Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:42:22.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curriculum Development for Advancing Heritage Language Competence: Recent Research, Current Practices, and a Future Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2010

Kimi Kondo-Brown
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last few decades, research on teaching heritage language (HL) learners has expanded enormously and encouraged language professionals to work toward responsible curriculum development for this specific type of learners. This article suggests ways to expand current curriculum research and practices with the goal of advancing the HL competence of learners. To this end, this article examines the scope, trends, and issues in recent theoretical and practical studies concerning curriculum development for HL learners from various language backgrounds, especially those in the United States. A definition of HL learners is presented first, which is followed by a discussion of general second language curriculum development frameworks with specific reference to HL instruction. Then, the article examines the contexts, challenges, and possibilities for teaching HLs to school-age children in precollegiate programs. Next, it turns to a discussion of issues and recommendations for teaching postsecondary HL students. The article concludes by discussing curricular and pedagogical recommendations for HL professionals as well as a future research agenda that could promote the advancement of HL competence in all educational institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 30 , March 2010 , pp. 24 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (1999). National Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen.Google Scholar
Angelelli, C., & Kagan, O. (2002). Heritage speakers as learners at the superior level: Differences and similarities between Spanish and Russian student populations. In Leaver, B. L. & Shekhtman, B. (Eds.), Developing professional-level language proficiency (pp. 119–140). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, G. H., & Miller, P. C. (Eds.). (2006). Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., & Clark, M. (2004). Issues in placement survey (Networks #40). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW40/SurveyResults.htmlGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. N., & Rosenthal, J. W. (2000). Heritage languages. In Rosenthal, J. W. (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 165–184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. (2007). Teaching Spanish in the U.S.: Beyond the one-size-fits-all paradigm. In Potowski, K. & Cameron, R. (Eds.), Spanish in contact: Policy, social and linguistic inquiries (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chinen, K., & Tucker, G. R. (2006). Heritage language development: Understanding the roles of ethnic identity, schooling and community. In Kondo-Brown, K. (Ed.), Heritage language development: Focus on East Asian immigrants (pp. 89–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Christian, D. (2008). School-based programs for heritage language learners: Two-way immersion. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 257–268). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (1992). Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of “English only.” Massachusetts, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Curriculum guidelines for heritage language classrooms at the University of California (National Heritage Language Focus Group Report). (2003). Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.international.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=24734Google Scholar
Day, R. R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991). Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 541–551.Google Scholar
Delett, J. S., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. A. (2001). A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 559–568.Google Scholar
Dolgova, I. (2008). Placement examination for a heterogeneous group of Russian heritage learners. In Hudson, T. & Clark, M. (Eds.), Case studies in foreign language placement: Practices and possibilities (pp. 99–104). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Domingo, N. P. (2008).Towards a heritage-learner-sensitive Filipino placement test at UCLA. In Hudson, T. & Clark, M. (Eds.), Case studies in foreign language placement: Practices and possibilities (pp. 17–28). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. O. (2005). Pedagogical theories and approaches to teach young learners of Japanese as a heritage language. Heritage Language Journal, 3. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Douglas, M. O. (2008). A profile of Japanese heritage learners and individualized curriculum. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 215–228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ducar, C. M. (2008). Student voices: The missing link in the Spanish heritage language debate. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 415–433.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M. (2006). Language placement exams for heritage speakers of Spanish: Learning from students’ mistakes. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 595–604.Google Scholar
Friedman, D., & Kagan, O. (2008). Academic writing proficiency of Russian heritage speakers. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 181–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gambhir, V. (2008). The rich tapestry of heritage learners of Hindi. South Asia Language Pedagogy and Technology, 1. 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://salpat.uchicago.edu/index.php/salpat/indexGoogle Scholar
Glisan, E. W., & Foltz, D. A. (1998). Assessing students’ oral proficiency in an outcome-based curriculum: Student performance and teacher intuitions. Modern Language Journal, 82, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T. (2008). Measuring the Japanese proficiency of heritage language children. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 77–98). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hayashi, A. (2006). Japanese English bilingual children in three different educational environments. In Kondo-Brown, K. (Ed.), Heritage language development: Focus on East Asian immigrants (pp. 145–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., & Wang, S. C. (2008). Who are our heritage language learners? Identity and biliteracy in heritage language education in the United States. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 3–35). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howard, E. R., Sugarman, J., Christian, D., Lindholm-Leary, K. J., & Rogers, D. (2007). Guiding principles for dual language education (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Husseinali, G. (2006). Who is studying Arabic and why? A survey of Arabic students’ orientations at a major university. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 395–412.Google Scholar
Ilieva, G. N. (2008). Project-based learning of Hindi: Managing the mixed-abilities classroom. South Asia Language Pedagogy and Technology, 1. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://salpat.uchicago.edu/index.php/salpat/indexGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L. (2007). Heritage language reading in the university: A survey of students’ experiences, strategies, and preferences. Heritage Language Journal, 5. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Jo, H.-Y. (2001). “Heritage” language learning and ethnic identity: Korean Americans’ struggle with language authorities. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 14, 26–41.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2005). In support of a proficiency-based definition of heritage language learners: The case of Russian. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8, 213–221.Google Scholar
Kagan, O., & Dillon, K. (2001). A new perspective on teaching Russian: Focus on the heritage learner. Slavic and East European Journal, 45, 507–18.Google Scholar
Kagan, O., & Dillon, K. (2003). Heritage speakers’ potential for high-level language proficiency. In Byrones, H. & Maxim, H. (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 99–112). Boston, MA: Thomson & Heinle.Google Scholar
Kagan, O., & Friedman, D. (2003). Using the OPI to place heritage speakers of Russian. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 536–545.Google Scholar
Kanno, K., Hasegawa, T., Ikeda, K., Ito, Y., & Long, M. H. (2008). Prior language–learning experience and variation in the linguistic profiles of advanced English-speaking learners of Japanese. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 215–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kataoka, H., Furuyama, H., & Koshiyama, Y. (2000). Minami kariforunia nihongo gakuen kyooshi ankeeto kekka bunseki hookokusho [Report on the Southern California Japanese language school teacher survey results]. Retrieved May 15, 2005, from http://www.jflalc.org/teaching/jflc/fclty_rpt/jpz_kyoushi/heritage2.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kataoka, H., Koshiyama, Y., & Shibata, S. (2008). Japanese and English language ability of students at supplementary Japanese schools in the United Status. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 47–76). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kim, H. H.-S. (2008). Heritage and nonheritage learners of Korean: Sentence processing differences and their pedagogical implications. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, Materials, and assessment (pp. 99–134). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kondo, K. (1998). Social-psychological factors affecting language maintenance: Interviews with Shin Nisei university students. Linguistics and Education, 9, 369–408.Google Scholar
Kondo, K. (1999). Motivating bilingual and semibilingual university students of Japanese: An analysis of language learning persistence and intensity among students from immigrant backgrounds. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 77–88.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2003). Heritage language instruction for post-secondary students from immigrant backgrounds. Heritage Language Journal, 1. Retrieved December 30, 2003, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2004). Do background variables predict students’ scores on a proficiency test?: Implications for placing heritage language learners. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2005). Differences in language skills: Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners. Modern Language Journal, 89, 563–581.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2006a). East Asian heritage language proficiency development. In Kondo-Brown, K. (Ed.), Heritage language development: Focus on East Asian immigrants (pp. 243–258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2006b). How do English L1 learners of advanced Japanese infer unknown kanji words in authentic texts? Language Learning, 56, 109–153.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2008). Issues and future agenda for teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage students. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment(pp. 17–44). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2009). Background, motivation, and reading ability of students in university upper-level Chinese, Japanese, and Korean courses. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 179–197.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K., & Fukuda, C. (2008). A separate track for advanced heritage language students?: Japanese intersentential referencing. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 135–156). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lacorte, M. (2005). Teacher beliefs and practices in advanced Spanish classrooms. Heritage Language Journal, 3. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Frawley, W. (1985). Oral-proficiency testing: A critical analysis. Modern Language Journal, 69, 337–345.Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., & Kim, H.-Y. (2008). Heritage language learners’ attitudes, motivations and instructional needs: The case of postsecondary Korean language learners. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 159–186). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., & Shin, S. (2008). Korean heritage language education in the United States: The current state, opportunities, and possibilities. Heritage Language Journal, 6. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Li, D., & Duff, P. (2008). Issues in Chinese heritage language education and research at the postsecondary level. In He, A. W. & Xiao, Y., (Eds.), (Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry (pp. 13–36). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Resource Center.Google Scholar
Li, M. (2005). The role of parents in Chinese heritage-language schools. Bilingual Research Journal 29, 1. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://brj.asu.edu/archive.htmlGoogle Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (1982). ETS oral proficiency testing manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Malone, M. E. (2003). Research on the oral proficiency interview: Analysis, synthesis, and future directions. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 491–497.Google Scholar
Malone, M. E., Rifkin, B., Christian, D., & Johnson, D. (2005). Attaining high levels of proficiency: Challenges for foreign language education in the United States. Center for Applied Linguistics Online Digest. Retrieved January 15, 2006, from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/attain.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mathews, T. J., & Hansen, C. M. (2004). Ongoing assessment of a university foreign language program. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 630–639.Google Scholar
McGinnis, S. (2008). From mirror to compass: The Chinese heritage language education sector in the United Sates. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 215–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McQuillan, J. (1996). How should heritage languages be taught? The effects of a free voluntary reading program. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 56–72.Google Scholar
Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2008). Computer mediated communication: Tools for instructing Russian heritage language learners. Heritage Language Journal, 6. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.heritagelanguages.org/Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Potowski, K. (2007). Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 301–328.Google Scholar
