzhevskii, AD, Zaboyev, DP, Ganin, GN and Gordienko, SA 1997. Amino acids in earthworms: Are earthworms ecosystemivorous? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 559-567.
Reichert, R, Tatarynovich, JT and Tyler, RT 1986. Abrasive dehulling of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): effect on saponin content as determined by an adapted hemolytic assay. Cereal Chemistry 63, 471-475.
Ridout, CL, Price, KR, DuPont, MS, Parker, ML and Fenwick, GR 1989. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) saponins – analysis and preliminary investigations into the effects of reduction by processing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 54, 165-176.
Sipe, GR and Polk, HD 1941. Japanese tendergreen mustard, Italian rye grass, and oats as a source of green feed for laying hens. Poultry Science 20, 406-412.
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1990. SAS/STAT® users guide. SAS Inst. Inc, Cary, NC.
Steenfeldt, S, Engberg, RM and Kjær, JB 2001. Grovfoder til æglæggende høner. In Forskning og udvikling i økologisk ægproduktion (ed. Sørensen, P), pp. 49-59. Darcof report no. 11, Research Centre Foulum, Tjele, Denmark.
Stoldt, W 1952. Vorschlag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettbestimmung in Lebensmitteln (suggestion to standardise the determination of fat in foodstuffs). Fetten, Seifen, Anstrichmittel 54, 206-207.
Tauson, R, Ambrosen, T and Elwinger, K 1984. Evaluation of procedures for scoring the integument of laying hens – independent scoring of plumage condition. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 34, 400-408.
Walker, A and Gordon, S 2003. Intake of nutrients from the pasture. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 253-256.
Wechsler, B and Huber-Eicher, B 1998. The effect of foraging material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58, 131-141.
Williams, BA, Van Osch, LJM and Kwakkel, RP 1997. Fermentation characteristics of the caecal contents of broiler chickens fed fine and coarse particle diets. British Poultry Science 38, S41-S42.
Wood, GM, Smith, RT and Henderson, DC 1963. A crop analysis technique for studying the food habits and preferences of chickens on range. Poultry Science 42, 304-309.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 173 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.