Hostname: page-component-8678677fb7-2d78d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-10-06T00:50:59.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship training on the use of clinical decision tools for pharyngitis management among pharmacists and pharmacy trainees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2026

Ahmed Hussain Bhutta
Affiliation:
Riphah International University, Pakistan
Mustafeez Mujtaba Babar*
Affiliation:
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University , Pakistan
Aleena Issac
Affiliation:
Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Ejaz Ahmed Khan
Affiliation:
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University , Pakistan Shifa International Hospitals (Pvt.) Ltd., Islamabad, Pakistan
Tausif Ahmed Rajput
Affiliation:
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University , Pakistan
Farhan Shahid
Affiliation:
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University , Pakistan
*
Corresponding author: Mustafeez Mujtaba Babar; Email: mustafeez.babar@fulbrightmail.org

Abstract

Introduction:

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to rise owing to inappropriate antimicrobial use. In many countries, especially where patients cannot afford repetitive physician consultations, patients self-prescribe antimicrobials even for self-limiting infections like pharyngitis. Well-trained pharmacists capable of effectively managing pharyngitis through clinical decision-making scores (CDS) like Centor/McIsaac score can aid antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). The main aim of the current study was to train pharmacists to apply validated clinical decision criteria (Centor/McIsaac) for the differential assessment of pharyngitis, promote guideline-based antimicrobial dispensing, and evaluate the effectiveness of training.

Methods:

A cross-sectional, interventional study using a combination of convenience sampling and snowball sampling techniques was conducted among pharmacists and clinical pharmacy trainees in Pakistan. Educational material was developed through extensive literature search, and training sessions were conducted at community pharmacies and academic institutes. Knowledge was assessed before and after the training sessions using a self-developed, validated, structured questionnaire.

Results:

Of the 288 participants, majority of the practicing pharmacists at community pharmacies were younger than 30 years of age with an experience of less than 3 years. Most participants demonstrated poor baseline knowledge which imporved significantly following the training intervention, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing the knowledge, beliefs, and perceptions of AMR and AMS.

Discussion:

Microteaching-based continuing professional development interventions can support the clinical competencies of pharmacists. These findings highlight the potential of such training interventions to improve infection management and antimicrobial stewardship and underscore the need for similar tailored programs for other clinical conditions.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Flow diagram showing the research methodology adopted for the current study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participantsTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Box plot showing the distribution of scores (out of 11) based on responses to 11 clinical sign–related questions used to guide antimicrobial use, before and after antimicrobial stewardship training. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), the horizontal line indicates the median, and the marker denotes the mean score. Mean scores increased from 6.41 (preintervention) to 7.94 (postintervention). A statistically significant improvement was observed following the intervention (P < .05).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Box plot showing the distribution of scores (out of 8) before and after antimicrobial stewardship training on responses to 8 questions related to etiology, types and complications of pharyngitis. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), the horizontal line indicates the median, and the marker denotes the mean score. Mean scores increased from 3.81 (preintervention) to 6.19 (postintervention). A statistically significant improvement was observed following the intervention (P < .05).

Figure 4

Table 2. Comparison of pre and posttraining means of beliefs about antibiotic useTable 2 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Bhutta et al. supplementary material

Bhutta et al. supplementary material
Download Bhutta et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.3 KB