Morioka, A., Takakura, A. H., & Ushida, E. (2008). Developing Web-based multi-level materials for Japanese content-based instruction. Japanese Language and Literature, 42, 361–388.Google Scholar
Nagasawa, F. (1995). L1, L2, bairingaru no nihongo bunpoo nooryoku [Comparative grammatical competence among L1, L2, and bilingual speakers of Japanese]. Nohongo kyooiku, 86, 173–189.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2006). The why (and how) of assessing student learning outcomes in college foreign language programs. Modern Language Journal, 90, 576–583.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Pfeiffer, P. C. (2003). Exploring the uses and usefulness of ACTFL oral proficiency ratings and standards in college foreign language departments. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 572–581.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Omaggio Hardley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S. & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195–224.Google Scholar
Parodi, C. (2008). Stigmatized Spanish inside the classroom and out: A model of language teaching to heritage speakers. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 199–214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Payton, J. K. (2008). Spanish for native speakers’ education: The state of the field. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 243–256). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pearson, L., Fonseca-Greber, B., Foell, K. (2006). Educating foreign language teacher candidates to achieve advanced proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39 (3), 507–519.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008). Heritage language narratives. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 149–164). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2007). Language and identity in a dual immersion school. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Potowski, K., Berne, J., Clark, A. and Hammerand, A. (2008). Spanish for K–8 heritage speakers: A standards-based curriculum project. Hispania, 91, 25–41.Google Scholar
Potowski, K., & Carreira, M. (2004). Towards teacher development and national standards for Spanish as a heritage language. Foreign Language Annals 37, 421–431.Google Scholar
Ranjan, R. (2008). The challenge of placing Hindi heritage students. In Hudson, T. & Clark, M. (Eds.), Case studies in foreign language placement: Practices and possibilities (pp. 177–186). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ricardo-Osorio, J. (2008). A study of foreign language learning outcomes assessment in U.S. undergraduate education. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 590–610.Google Scholar
Rifkin, B. (2003). Oral proficiency learning outcomes and curricular design. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 582–588.Google Scholar
Rifkin, B. (2005). A ceiling effect in traditional classroom foreign language instruction: Data from Russian. Modern Language Journal, 89, 3–18.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P., Rivers, W., & Brecht, R. D. (2006). Speaking foreign languages in the United States: Correlates, trends, and possible consequences. Modern Language Journal, 90, 457–472.Google Scholar
Rubio, F. (2003). Structure and complexity of oral narratives in advanced-level Spanish: A comparison of three learning backgrounds. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 546–554.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R. (2000). Revising the revised format of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Language Testing, 17, 289–310.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, D., & Petrón, M. (2005). Heritage language instruction at the college level: Reality and possibilities. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 568–578.Google Scholar
Shen, H. H. (2003). A comparison of written Chinese achievement among heritage learners in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 258–266.Google Scholar
Sohn, S.-O., & Merrill, C. (2008). The Korean/English dual language program in the Los Angeles unified school district. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 269–288). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sohn, S-O., & Shin, S-K. (2007). True beginners, false beginners, and fake beginners: Placement strategies for Korean heritage speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 407–418.Google Scholar
Takahashi, C. Y. (2008). A case study of Thai language program placement testing: Incorporating news articles into the Thai placement process. In Hudson, T. & Clark, M. (Eds.), Case studies in foreign language placement: Practices and possibilities (pp. 187–197). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R. (2005). Innovative language education programmes for heritage language students: The special case of Puerto Ricans? The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8, 188–195.Google Scholar
Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (1989). Teaching Spanish to Hispanic bilinguals: A Look at oral proficiency testing the proficiency movement. Hispania, 72, 392–401Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (1995). The teaching of minority languages as academic subjects: Pedagogical and theoretical challenges. Modern Language Journal, 79, 299–328.Google Scholar
Valdés, G., & Geoffrion-Vinci, M. (1998). Chicano Spanish: The problem of the “underdeveloped” code in bilingual repertories. Modern Language Journal, 82, 473–501.Google Scholar
Yu, W. H. (2008). Developing a “compromise curriculum” for Korean heritage and nonheritage learners. Issues and future agenda for teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage students. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 187–210). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wang, M. (2003). An ethnographic study of Chinese heritage language education and technological innovations. Journal of National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 1, 69–94.Google Scholar
Webb, J., & Miller, B. (Eds.). (2000). Teaching heritage language learners: Voices from the classroom. Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2008). Chinese “dialect” speakers as heritage language learners: A case study. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 91–106). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-M. (2008). Robust learning for Chinese heritage learners: Motivation, linguistics, and technology. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 271–298). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zamar, S., & Robotham, L. (2008). Placement test and course objectives: The case of the Filipino program at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. In Hudson, T. & Clark, M. (Eds.), Case studies in foreign language placement: Practices and possibilities (pp. 29–38). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Zhang, D., & Davis, N. (2008). Online chat for heritage learners of Chinese. In Kondo-Brown, K. & Brown, J. D. (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp. 299–328). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar