Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vcb8f Total loading time: 0.423 Render date: 2022-09-29T13:51:24.668Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake – impact on macrophyte biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2012

Marit Mjelde*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
Paola Lombardo
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, “Marco Giustini” Ecology Lab, Coppito Science Center, University of L'Aquila, I-67100 L'Aquila, Italy Limno Consulting, via Bedollo 303, I-00124 Rome, Italy
Dag Berge
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
Stein W. Johansen
Affiliation:
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), Drammensveien 211, N-0281 Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: marit.mjelde@niva.no
Get access

Abstract

The impact of Elodea canadensis on aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in (Lake) Steinsfjord has been studied through extensive lake-wide surveys and photographic sampling. E. canadensis greatly expanded in Steinsfjord since its appearance in 1978 and still dominated the macrophyte community in 2004. The areal distribution of E. canadensis peaked within 6 years from invasion and has remained relatively stable since; however, stands no longer reach the water surface. E. canadensis significantly increased its depth range, but the cover-weighted mean depth remained unchanged, suggesting that 3–4 m is its optimal depth in Steinsfjord. Species richness has not changed significantly since the earliest survey in 1936–38. However, species composition has changed remarkably, from isoetid dominance in 1936–38 to a diverse community dominated by Najas flexilis in 1979–80 to a less diverse community dominated by E. canadensis in 2004, with Potamogeton berchtoldii and Myriophyllum alterniflorum as lake-wide subdominants. Regardless of their abundance at the onset of the E. canadensis invasion, taxa whose cover-weighted mean depth overlapped with E. canadensis's in 1979–80 greatly reduced their abundance in 2004, shifted to deeper or shallow water or disappeared from sampling stations. Our survey indicates that E. canadensis may be the reason for the decrease of N. flexilis, likely through depletion of CO2 in the water column and reduced nutrients in sediments. The abilities to survive and grow in periodically exposed shallow areas, combined with minor herbivory by waterfowl, are likely important factors for the increase of M. alterniflorum in Steinsfjord's shallow waters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, M.M. and Soltan, M.A., 2006. Expansion of Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian water milfoil) into Lake Nasser, Egypt: invasive capacity and habitat stability. Aquat. Bot., 84, 239244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baardseth, E., 1942. A study of the vegetation of Steinsfjord, Ringerike. A.W. Brøggers Boktrykkeri A/S. Nytt Magasin for Naturvidenskapene B., 83, 947.Google Scholar
Barrat-Segretain, M.-H., 2001. Invasive species in the Rhône River floodplain (France): replacement of Elodea canadensis Michaux by E. nuttallii St. John in two former river channels. Arch. Hydrobiol., 152, 237251.Google Scholar
Barrat-Segretain, M.-H., Henry, C.P. and Bornette, G., 1999. Regeneration and colonization of aquatic plant fragments in relation to the disturbance of their habitats. Arch. Hydrobiol., 145, 111127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, D., 1986. Overvåking av Tyrifjorden og Steinsfjorden 1982–1985. Sluttrapport. NIVA Report No. 1879 (in Norwegian).
Berge, D. (ed.), 1989. Vasspest – problem og ressurs. Sammenfattende sluttrapport fra vasspestprosjektene. NIVA Report No. O-86238 (in Norwegian).
Bonar, S.A., Fehmi, J.S. and Mercado-Silva, N., 2011. An overview of sampling issues in species diversity and abundance surveys. In: Magurran, A. and McGill, B.J. (eds.), Biological Diversity – Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1124.Google Scholar
Bowmer, K.H., Mitchell, D.S. and Short, D.L., 1984. Biology of Elodea canadensis Michx. and its management in Australian irrigation systems. Aquat. Bot., 18, 231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canham, C.D. and Thomas, R.Q., 2010. Frequency, not relative abundance, of temperate tree species varies along climate gradients in eastern North America. Ecology, 91, 34333440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carignan, R. and Kalff, J., 1980. Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds: water or sediments? Science, 207, 977989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, H.M. and Levine, J.M., 2007. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic annual grasses in a coastal California meadow. Biol. Invasions, 9, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.D., Sheldon, R.B. and Boylen, C.W., 1987. Littoral zone macrophyte community structure: distribution and association of species along physical gradients in Lake George, New York, USA. Aquat. Bot., 29, 177194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J. and D'Antonio, C.M., 2004. Competition between native perennial and exotic annual grasses: implications for a historic species invasion. Ecology, 85, 12731283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craine, J.M., Fargione, J. and Sugita, S., 2005. Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytol., 166, 933940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M.J., 1983. Herbivory: The Dynamics of Animal–Plant Interactions, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Erhard, D. and Gross, E.M., 2006. Allelopathic activity of Elodea canadensis and Elodea nuttallii against epiphytes and phytoplankton. Aquat. Bot., 85, 203211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.A., 1954. Standard Methods for Research Workers, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Forest, H.S., 1977. Study of submerged aquatic vascular plants in northern glacial lakes of New York State, USA. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon., 12, 329341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, T.D. and Chambers, P.A., 1996. Habitat-partitioning in riverine macrophyte communities. Freshw. Biol., 36, 509520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glänzer, U., Haber, W. and Kohler, A., 1977. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Belastbarkeit submerser Fließgewässer-Makrophyten. Arch. Hydrobiol., 79, 193232.Google Scholar
Golterman, H.L., Clymo, R.S. and Ohnstad, M.A.M., 1978. Methods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No 8 (2nd edn,), Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Gotelli, N.J. and Ellison, A.M., 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Grime, J.P., 1988. The CRS model of primary plant strategies: origins, implications, and tests. In: Gottlieb, L.D. and Jain, S.K. (eds.), Plant Evolutionary Biology, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 371393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, E.M., Hilt, S., Lombardo, P. and Mulderij, G., 2007. Searching for allelopathic effects of submerged macrophytes on phytoplankton — state of the art and open questions. Hydrobiologia, 584, 7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, I.M., Coffey, B.T. and Howard-Williams, C., 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: A New Zealand case study. J. Environ. Manage., 20, 263279.Google Scholar
Jones, J.I., Li, W. and Maberly, S.C., 2003. Area, altitude and aquatic plant diversity. Ecography, 26, 411420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, M., 2011. NOBANIS – Invasive Species Fact Sheet – Elodea canadensis, Elodea nuttallii and Elodea callitrichoides – NOBANIS, http://www.nobanis.org, last accessed 3 Mar. 2011.
Kålås, J.A., Viken, Å., Henriksen, S. and Skjelseth, S. (eds), 2010. The 2010 Norwegian red list for species, Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Norway.Google Scholar
Kłosowski, S., Jabłońska, E. and Szańkowski, M., 2011. Aquatic vegetation as an indicator of littoral habitats and various stages of lake aging in north-eastern Poland. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 47, 281295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapton, R.W. and Petrie, S.A., 1999. Changes in distribution and abundance of submerged macrophytes in the Inner Bay at Long Point, Lake Erie: implications for foraging waterfowl. J. Great Lakes Res., 25, 783798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, B.H., 2006. Elodea-prosjektet Steinsfjorden. Sammenstilling av data om vannfugl: Bestandsutvikling og konsum av vasspest. In: Miljøfaglig Utredning Rapport 12, 117 (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
Lauridsen, T.L., Jeppesen, E. and Andersen, F.Ø., 1993. Colonization of submerged macrophytes in shallow fish-manipulated Lake Væng: Impact of sediment composition and waterfowl grazing. Aquatic Botany, 46(1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstrøm, E-A., Brettum, P., Johansen, S.W. and Mjelde, M., 2004. Vannvegetasjon i norske vassdrag. Tålegrenser for forsuring. Effekter av kalking. NIVA Report No. 4821–2004 (in Norwegian).
Lonsdale, W.M., 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 80, 15221536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J.D., Sutherland, J.W., Bloomfield, J.A., Eichler, L.W. and Boylen, C.W., 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Manage., 29, 9499.Google Scholar
Maurer, B.A. and McGill, B.J., 2011. Measurement of species diversity. In: Magurran, A. and McGill, B.J. (eds.), Biological Diversity – Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 5565.Google Scholar
Mjelde, M., 1997. Virkninger av forurensning på biologisk mangfold: Vann og vassdrag i by- og tettstedsnære områder. Vannvegetasjon i innsjøer – effekter av eutrofiering. En kunnskapsstatus. NIVA Report No. 3755–97 (in Norwegian).
Mjelde, M. and Johansen, S.W., 1997. Vasspest i Steinsfjorden. Status for utbredelse og omfang. NIVA Report No. 3650–97 (in Norwegian).
Moeller, R.E., Burkholder, J.M. and Wetzel, R.G., 1988. Significance of sedimentary phosphorus to a rooted submersed macrophyte (Najas flexilis (Willd.) Rostk. and Schmidt) and its algal epiphytes. Aquat. Bot., 32, 261281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasaka, M., 2004. Changes in biomass and spatial distribution of Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St. John, an invasive submerged plant, in oligomesotrophic Lake Kizaki from 1999 to 2002. Limnology, 5, 129139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S.A., 1994. Evaluation of invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes for the upper Great Lake Region. Lake Reserv. Manage., 10, 2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S.A. and Lathrop, R.C., 1994. Cultural impacts on macrophytes in the Yahara lakes since the late 1800s. Aquat. Bot., 47, 225247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S.A. and Shaw, B.H., 1986. