Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Imaging and imagining the Neanderthal: the role of technical drawings in archaeology

  • David Van Reybrouck (a1)
Abstract

Reconstruction drawings intended to illustrate the realities of prehistoric life can be famously revealing of preconceptions in the minds of the modern illustrator and of the researcher who briefs the illustrator. But are the less interpretative drawings whose purpose is to record the material evidence more neutral in their look? Nineteenth-century technical illustrations of the Neanderthal skull are unintentionally revealing of attitude.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bach, H. 1957. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Paläoanthropologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Neandertal-Fundes (1856) und dessen Beurteilung im 19. Jahrhundert. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Friedrich Schiller Universität, Jena.
Blake, C.C. 1864. On the alleged peculiar characters and assumed antiquity of the human cranium from the Neanderthal, Journal of the Anthropological Society 2:13957.
Bowler, PJ. 1986. Theories of human evolution: a century of debate, 1844-1944. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bradley, R. 1997. ‘To see is to have seen’: craft traditions in British field archaeology, in Molyneaux (ed.): 6272.
Burtt, F. 1987. ‘Man The Hunter’: bias in children’s archaeology books, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6:15774.
Cohen, C. 1994. Le destin du mammouth. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Daston, L. & Galison, P. 1992. The image of objectivity, Representations 40: 81128.
Davis, B. 1864. De la valeur réelle de la forme spéciale d’un fragment de crâne trouvé dans la caverne de Néanderthal, Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 5: 70818.
Desmond, A. 1994. Huxley, the devil’s disciple. London: Michael Joseph.
Dyer, J. 1978. Worthington George Smith, Bedfordshire Historical Record Society 57: 14179.
Erickson, P.A. 1974. The origins of physical anthropology. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Connecticut.
Ford, B. 1992. Images of Science: A History of scientific illustration. London: Oxford University Press.
Fyke, G. & Law, J. (ed.). 1988. Picturing power: visual depiction and social relations. London: Routledge.
Gamble, C. 1992. Figures of fun: theories about cavemen. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 11: 35772.
Gould, S.J. 1983. The mismeasure of Man. New York (NY): Norton.
Gray, H. 1858. Anatomy, descriptive and surgical. 5th edition [1870]. Philadelphia (PA): H.G. Lea.
Grayson, D.K. 1983: The establishment of human antiquity. New York (NY): Academic Press.
Hammond, J.H. & J.Austin, . 1987. The camera lucida in art and science. Bristol: Hilgor.
Hurcombe, L. 1995. Our own engendered species. Antiquity 69: 87100.
Huxley, T.H. 1863. Evidence as to Man’s place in nature. London: Williams & Norgate.
James, S. 1997. Drawing inferences: visual reconstruction in theory and practice, in Molyneaux (ed.): 2248.
King, W. 1864. The reputed fossil man of the Neanderthal, Quarterly Journal of Science 1: 8897.
Latour, B. 1988. Opening one eye while closing the other ... a note on some religious paintings, in Fyfe, & Law, (ed.): 1538.
Latour, B. 1990. Drawing things together, in Lynch, & Woolgar, (ed.): 1968.
Lyell, C. 1863. Geological evidences of the antiquity of man. London: Murray.
Lynch, M. 1991. Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs, Biology and Philosophy 6: 20526.
Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (ed.). 1990. Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Mayer, A.F. 1864. Über die fossilen Überreste eines menschlichen Schädels und Skeletes in einen Felsenhohle des Düssel- oder Neanderthales, Müller’s Archiv 1: 126.
Molyneaux, B.L. (ed.). 1997. The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Moser, S. 1992. The visual language of archaeology: a case study of the Neanderthals, Antiquity 66: 83144.
Moser, S. 1996. Visual representation in archaeology: depicting the missing-link in human origins, in Baigrie, B.S. (ed.), Picturing knowledge: historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science: 184214. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Moser, S. & Gamble, C. 1997. Revolutionary images: the iconic vocabulary for representing human antiquity, in Molyneaux, (ed.): 184212.
Pruner-Bey, F. 1863. Homme fossile — Mâchoire d’Abbeville, Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 4: 298307.
Quatrefages, A. De & Hamy, E.T. 1873-82. Crania ethnica: les crânes des races humaines décrits et figurés d’aprés les collections du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris, de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris et les principales collections de la France et de l’étranger. Paris: Baillière.
Richard, N. 1992. L’invention de la préhistoire. Une anthologie. Paris: Presses Pocket.
Roberts, K.B. & Tomlinson, J.D.W. 1992. The fabric of the body: European traditions of anatomical illustration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rudwick, M.J.S. 1992. Scenes from deep time: early pictorial representations of the prehistoric world. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
Schaaffhausen, H. 1858. Zur Kenntniss der ältesten Rassenschädel, Archiv Verbindung Mchreren Gelehrten: 45388.
Schaaffhausen, H. 1861. On the crania of the most ancient races of man, Natural History Review 1: 15572. (Schaaffhausen, (1858) translated and further illustrated by Busk, George)
Schaaffhausen, H. 1863. Sur le crâne de Néanderthal, Bulletins de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris 4: 31417.
Shapin, S. 1984. Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology, Social Studies of Science 14: 481520.
Smith, W.G. 1894, Man, the primeval savage: his haunts and relics from the hill-tops of Bedfordshire to Blackwall. London: Stanford.
Spencer, F. 1984. The Neanderthals and their evolutionary significance: a brief historical survey, in Smith, F.H. & Spencer, F. (ed.), The origin of modern humans: a world survey of fossil evidence: 149. New York (NY): Alan R. Liss.
Stoczkowski, W. 1990. Homme préhistorique et imagination conditionnée, in Lagardère, G. (ed.), Peintres d’un monde disparu: 6171. Solutré: Musée Départemental de Préhistoire Solutré.
Stoczkowski, W. 1997. The painter and prehistoric people: a ‘hypothesis on canvas’, in Molyneaux, (ed.): 24962.
Stringer, C. & Gamble, C. 1993. In search of the Neanderthals: solving the puzzle of human origins. London: Thames & Hudson.
Theunissen, B. 1989. Eugène Dubois and the Ape-Man from Java: the history of the first ‘missing link’ and its discoverer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Trinkaus, E. & Shipman, P. 1993. The Neandertals: changing the image of mankind. London: Jonathan Cape.
Van Riper, A.B. 1993. Men among the mammoths: Victorian science and the discovery of human antiquity. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
Verhoogt, R. 1996. ‘En nu nog een paar woorden business’: reprodukties naar het werk van Alma-Tadema, Jong Holland 12: 2233.
Virchow, R. 1872. Untersuchung des Neanderthal-Schädels, Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte: 15765.
Wendt, H. 1971. Der Affe steht auf: eine Bilddokumentation zur Vorgeschichte des Menschen. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed