Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-z2nk8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-05T00:00:59.441Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Newborn twins from prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia: birth, death and personhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not possible as this article does not have html content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Double infant burials in unusually high numbers occurred at Khok Phanom Di during a phase associated with immigration and some evidence of early agricultural practices. A study of their stratigraphic context and relative ages led to the interpretation that these were twins. Through an exploration of the medical and anthropological literature of twins, and in conjunction with their mortuary context, the authors conclude that these babies died of natural causes at, or soon after, birth.

Type
Research article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>;.
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>;.

References

Alexander, G.R. & Salihu, H.M.. 2005. Perinatal outcomes of singleton and multiple births in the United States, 1995-98, in Blickstein, I. & Keith, L.G. (ed.) Multiple pregnancy: epidemiology, gestation and perinatal outcome: 310. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, J.L. 1971. The people of Lerna: analysis of a prehistoric Aegean population, Princeton (NJ): American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Ball, H.L. & M, C..HILL. 1996. Re-evaluating ‘twin infanticide’. Current Anthropology 37: 856–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Tayles, N., Higham, C.F.W., Macpherson, C. & Atkinson, T.C.. 2007. Shifting gender relations at Khok Phanom Di, Thailand: isotopic evidence from the skeletons. Current Anthropology 48: 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, J.A. 1990. The paradox of gender: power and difference in Island Southeast Asia, in Atkinson, J.M. & Errington, S. (ed.) Power and difference: gender in Island Southeast Asia: 209–34. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boric, D. & Stefanovic, S.. 2004. Birth and death: infant burials from Vlasac and Lepenski Vir. Antiquity 78: 526–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolus, R., Parazzini, F., Chatenoud, L., Benzi, G., Bianchi, M. & Marini, A.. 1999. The epidemiology of multiple births. Human Reproduction Update 5: 179–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branum, A.M. & Schoendorf, K.C.. 2003. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 101: 570–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D.M. 1998. Epidemiology of twinning. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 8: 126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappel, T.J. H. 1974. The Yoruba cult of twins in historical perspective. Africa, Journal of the International African Institute 44: 250–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corney, G. 1975. Mythology and customs associated with twins, in Macgillivray, I., Nylander, P.P.S. & Corney, G. (ed.) Human multiple reproduction: 115. London: W. B.|Saunders.Google Scholar
Crespo, L., Subirá, M.E. & Ruiz, J.. 2011. Twins in prehistory: the case from Olérdola (Barcelona, Spain; s. IV II BC). International Journal of Osteoarchaeology: 21: 751–56.Google Scholar
Errington, S. 1987. Incestuous twins and the house societies of insular Southeast Asia. Cultural Anthropology 2: 403–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C.S. 1945. A comparative study of human reproduction (Yale University Publications in Anthropology 32). New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, R. 2000. Archaeological biographies: realizing human lifecycles, -courses and -histories. World Archaeology 31: 325–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldschmidt, W. 1973. Guilt and pollution in Sebei ‘mortuary rituals’. Ethos 1: 75105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granzberg, G. 1973. Twin infanticide: a cross-cultural test of a materialistic explanation. Ethos 1: 405–12. doi: 10.1525/eth.1973.1.4.02a00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. 2006. Subadult health and disease in late prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Otago.Google Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. & Tayles, N.. 2008. The bioarchaeological investigation of childhood and social age: problems and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15: 190215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. 2011. The bioarchaeological investigation of children and childhood, in Agarwal, S.C. & Glencross, B. (ed.) Social bioarchaeology: 333–60. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcrow, S.E., Tayles, N. & Livingstone, V.. 2008. Infant death in prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 47: 371404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. G. 2003. Twinning. The Lancet 362: 735–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higham, C W, F.. & Bannanurag, R. (ed.). 1990. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 1: the excavation, chronology and human burials (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 50). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, C.F.W. & Thosarat, R.. 1994. Khok Phanom Di: prehistoric adaptation to the world's richest habitat. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Higham, C.F.W. & Thosarat, R. 2004. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 7: summary and conclusions (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 62). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Jeanty, P. & Romero, R.. 1984. Obstetrical ultrasound. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kamp, K.A. 2001. Where have all the children gone? The archaeology of childhood. Journal of Archaeological Method & Theory 8: 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiely, J.L. 1990. The epidemiology of perinatal mortality in multiple births. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 66: 618–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, S.J., Jackson, R. & Croughan-Minihane, M.S.. 1996. Perinatal mortality in twins and singletons matched for gestational age at delivery at = 30 weeks. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 174: 6671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layde, P.D., Erickson, J.D., Falek, A. & Mccarthy, B.J.. 1980. Congenital malformation in twins. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 662–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Madrigal, L., Saenz, G., Chavez, M. & Dykes, D.. 2001. Frequency of twinning in two Costa Rican ethnic groups: an update. American Journal of Human Biology 13: 220–26.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J.A. & Park, M.M.. 1999. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980–1997. National Vital Statistics Reports 47: 120.Google Scholar
Mason, G.M. 1991. The molluscan remains, in Higham, C.F.W. & Bannanurag, R. (ed.) The excavation of Khok Phanom Di. Volume 2: the biological remains (Part 1) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 48): 249319. London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Matte, U., Leroux, M.G., Benichou, B., Moisan, J.P. & Guiugliani, R.. 1996. Study of possible increase in twinning rate at a small village in south Brazil. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma) 45: 431–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mays, S.A. 1993. Infanticide in Roman Britain. Antiquity 67: 883–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, N., Helms, P.J. & Smyth, R.L. (ed.). 2003. Forfar and Arneil's textbook of pediatrics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Moorrees, C.A.F., Fanning, E.A. & Hunt, E.E.. 1963. Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21: 205–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murail, P., Maureille, B., Peresinotto, D. & Geus, F.. 2004. An infant cemetery of the Classic Kerma period (1750-1500 BC, Island of Sa¨ı, Sudan). Antiquity 78: 267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylander, P.S.P. 1969. The frequency of twinning in a rural community in western Nigeria. Annals of Human Genetics 33: 4144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, M. 1998. Ancient DNA and the people of Khok Phanom Di. Unpublished Master of Arts dissertation, University of Otago.Google Scholar
Pector, E.A. 2002. Twin death and mourning worldwide: a review of the literature. Twin Research and Human Genetics 5: 196205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinzel, A.G.A.L., Smith, D.W. & Miller, J.R.. 1979. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. The Journal of Pediatrics 95: 921–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shek, Y., Huang, A., Shek, Y. & Keith, L.. 1997. Secular rates of twinning in Asia: recent observations and review of literature. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 23: 407–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitz, L. & Kiely, E.M. 2003. Conjoined twins. Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 1307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, E.A. 2000. Exploring twins: towards a social analysis of twinship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarPubMed
Tayles, N. 1996. Anemia, genetic diseases, and malaria in prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101: 1127.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayles, N. 1999. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 5: the people (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 61). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.B. 1996. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 4: subsistence and environment: the botanical remains (Part II) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 53). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Vincent, B.A. 2004. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 4: the material culture (Part II) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 70). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar