We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
[1] Dumitrescu, V. Dacia, 1 (1924), 325–342;Google Scholar Dacia, II (1925), 29–103.
[2] Our report on the researches of i960 is still unpublished.
[3] Makarenko, N. IPEK, 1927, 119.Google Scholar
[4] Dumitrescu, V. Raport asupra activităpi ştiinţifice a Muzeului Naţional de Antichităfi in anii 1942 şi 1943, Bucureşti, 1944, 84–87, fig. 16.Google Scholar
[5] Vasič, M.M. Preistoriska Vinča, 3, figs. 554, 556, etc.Google Scholar
[6] Vasč, M.M. Annual of the British School at Athens, 14, 328,Google Scholar fig. 7; Preistoriska Vinič, 11, fig. 323 a-b and 154; ibid., m, fig. 549 a-c and 119.
[7] Dumitrescu, V. Studii śi cercetäri de istorie veche, 7 (1956), 95–118;Google Scholar VIII (1957), 307–309.
[8] The most recent discovery representing the twin female divinity was made in 1962 at Hüyük, Çatal in Anatolia, by Mellaart, James (Anatolian Studies, 13, 1963, 43–103, pi. XX (d)).Google Scholar Could it not still be an image of the divine couple with breasts marked on both figures?
