Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:53:00.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Battle of Vercellae and the Alteration of the Heavy Javelin (Pilum) by Gaius Marius – 101 BC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Christopher Matthew
Christopher Matthew*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, christopher.matthew@students.mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gaius Marius (157-86 BC) is widely known as one of the most innovative commanders of the Roman military. In 101 BC Marius implemented an alteration to the design of the heavy legionary javelin (pilum). However, unlike Marius' previous reforms, this modification of an elemental aspect of the Roman legions was not adopted as a standard military practice. An examination of the evidence relating to the reform and of the events surrounding the time of its implementation demonstrates that the benefit of the modification was different from that currently accepted by scholars. Furthermore, the evidence indicates that the reason why this reform failed to be adopted by the legions was not that it provided no clear tactical advantage on the battlefield, but was due to the course of Roman political and military history immediately after it had first been implemented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 44 , November 2010 , pp. 50 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, M.C. and Coulston, J.C.N., Roman Military Equipment irom the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome (London 1993).Google Scholar
Carney, T.F., ‘Notes on Plutarch's Life of Marius’, Classical Quarterly 5.3/4 (1955)201–5.Google Scholar
Carney, T.F. ‘Pila at the battle of Pharsalia’, Classical Review 8.1 (1958) 11–13.Google Scholar
Carney, T.F. ‘A Textual Study of Plutarch's Marius’, Symbolae Osloenses 36 (1960) 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T.F. A Biography of Caius Marius (Chicago 1968).Google Scholar
Connolly, P., Greece and Rome at War (London 1998).Google Scholar
Duff, T.E., Plutarch's Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice (Oxford 1999).Google Scholar
Evans, R.J., Gaius Manus: A Political Biography (Pretoria 1994).Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A.K., The Roman Army at War (Oxford 1996).Google Scholar
Keaveney, A., Sulla: The Last Republican (London 1982).Google Scholar
Keppie, L., The Making of the Roman Army (London 1984).Google Scholar
Kromayer, J. and Veith, G., Heerwesen und Kriegführung der Griechen und Börner (Munich 1963).Google Scholar
Parker, H.M.D., The Roman Legions (New York 1971).Google Scholar
Sabin, P., van Wees, H. and Whitby, M. (eds), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare, Vol. II – Rome: From the Late Republic to the Early Empire (Cambridge 2007).Google Scholar
Sekunda, N.V., Northwood, S. and Simkins, M., Caesar's Legions: The Roman Soldier 753 BC to 117 AD (Oxford 2003).Google Scholar
Stephenson, LP., Roman Infantry Equipment: The Later Empire (Stroud 1999).Google Scholar
Warry, J., Warfare in the Classical World (Norman OK 1980).Google Scholar
Webster, G., The Roman Imperial Army of the First and Second Centuries AD (Norman OK 1998).Google Scholar