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia, 131, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondok, J.P., Pokorný, J. and Květ, J., 1984. Model of diurnal changes in oxygen, carbon dioxide and bicarbonate concentrations in a stand of Elodea canadensis Michx. Aquat. Bot., 19, 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozimek, T., van Donk, E. and Gulati, R.D., 1993. Growth and nutrient uptake of two species of Elodea in experimental conditions and their role in nutrient accumulation in a macrophyte-dominated lake. Hydrobiologia, 251, 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, M.R., Schutten, J.H., Howes, J.R., Holzer, T., Madgwick, F.J. and Jowitt, A.J.D., 1997. Interactions between coot (Fulica atra) and submerged macrophytes: the role of birds in the restoration process. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 241255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorný, J., Květ, J., Ondok, J.P., Toul, Z. and Ostrý, I., 1984. Production – ecological analysis of a plant community dominated by Elodea canadensis Michx. Aquat. Bot., 19, 263292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C.D. and Croft, J.M., 1997. Aquatic Plants in Britain and Ireland, Harley Books, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Quinn, G.P. and Keough, M.J., 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, M.R., Howard-Williams, C. and Brown, J.M.A., 1991. Sediment and water as source of nitrogen and phosphorus for submerged rooted aquatic macrophytes. Aquat. Bot., 40, 225237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robach, F., Hajnsek, I., Eglin, I. and Trémolières, M., 1995. Phosphorus sources for aquatic macrophytes in running waters: water or sediment? Acta Bot. Gallica, 142, 719731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Villafañe, C., Bécares, E. and Fernández-Aláez, M., 2007. Waterfowl grazing effects on submerged macrophytes in a shallow mediterranean lake. Aquat. Bot., 86, 2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rørslett, B., 1983. Tyrifjord og Steinsfjord. Undersøkelse av vannvegetasjon 1977–1982. 1. Tekstdel. NIVA-report No. 1510 (in Norwegian).
Rørslett, B. 1991. Principal determinants of aquatic macrophyte richness in northern European lakes. Aquat. Bot., 39, 173193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rørslett, B. and Brettum, P., 1989. The genus Isoëtes in Scandinavia: an ecological review and perspectives. Aquat. Bot., 35, 223261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rørslett, B., Berge, D. and Johansen, S.W., 1985. Mass invasion of Elodea canadensis in a mesotrophic, South Norwegian lake – impact on water quality. Verhand. Int. Verein. Limnol., 22, 29202926.Google Scholar
Rørslett, B., Berge, D. and Johansen, S.W., 1986. Lake enrichment by submersed macrophytes: a Norwegian whole-lake experience with Elodea canadensis. Aquat. Bot., 26, 325340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rørslett, B., Green, N.W. and Kvalvågnes, K., 1978. Stereophotography as a tool in aquatic biology. Aquat. Bot., 4, 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Gibbons, L., 2004. Now you see them, now you don't! – Population crashes of established introduced species. Biol. Invasions, 6, 161172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D.A., 1984. A short history of the introduction and spread of Elodea Michx. in the British Isles. Watsonia, 15, 19.Google Scholar
Skogheim, O. and Rognerud, S., 1976. Recent changes in plankton communities and recent trophic status of Lake Steinsfjord. Arch. Hydrobiol., 83, 179199.Google Scholar
Stuckey, R.L., 1979. Distributional history of Potamogeton crispus (curly pondweed) in North America. Bartonia, 46, 2242.Google Scholar
Thiébaut, G., 2005. Does competition for phosphate supply explain the invasion pattern of Elodea species? Water Res., 39, 33853393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiébaut, G., Rolland, T., Robach, F., Trémolières, M. and Muller, S., 1997. Quelques conséquences de l'introduction de deux espèces de macrophytes, Elodea canadensis Michaux et Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) St. John dans les écosystèmes aquatiques continentaux: exemples de la plaine d'Alsace et des Vosges du Nord (Nord-Est de la France). Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 344/345, 441452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisner, S.E.B., Strand, J.A. and Sandsten, H., 1997. Mechanisms regulating abundance of submerged vegetation in shallow eutrophic lakes. Oecologia, 109, 592599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetzel, R.G., 1969. Factors influencing photosynthesis and excretion of dissolved organic matter by aquatic macrophytes in hard-water lakes. Int. Verein. Limnol. Verhand., 17, 7285.Google Scholar
Wingfield, R.A., Murphy, K.J., Hollingsworth, P. and Gaywood, M.J., 2004. The ecology of Najas flexilis. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 017 (ROAME No. F98PA02).
Zar, J.H., 2009. Biostatistical Analysis (5th edn,), Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

OLM - lim vol 48 2 page 225 -2012-- Mass invasion...

Appendix

Download OLM - lim vol 48 2 page 225 -2012-- Mass invasion...(PDF)
PDF 53 KB

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake – impact on macrophyte biodiversity
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake – impact on macrophyte biodiversity
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake – impact on macrophyte biodiversity
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *