Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Chlorine-36 dating and the bluestones of Stonehenge

  • Olwen Williams-Thorpe (a1), D. Graham Jenkins (a2), Judith Jenkins (a2) and John S. Watson (a1)
Abstract

The bluestones of Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain continue to attract controversy. New dates on Stonehenge material using the Chlorine-36 method have been reported as evidence that the bluestones were moved from their Welsh sources by human transport, not by glaciation. Here Olwen Williams-Thorpe and colleagues, who have argued for the glacial transport theory, show that the Chlorine-36 dates have been misinterpreted.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bowen, D.Q. 1994. Late Cenozoic Wales and south-west England, Proceedings of the Ussher Society 8: 209–13.
Bowen, D.Q., Phillips, F.M. & Elmore, D. 1994. Chlorine-36 dating British ice-sheets, Abstracts of the American Geophysics Union, 1994 Fall Meeting: 226.
British Archaeology. 1995. Dating gives clue to Stonehenge riddle, British Archaeology 1 (February).
Hawkes, N. 1994. Stonehenge dating dispels icesheet theory, The Times: 5 December 1994.
Phillips, F.M., Zreda, M.G., Smith, S.S., Elmore, D., Kubik, P.W., Dorn, R.I. & Roddy, D.J. 1991. Age and geomorphic history of Meteor Crater, Arizona, from cosmogenic 36Cl and 14C in rock varnish, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55: 2695–8.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed