Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-md2j5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T21:14:52.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘A Noble Group of Barrows’: Bush Barrow and the Normanton Down Early Bronze Age Cemetery Two Centuries On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Stuart Needham ,
Andrew J Lawson  and
Ann Woodward
Stuart Needham*
Affiliation:
Stuart Needham, Langton Fold, South Harting, Petersfield GU31 5NW, UK. Email: sbowman1@waitrose.com
Andrew J Lawson*
Affiliation:
Andrew Lawson, 29 St Ann Street, Salisbury SP1 2DP, UK. Email: andrew.lawson@tiscali.co.uk
Ann Woodward*
Affiliation:
Ann Woodward, 17 Great Western Road, Dorchester DT1 1UF, UK. Email: annwoodward0@btinternet.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two hundred years after William Cunnington and Sir Richard Colt Hoare’s excavations into Bronze Age barrows on Normanton Down, Wiltshire, we offer a fresh appraisal of this renowned cemetery, which lies within sight of Stonehenge. The paper focuses specifically on burial deposits of Early Bronze Age Period 3, seen as representing a dynastic succession that controlled access to Stonehenge for a while and presided over the ceremonies therein. Pre-eminent are the finds from the Bush Barrow grave group, now housed in the Wiltshire Heritage Museum, Devizes, and still without close parallel. Long-held notions that the skeleton was extended are dispelled; instead, the grave assemblage is reconstructed around the universal crouched inhumation rite of the period, giving rise to important new implications. Special attention is also given to two probable female graves nearby; essentially contemporary, their accompaniments contrast in a number of respects, pointing to very distinct affiliations. Our capacity to reinterpret such burial complexes is a tribute to the records made by the pioneer excavators.

Résumé

Deux cents ans après les fouilles des tumulus de l’âge du bronze de Normanton Down, Wiltshire, effectuées par William Cunnington et Sir Richard Colt Hoare, nous offrons une nouvelle évaluation de ce cimetière renommé, qui se trouve en vue de Stonehenge. Cette communication se concentre spécifiquement sur les dépôts funéraires de l’âge du bronze ancien période 3, dont l’interprétation est qu’ils représentent une succession dynastique laquelle, pendant un certain temps, contrôla l’accès à Stonehenge et présida les cérémonies qui y avaient lieu. Parmi ces dépôts, les découvertes faites dans l’ensemble de sépultures du tumulus de Bush Barrow, qui se trouvent actuellement au Wiltshire Heritage Museum, Devizes, sont prééminentes et encore sans parallèle proche. Des idées de longue date, selon lesquelles le squelette aurait été inhumé en position allongée, sont écartées; à la place, l’ensemble funéraire est reconstruit autour du rite funéraire de l’inhumation en position contractée, qui était universel à l’époque, suscitant d’importantes nouvelles implications. On s’occupe tout particulièrement de deux sépultures féminines probables à proximité; essentiellement contemporaines, leur mobilier funéraire fait contraste à de nombreux égards, indiquant des affiliations très nettes. Notre capacité pour réinterpréter de tels complexes funéraires est due en grande partie aux notes rédigées par ces précurseurs des fouilles.

Zusammenfassung

Zweihundert Jahre nach den Ausgrabungen der Hügelgräber aus der Bronzezeit in der Normanton Down, Grafschaft Wiltshire, die von William Cunnington und Sir Richard Colt Hoare durchgeführt wurden, präsentieren wir eine neue Bewertung dieses berühmten Gräberfeldes, das sich in Sichtweite von Stonehenge befindet. Dieser Bericht konzentriert sich insbesondere auf Grabbeilagen der 3. Periode der Frühen Bronzezeit, die von einer dynastischen Erbfolge gekennzeichnet war, die für eine Weile den Zugang nach Stonehenge kontrollierte und über die dortigen Zeremonien waltete. Besonders hervorstechend sind die Funde aus der Bush Barrow Gräbergruppe, die jetzt im Wiltshire Heritage Museum ausgestellt sind und immer noch ohne gleichen sind. Die lang-gehegte Auffassung daß dieses Skelett ausgestreckt begraben war wurde widerlegt; stattdessen wurden die Grabbeilagen um die, in dieser Periode allgemein üblichen Höckerbestattung, rekonstruktuiert, was wiederum neue Schlussfolgerungen nach sich zieht. Besondere Beachtung wird auch zweien, sich in der Nähe befindlichen, Frauengräbern gegeben; im wesentlichen zeitlich parallel, sind deren Beigaben in vieler Hinsicht verschieden, was auf eine deutlich andere Zugehörigkeit folgern lässt. Unsere Fähigkeit solche Bestattungsanlagen zu neu zu interpretieren ist ein Tribut für die Aufzeichnungen, die von den frühen Pionierausgräbern gemacht wurden.

Type
Articles
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 90 , September 2010 , pp. 1 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unpublished sources

Unpublished a. ‘A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Survey II’, Bradford, GSB Report 92/82, Area 11Google Scholar
Unpublished b. ‘English Heritage Fieldwalking Survey at Stonehenge and Avebury WHS’, Salisbury, Wessex Archaeology Ref 52535.505Google Scholar

Published sources

Abercromby, J 1912. A Study of the Bronze Age Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland and its Associated Grave Goods, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Allen, M 1997. ‘Environment and land-use: the economic development of the communities who built Stonehenge (an economy to support the stones)’, in Cunliffe and Renfrew (eds) 1997, 115–44Google Scholar
Annable, F K Simpson, D D A 1964. Guide Catalogue of the Neolithic and Bronze Age Collections in Devizes Museum, Devizes: Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History SocietyGoogle Scholar
ApSimon, A 1954. ‘Dagger graves in the “Wessex” Bronze Age’, Inst Archaeol, Univ London Annu Rep, 10, 37–61Google Scholar
Ashbee, P 1960. The Bronze Age Round Barrow in Britain, London: PhoenixGoogle Scholar
Ashbee, P 1967. ‘The Wessex grave’, in A Corney, ‘A prehistoric and Anglo-Saxon burial ground, Ports Down, Portsmouth’, Proc Hampshire Field Club Archaeol Soc, 24, 20–41Google Scholar
Ashbee, P 1975/6. Amesbury barrow 51: excavation 1960, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 70/71, 1–60Google Scholar
Ashbee, P 1979/80. ‘Amesbury barrow 39: excavations 1960’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Histage Mag, 74/75, 3–34Google Scholar
Ashbee, P, Bell, M Proudfoot, E 1989. Wilsford Shaft: excavations 1960–62, Engl Heritage Archaeol Rep 11, London: English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R J C 1984. ‘Barrows excavated by William Stukeley near Stonehenge, 1723–4’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 79, 244–246Google Scholar
Barclay, A Halpin, C 1999. Excavations at Barrow Hills, Radley, Oxfordshire. Vol I: the Neolithic and Bronze Age monument complex, Thames Valley Landscapes 11, Oxford: Oxford University Committee for ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T 1848. Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire, London: SmithGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T 1861. Ten Years’ Diggings in Celtic & Saxon Grave Hills, in the Counties of Derby, Stafford, and York, from 1848 to 1858, London: George Allen & SonsGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A, Bronk Ramsey, C McCormac, F G 1997. ‘Dating Stonehenge’, in Cunliffe and Renfrew (eds) 1997, 39–59Google Scholar
Britton, D 1963. ‘Traditions of metal-working in the later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Britain: part 1’, Proc Prehist Soc, 29, 258–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C B 1980. The Age of Stonehenge, London: DentGoogle Scholar
Butler, J J 1979. ‘Rings and ribs: the copper types of the “ingot hoards” of the central European Early Bronze Age’, in The Origins of Metallurgy in Atlantic Europe: proceedings of the fifth Atlantic colloquium (ed M Ryan), 345–362, Dublin: Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, C A 1992. ‘Excavations at Norton Bavant Borrow Pit, Wiltshire, 1987’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 85, 1–26Google Scholar
Case, H (with contributions by P Robinson and A Hopper-Bishop) 2003. ‘Beaker presence at Wilsford 7’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 96, 161–194Google Scholar
Clarke, D L 1970. Beaker Pottery of Britain and Ireland, 2 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R M J Allen, M J 1994. ‘Investigations of tree-damaged barrows on King Barrow Ridge and Luxenborough Plantation, Amesbury’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 87, 54–88Google Scholar
Cleal, R M J, Walker, K E Montague, R 1995. Stonehenge in its Landscape: twentieth-century excavations, Engl Heritage Archaeol Rep 10, London: English HeritageGoogle Scholar
Corfield, M in press. ‘The decoration of Bronze Age dagger handles with gold studs’, in Of Things Gone but not Forgotten: essays in archaeology for Joan Taylor (ed J Trigg), Oxford: ArchaeopressGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B Renfrew, C (eds) 1997. Science and Stonehenge, Proc Brit Acad 92, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Cunnington, R H 1975. From Antiquary to Archaeologist: a biography of William Cunnington, 1754–1810, Princes Risborough: ShireGoogle Scholar
Darvill, T 2006. Stonehenge: the biography of a landscape, Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Darvill, T Wainwright, G 2009. ‘Stonehenge excavations 2008’, Antiq J, 89, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, C D Piggott, S 1936. ‘Two Bronze Age barrows, excavated by Mr Edward Cunnington’, Proc Dorset Natur Hist Archaeol Soc, 58, 18–25Google Scholar
Evans, J 1897. The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons and Ornaments, of Great Britain, 2nd edn, London: Longmans, Green & CoGoogle Scholar
Evans, J, Chenery, C A Fitzpatrick, A P 2006. ‘Bronze Age childhood migration of individuals near Stonehenge, revealed by strontium and oxygen isotope tooth enamel analysis’, Archaeometry, 48, 309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Woodward, A Yorston, R 2000. Stonehenge Landscapes: journeys through real and imagined worlds, Oxford: ArchaeopressGoogle Scholar
Field, E V 1961. ‘Normanton Down’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 58, 30Google Scholar
Fleming, A 1971. ‘Territorial patterns in Bronze Age Wessex’, Proc Prehist Soc, 37 (1), 138–166Google Scholar
Garwood, P 1991. ‘Ritual tradition and the reconstitution of society’, in Sacred and Profane: proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion, Oxford 1989 (eds P Garwood, D Jennings, D Skeates and J Toms), 10–32, Oxford Univ Comm Archaeol Monogr 32, Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Garwood, P 2007. ‘ “Before the hills in order stood”: chronology, time and history in the interpretation of Early Bronze Age round barrows’, in Beyond the Grave: new perspectives on barrows (ed J Last), 30–52, Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Gerloff, S 1975. The Early Bronze Age Daggers in Great Britain, and a Reconsideration of the Wessex Culture, Prähistorische Bronzefunde vi, 2, Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Green, C Rollo-Smith, S 1984. ‘The excavation of eighteen round barrows near Shrewton, Wiltshire’, Proc Prehist Soc, 50, 255–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwell, W Rolleston, G 1877. British Barrows: a record of the examination of sepulchral mounds in various parts of England, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Grimes, W F 1964. ‘Excavations in the Lake Group of barrows, Wilsford, Wiltshire, in 1959’, Bull London Inst Archaeol, 4, 89–121Google Scholar
Grinsell, L V 1957. ‘Archaeological Gazetteer’, in A History of Wiltshire. Volume 1, Part 1 (eds R B Pugh and E Crittall), 21–279, VCH, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Grinsell, L V 1959. Dorset Barrows, Dorchester: Dorset Natural History and Archaeology SocietyGoogle Scholar
Grinsell, L V nd [1978]. The Stonehenge Barrow Groups, Salisbury: Salisbury and South Wiltshire MuseumGoogle Scholar
Harding, A F 1990. ‘The Wessex connection: developments and perspectives’, in Orientalisch-Agäische Einflüsse in der Europäischen Bronzezeit: Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums (ed T Bader), 139–154, Monogr 15, Bonn: Römisch-Germanisches ZentralmuseumGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R C 1812. The Ancient History of South Wiltshire, London: William MillerGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R C 1819. The Ancient History of North Wiltshire, London: William MillerGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I A, Longworth, I A, McIntyre, I M, Needham, S P Oddy, W A 1988. ‘Bush Barrow gold’, Antiquity, 62, 24–39Google Scholar
Kirwan, R 1872. ‘Notes on the pre-historic archaeology of East Devon’, Archaeol J, 29, 151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, J (ed) 2007. Beyond the Grave: new perspectives on barrows, Oxford: OxbowGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A J 1986. ‘The excavation of a round barrow at Little Cressingham, 1977’, in Barrow Excavations in Norfolk 1950–82 (A J Lawson), E Anglian Archaeol Rep 29, 5–19, Gressenhall: Norfolk Archaeological UnitGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A J 2007. Chalkland: an archaeology of Stonehenge and its region, Salisbury: Hobnob PressGoogle Scholar
Leivers, M Moore, C 2008. Archaeology on the A303 Stonehenge Improvement, Salisbury: Wessex ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Longworth, I H 1971. ‘The Neolithic pottery’, in Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968 (G J Wainwright and I H Longworth), Rep Res Comm Soc Antiq London 29, 48–155, London: Society of AntiquariesGoogle Scholar
Longworth, I H 1979. ‘The Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery’, in Mount Pleasant, Dorset: Excavations 1970–1971 (ed G J Wainwright), Rep Res Comm Soc Antiq London 37, 74–124, London: Society of AntiquariesGoogle Scholar
Longworth, I H 1983. ‘The Whinny Liggate perforated wall cup and its affinities’, in From the Stone Age to the ’Forty-Five: studies presented to R B K Stevenson (eds A O’Connor and D V Clarke), 65–86, Edinburgh: John DonaldGoogle Scholar
Lynch, F 1991. Prehistoric Anglesey, 2nd edn, Llangefni: Anglesey Antiquarian SocietyGoogle Scholar
Megaw, J V S Simpson, D D A 1979. Introduction to British Prehistory, Leicester: Leicester University PressGoogle Scholar
Mizoguchi, K 1992. ‘A historiography of a linear barrow cemetery: a structurationist’s point of view’, Archaeol Rev Cambridge, 11 (1), 39–49Google Scholar
Mortimer, J R 1905. Forty Years’ Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds of East Yorkshire, London: Brown & SonsGoogle Scholar
Needham, S 2000. ‘Power pulses across a cultural divide: cosmologically driven exchange between Armorica and Wessex’, Proc Prehist Soc, 66, 151–207Google Scholar
Needham, S 2007. ‘The dagger blade and hilt furnishings from Site D (Ferry Fryston), burial 2245’, in F Brown, C Howard-Davis, M Brennand, A Boyle, T Evans, S O’Connor, A Spence, R Heawood and A Lupton, The Archaeology of the A1 (M) Darrington to Dishforth DBFO Road Scheme, Lancaster Imprints 12, 279–289, Lancaster: Oxford Archaeology NorthGoogle Scholar
Needham, S 2008. ‘Exchange, object biographies and the shaping of identities, 10000–1000 BC’, in Prehistoric Britain (ed J Pollard), Blackwell Stud Global Archaeol, 310–329, Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Needham, S P, Lawson, A J Green, H S 1985. Early Bronze Age Hoards, Brit Bronze Age Metalwork, Ass Finds Ser A1–6, London: British Museum PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Needham, S, Lawson, A Woodward, A 2009. ‘Rethinking Bush Barrow’, Brit Archaeol, Jan/Feb 2009, 13–17Google Scholar
Needham, S, Parfitt, K Varndell, G (eds) 2006. The Ringlemere Cup: precious cups and the beginning of the Channel Bronze Age, Brit Mus Res Pub 163, London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Needham, S Woodward, A 2008. ‘The Clandon Barrow finery: a synopsis of success in an Early Bronze Age world’, Proc Prehist Soc, 74, 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S, Parker Pearson, M, Tyler, A, Richards, M Jay, M 2010. ‘A first “Wessex 1” date from Wessex’, Antiquity, 84, 363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S, Woodward, A Lawson, A in preparation. ‘Changing patterns in Early Bronze Age burials south of Stonehenge’Google Scholar
Olivier, A C H 1987. ‘Excavations of a Bronze Age funerary cairn at Manor Farm, near Borwick, North Lancashire’, Proc Prehist Soc, 53, 129–186Google Scholar
Ó Ríordáin, B Waddell, J 1993. The Funerary Bowls and Vases of the Irish Bronze Age, Galway: Galway University PressGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, M Ramilisonina, 1998. ‘Stonehenge for the ancestors: the stones pass on the message’, Antiquity, 72, 308–326Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M, Cleal, R, Marshall, P, Needham, S, Pollard, J, Richards, C, Ruggles, C, Sheridan, A, Thomas, J, Tilley, C, Welham, K, Chamberlain, A, Chenery, C, Evans, J, Knüssel, C, Linford, N, Martin, L, Montgomery, J, Payne, A Richards, M 2007. ‘The age of Stonehenge’, Antiquity, 81, 617–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggott, S 1938. ‘The Early Bronze Age in Wessex’, Proc Prehist Soc, 4, 52–106Google Scholar
Piggott, S 1973. ‘The Wessex Culture of the Early Bronze Age’, in A History of Wiltshire. Volume 1: Part 2 (ed E Crittall), 352–375, VCH, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
RCHME 1979. Stonehenge and its Environs, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Roe, F E S 1966. ‘The battle-axe series in Britain’, Proc Prehist Soc, 32, 199–245Google Scholar
Roe, F 1979. ‘Typology of stone implements with shaftholes’, in Stone Axe Studies: archaeological, petrological, experimental and ethnographic (eds T H McK Clough and W A Cummins), CBA Res Rep 23, 23–48, London: Council for British ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P K Burgess, C B 1981. The Axes of Scotland and Northern England, Prähistorische Bronzefunde ix, 7, Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, I A G 2009. ‘The V-bored buttons of Great Britain and Ireland’, Proc Prehist Soc, 75, 335–369Google Scholar
Sheridan, A 2007. ‘Appendix 3: the bone belt hook from Bargrennan pit 2’, in V Cummings and C Fowler, From Cairn to Cemetery: an archaeological investigation of the chambered cairns and Early Bronze Age mortuary deposits at Cairnderry and Bargrennan White Cairn, south-west Scotland, BAR Brit Ser 434, 112–124, Oxford: ArchaeopressGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A Davis, M 1998. ‘The Welsh “jet-set” in prehistory’, in Prehistoric Ritual and Religion (eds A Gibson and D Simpson), 148–162, Stroud: SuttonGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A Shortland, A 2004. ‘ “Beads which have given rise to so much dogmatism, controversy and rash speculation”: faience in Early Bronze Age Britain and Ireland’, in Scotland in Ancient Europe: the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Scotland in their European context (eds I A Shepherd and G J Barclay), 263–279, Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Smith, I F 1991. ‘Round barrows Wilsford cum Lake G51–G54: excavations by Ernest Greenfield in 1958’, Wiltshire Archaeol Natur Hist Mag, 84, 11–39Google Scholar
Smith, M A 1956. Inventaria Archaeologica: an illustrated card-inventory of important associated finds in archaeology, Great Britain. 3rd Set: GB.14–18 grave-groups and hoards of the British Bronze Age, London: GarrawayGoogle Scholar
Stukeley, W 1740. Stonehenge, a Temple Restor’d to the British Druids, London: Innys & ManbyGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J J 1980. Bronze Age Goldwork of the British Isles, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Thom, A S, Ker, J M D Burrows, T R 1988. ‘The Bush Barrow gold lozenge: is it a solar and lunar calendar for Stonehenge?’, Antiquity, 62, 492–502Google Scholar
Thurnam, J 1871. ‘On ancient British barrows, especially those of Wiltshire and the adjoining counties (Part II, round barrows)’, Archaeologia, 43, 285–552Google Scholar
Vatcher, F de M 1961. ‘The excavation of the long mortuary enclosure on Normanton Down, Wilts’, Proc Prehist Soc, 37, 160–173Google Scholar
Van de Noort, R 2006. ‘Argonauts of the North Sea – a social maritime archaeology for the 2nd millennium BC’, Proc Prehist Soc, 72, 267–287Google Scholar
Woodward, A 2000. British Barrows: a matter of life and death, Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A 2002. ‘Beads and Beakers: heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age’, Antiquity, 76, 1040–1047Google Scholar
Woodward, A et al in preparation. Ritual in Early Bronze Age Grave GoodsGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Needham supplementary material

Appendix.doc

Download Needham supplementary material(File)
File 94.7 KB