Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:10:24.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extensification and intensification in central California prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

J. M. Beaton
J. M. Beaton*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The central portion of the California ‘culture area’ is a microcosm of the larger California province, which is a patchwork of landforms, microclimates and hydraulic régimes. There are large coastal bays, rugged scrubby foothills, broad intermontane valleys with massive river systems and extensive deltaic wetlands (FIGURE 1).

Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 249 , December 1991 , pp. 946 - 952
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, K. 1981. The evolution of social ranking on the Northwest Coast of North America, American Antiquity 46: 789–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basgall, M. 1987. Resource intensification among hunter-gatherers: acorn economies in prehistoric California, Research in Economic Anthropology 9: 21–52.Google Scholar
Baumhoff, M.A. 1963. Ecological determinants of Aboriginal California populations, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49: 155–236.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & King, T.F. (ed.). 1974. ?Antap: California Indian politicai and economic organization. Ramona: Ballena Press. Anthropological Papers 2.Google Scholar
Beardsley, R.K. 1948. Culture sequences in central California archaeology, American Antiquity 14(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, R.K. 1954. Temporal and areal relationships in central California archaeology, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 24, 25.Google Scholar
Beaton, J.M. 1983. Does intensification account for changes in the Australian Holocene record? Archaeology in Oceania 18: 94–7.Google Scholar
Beardsley, R.K. 1990. The importance of past population for prehistory, in Meehan, B. & White, N. (ed.), Hunter gatherer demography, past and present: 23–40. Sydney: Oceania. Monograph 39.Google Scholar
Beardsley, R.K. 1991. Colonizing continents: some problems from Australia and America, in Dillehay, T. & Meitzer, D. (ed.), Peopling of the New World: problems, processes and prospects: 209–30. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, R.K. In press. Intensification in Australian Prehistory, Encyclopaedia of Aboriginal Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1971 Mortuary practices: their study and their potential, in Brown, J. (ed.), Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices: 6–29. Washington (DC): Society for American Archaeology. Memoir 25.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. 1964. The conditions of agricultural growth. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Bouey, P. 1986. The intensification of hunter-gatherer economics: the archaeology of change and complexity in the North Coast ranges of California. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Bouey, P. 1987. The intensification of hunter-gatherer economies in the southern North Coast Ranges of California, Research in Economic Anthropology 9: 53–101.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. 1967. On the relationship between size of population and complexity of social organization, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 23: 234–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, R. 1970. A theory of the origin of the state, Science 169: 733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, M. 1977. The food crisis in prehistory. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. 1981. Pacific coast foragers: affluent or overcrowded? in Koyama, S. & Thomas, D.H. (ed.), Affluent foragers: Pacific coast east and west.: 275–95. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. Senri Ethnological Studies 9.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. 1985. Prehistoric hunter-gatherers; the meaning of social complexity, in Price & Brown (ed.): 99–119.Google Scholar
Cowgill, G. 1975. On causes and consequences of ancient and modern population changes, American Anthropologist 77: 505–25.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D.A. 1974a. Cultural diversity in central California: a view from the North Coast ranges, Journal of California Anthropology 1(1): 41–54.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D.A. 1974b. Social change in prehistory: a central California example, in Bean & King (ed.): 57–73.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1985. ‘Now let’s invent agriculture …’: a critical review of concepts of complexity among hunter-gatherers, in Price & Brown (ed.): 427–42.Google Scholar
Heizer, R.F. & Baumhoff, M. 1956. California settlement patterns, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 23: 32–44.Google Scholar
King, L.B. 1969. The Medea Creek cemetery (4-Lan-243): an investigation of social organization from mortuary practices, UCLA Archaeological Survey Annual Report 11: 23–68.Google Scholar
King, T.F. 1974. The evolution of status ascription around San Francisco Bay, in Bean & King (ed.): 35–54.Google Scholar
Lillard, J.B., Heizer, R.F. & Fenenga, F. 1939. An introduction to the archaeology of central California. Sacramento (CA): Sacramento Junior College, Department of Anthropology. Bulletin 1.Google Scholar
Lourandos, H. 1983. Intensification: a late Pleistocene-Holocene sequence from in southwestern Victoria, Archaeology in Oceania 18: 81–97.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A.L. 1954. The nature of land-holding groups in aboriginal California, University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 56:19–58.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. & Haynes, V. 1970. The Borax lake site revisited, Science 167: 1213–21.Google Scholar
Moratto, M. 1984. California archaeology. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J.F. & Hawkes, K. 1981. Alyawara plant use and optimal foraging theory, in Winterhaider, B. & Smith, E. (ed.), Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies: ethnographic and archaeological analyses: 99–125. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Price, D. & Brown, J. (ed.). 1985. Prehistoric hunter gatherers: the emergence of cultural complexity New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saxe, A. 1968. Explaining variability in disposal of the dead: social relationship factors. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Santa Fe.Google Scholar