Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology

  • Alfredo González-Ruibal (a1), Pablo Alonso González (a2) and Felipe Criado-Boado (a1)
Extract

From Brazil to the United Kingdom, 2016 was a critical year in global politics. Heritage, ethics and the way that archaeologists relate to the public were and will all be affected, and it is time to reflect critically on the phenomenon of ‘reactionary populism’ and how it affects the practice and theory of archaeology. ‘Reactionary populism’ can be defined as a political form that is anti-liberal in terms of identity politics (e.g. multiculturalism, abortion rights, minority rights, religious freedom), but liberal in economic policies. It is characterised by nationalism, racism and anti-intellectualism, and as Judith Butler states in a recent interview, it wants “to restore an earlier state of society, driven by nostalgia or a perceived loss of privilege” (Soloveitchik 2016). Our intention here is to argue that the liberal, multi-vocal model of the social sciences and the humanities is no longer a viable option. Instead, we ask our colleagues to embrace an archaeology that is ready to intervene in wider public debates not limited to issues of heritage or of local relevance, is not afraid of defending its expert knowledge in the public arena, and is committed to reflective, critical teaching.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence (Email: pabloag10@hotmail.com)
References
Hide All
ACHS Association of the Critical Heritage Studies. n.d. Available at: http://www.criticalheritagestudies.org/ (accessed 24 October 2017).
Alonso González, P. 2016. Between certainty and trust: boundary-work and the construction of archaeological epistemic authority. Cultural Sociology 10: 483501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516640569
Angelbeck, B. & Grier, C.. 2012. Anarchism and the archaeology of anarchic societies: resistance to centralization in the Coast Salish region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Current Anthropology 53: 547–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/667621
Atalay, S., Clauss, L.R., McGuire, R.H. & Welch, J.R. (ed.). 2014. Transforming archaeology: activist practices and prospects. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Bartoy, K.M. 2012. Teaching through rather than about: education in the context of public archaeology, in Skeates, R., McDavid, C. & Carman, J. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of public archaeology: 552–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0029
Brass, T. 2017. Who these days is not a subaltern? The populist drift of global labor history. Science & Society 81: 1034. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2017.81.1.10
Cleary, K., Frolík, J., Krekovič, E., Parga-Dans, E. & Prokopiou, E.S.. 2014. Responding to the financial crisis in five European countries: people, roles, reactions and initiatives in archaeology. Archaeologies 10: 211–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-014-9259-2
Criado-Boado, F. 2001. Problems, functions and conditions of archaeological knowledge. Journal of Social Archaeology 1: 126–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/146960530100100109
Dauvé, G. 2009. Contribution à la critique de l'autonomie politique. Lettre de Troploin 9: 145.
El Mundo. 2016. Pokémon Go dinamiza los museos. 5 September 2016. Available at: http://www.elmundo.es/cataluna/2016/09/01/57c7f51f22601d9e6d8b45a1.html (accessed 23 October 2017).
Fowles, S. 2016. The perfect subject. Journal of Material Culture 21: 927. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183515623818
Fraser, N. 2017. The end of progressive neoliberalism. Dissent, 2 January 2017. Available at: https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/progressive-neoliberalism-reactionary-populism-nancy-fraser (accessed 23 October 2017).
Gnecco, C. 2015. An entanglement of sorts: archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism, in Gnecco, C. (ed.) Ethics and archaeological praxis: 117. New York: Springer.
González-Ruibal, A. (ed.). 2013. Reclaiming archaeology: beyond the tropes of modernity. London: Routledge.
Gramsci, A. 2011. Prison notebooks. Volume 3. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grosfoguel, R. 2008. Transmodernity, border thinking and global coloniality. Decolonizing political economy and postcolonial studies. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 80: 115–47. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.697
Guldi, J. & Armitage, D.. 2014. The history manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139923880
Hall, M. & Bombardella, P.. 2005. Las Vegas in Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology 5: 524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605305050141
Hamilakis, Y. 2011. Archaeological ethnography: a multitemporal meeting ground for archaeology and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 399414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145732
Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: critical approaches. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602001.013.021
Holtorf, C. 2007. Can you hear me at the back? Archaeology, communication and society. European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 149–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957108095982
Hutchings, R. & La Salle, M.. 2015. Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 699720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-015-0308-3
Latour, B. 2013. An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Lowenthal, D. 1996. Possessed by the past: the heritage crusade and the spoils of history. New York: Free Press.
McGuire, R. 2008. Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Merriman, N. (ed.). 2004. Public archaeology. London: Routledge.
Pluciennik, M. 2015. Authoritative and ethical voices. From diktat to the demotic, in Dyke, R. Van & Bernbeck, R. (ed.) Subjects and narratives in archaeology: 5582. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
Schlanger, N. & Aitchison, K. (ed.). 2010. Archaeology and the global economic crisis: multiple impacts, possible solutions. Tervuren: Culture Lab.
Shepherd, N. & Haber, A.. 2011. What's up with WAC? Archaeology and ‘engagement’ in a globalized world. Public Archaeology 10 (2): 96115. https://doi.org/10.1179/175355311X13086617126567
Sloterdijk, P. 2001. El desprecio de las masas: ensayos sobre las luchas culturales de la sociedad moderna. Valencia: Pre-textos.
Smith, C. & Wobst, H.M. (ed.). 2004. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonising theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Smith, L. 2006. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
Soloveitchik, R. 2016. Judith Butler: ‘Trump is emancipating unbridled hatred’. Zeit Online, 28 October 2016. Available at: http://www.zeit.de/kultur/2016-10/judith-butler-donald-trump-populism-interview/seite-2 (accessed 23 October 2017).
Spivak, G.C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?, in Williams, P. & Chrisman, L. (ed.) Colonial and postcolonial theory: 271313. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waterton, E. & Smith, L.. 2010. The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671
Winter, T. 2013. Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19: 532–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.720997
Žižek, S. 2002. A plea for Leninist intolerance. Critical Inquiry 28 (2): 542–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/449051
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed