Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.376 Render date: 2022-08-08T08:30:22.551Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Homo sapiens or Castor fiber?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Extract

Following the development of pollen analysis in the earlier part of this century, much effort was devoted to unravelling the sequence of vegetational change during and after the retreat of the last European ice-sheets. The outlines established, questions of causation came to the fore, and the debate focused on factors such as climatic change, rate of species migration from glacial refuges, and natural vegetational succession. In more recent decades, a further factor has been widely investigated, namely the possible influence of humans on the landscape, principally as farmers and smiths. The development and modification of hypotheses is well illustrated by the Elm Decline of the Atlantic period, where climate (Iversen, 1941) or man (Troels-Smith, 1960) and occasionally disease (see refs in Simmons & Tooley, 1981, 134) have been held responsible for a widespread but by no means straightforward decline in elm pollen.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article shows how environmental evidence for European stone age forest clearance may require re-interpretation, and that change need not be attributed only to climate or man. Observations in North America and Europe show the beaver to be a significant agent of land transformation. The authors suggest that both hunters and farmers took advaniage of the opportunities thus presented, and a few hints are provided about their detection and the implications for the Mesolithic and early Neolithic of north-western Europe. J. M. Coles is Professor of European Prehistory at Cambridge and B. J. Orme is Lecturer in Prehistory at Exeter. They are joint directors of the Somerset Levels Project, the source of the ideas for this article.

References

Anon, 1978. Mammals of Algonquin Provincial Park (Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resources).Google Scholar
Ashbee, P, Smith, I. F. & Evans, J. G. 1976. Excavation of three long barrows near Avebury, Wiltshire, Proc. Prehist. Soc” XLV, 207300.Google Scholar
Balaam, N Smith, K. & Wainwright, G. J. 1982. The Shaugh Moor Project: 4th report: Environment, context and conclusion, Proc. Prehist. Soc.., XLVIII, 20378.Google Scholar
Barker, F& Webley, D 1978. (with comment by J. G. Evans). Causewayed camps and Early Neolithic economies in central southern England, Proc. Prehist. Soc., XLIV, 16186. Google Scholar
Bell, M& Limbrey, S (eds). 1982. Archaeological aspects of woodland ecology. BAR, S146 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bŏkŏnyi, S 1975. Vlasac: an early site of dog domestication, in Clason, 1975, 16778.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G. D 1952. Star Carr (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Clason, A.T (ed.). 1975. Archaeozoological studies (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Coles, J.M, Fleming, A. M. & Orme, B. J. 1980. The Baker site: a Neolithic platform, Somerset Levels Papers, 6, 623. Google Scholar
Coles, J.M & Orme, B. J 1982.Beaver in the Somerset Levels: some new evidence, Somerset Levels Papers, 8, 6773.Google Scholar
Coy, J 1982. Woodland mammals in Wessex—the archaeological evidence, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 28796.Google Scholar
Edwards, K.J 1979. Palynological and temporal inference in the context of prehistory, with reference to the evidence from lake and peat deposits, J. Archaeol. Sci., 6 25570.Google Scholar
1982. Man, space and the woodland edge—speculation on the detection and interpretation of human impact in pollen profiles?in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 522.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G 1975. The environment of early man in the British Isles (London).Google Scholar
Evans, J.G French, C. & Leighton, D. 1978. Habitat change in two late-glacial and post-glacial sites in southern Britain: the molluscan evidence, in Limbrey & Evans, 1978, 6374. Google Scholar
Evans, J.G, Limbrey, S & Cleere, H. (eds). The effects of man on the landscape: the Highland Zone (London: CBA).Google Scholar
Evans, P 1975. The intimate relationship: an hypothesis concerning pre-Neolithic land use, in Evans, Limbrey & Cleere, 1975, 438. Google Scholar
Girling, M.A 1982. Fossil insect faunas from forest sites, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 12946. Google Scholar
Girling, M.A & Grieg, J. R. A. 1977. Palaeoecological investigations of a site at Hampstead Heath, London, Nafure 268, 457.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Wateringe, W 1978. The impact of Neolithic man on the landscape in the Netherlands, in Limbrey & Evans, 1978, 13546. Google Scholar
Iversen, J 1941. Landnam: Danmarks Stenalder, Danm. Geol. Unders., II RK. Nr, 66, 168.Google Scholar
Kruk, J 1980. The neolithic settlement of southern Poland. BAR, S93 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kulczycka-Leciejewiczowa, A 1970. The Linear and stroked pottery cultures, in T. Wislanski (ed.). The Neolithic in Poland (Warsaw), 1475. Google Scholar
Limbrey, S 1982. The honeybee and woodland resources, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 27986. Google Scholar
Limbrey, S& Evans, J. G (eds). 1978. The effect of man on the landscape: the Lowland Zone (London: CBA).Google Scholar
Mellars, P.A 1975. Ungulate populations, economic patterns and the mesolithic landscape, in Evans, Limbrey & Cleere, 1975, 4956.Google Scholar
1976. Fire ecology, animal populations and man: a study of some ecological relationships in prehistory. Proc. Prehist. Soc., XLII, 1545. Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J. R 1970. Litiearbandkeramik aus Elsloo und Stein. Nederlands Oudheden 3. Google Scholar
MÜller, H 1964. Die Haustiere der mitteldeutschen Bandkeramiker. Schriften der Sektion fiir Vor- und Friihgeschichte, 17.Google Scholar
Pavlu, L 1977. K metodice analyzy sidlisti s linearni keramikou, Pamatky Archaeologtcke, 68, 555. Google Scholar
Peake, H 1935. The origin of the Kennet peat, Trans. Newbury and District Field Club 7, 11626. Google Scholar
Pennington, W 1975. The effect of Neolithic man on the environment of north-west England: the use of absolute pollen diagrams?in Evans, Limbrey & Cleere, 1975, 7485.Google Scholar
Poplin, F 1975. La faune danubienne d’Armeau (Yonne, France): ses donnees sur ractivite humaine, in Clason, 1975, 17992.Google Scholar
Roosens, H& Lux, G. v. 1969. Een nederzetting uit der ijzertijd op de staberg te Rosmeer, Arch. Belgica, 190.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P 1982. Forest grazing and clearance in temperate Europe with special reference to Denmark: an archaeological view, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 199215.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P 1982. Forest grazing and clearance in temperate Europe with special reference to Denmark: an archaeological view, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 199215.Google Scholar
Ščeglova, V. V 1975. Einige Angaben Über die altesten Haustiere Belorusslands, in Clason, 1975, 193205.Google Scholar
Simmons, I & Tooley, M. (eds). 1981. The environment in British prehistory (London).Google Scholar
Sims, R .E 1978. Man and vegetation in Norfolk, in Limbrey & Evans, 1978, 5762.Google Scholar
SjØvold, T(ed.). 1982. Introduksjonen av Jordbruk i Nor den (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi).Google Scholar
Smith, A. G 1970. The influence of mesolithic and neolithic man on British vegetation: a discussion, in (eds) D. Walker & R. G. West, Studies in the vegetational history of the British Isles (Cambridge), 8196.Google Scholar
1981, Palynology of a mesolithic-neolithic site in co. Antrim N. Ireland, Fourth Internat. Palynology Conference (Lucknow), vol.3 (1976–77), 24857.Google Scholar
Soudsky, B 1974. Les fouilles protohistoriques dans la Vallee de l’Aisne, Vol.2 (Paris).Google Scholar
Spratt, D & Simmons, I 1976. Prehistoric activity and environment on the North York Moors, J. Archaeol. Sci., 3, 193210.Google Scholar
Strickland, D .N.D Algonquin spruce bog ecology. Spruce bog boardwalk (Min. INatural Resources, Canada). Google Scholar
Thomas, K .D 1982. Neolithic enclosures and woodland habitats on the South Downs in Sussex?England, in Bell & Limbrey, 1982, 14771.Google Scholar
Troes-smith, J 1960. Ivy, mistletoe and elm: climatic indicators fodder plants: a contribution to the interpretation of the pollen zone border VII–VIII, Danm. GeoL Unders” IV KH, Nr 4, 132. Google Scholar
Welten, M 1982. Vegetationsgeschichtliche Unter- suchungen in den westlichen Schweizer Alpen: Bem-Wallis, Mem. Soc. Helvetique Sci. Naturelle, 95, 7104.Google Scholar
Woodman, P 1978. The Mesolithic in Ireland’ BAR 58(Oxford)Google Scholar
Wymer, J. J 1962. Excavations at the Maglemosian sites at Thatcham, Berkshire, England, Proc. Prehist. Soc.y XXVIII, 32961.Google Scholar
19
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Homo sapiens or Castor fiber?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Homo sapiens or Castor fiber?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Homo sapiens or Castor fiber?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *