Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:01:05.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Textiles, basketry and cordage from the Early Neolithic settlement of La Marmotta, Lazio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2023

Mario Mineo
Affiliation:
Museo delle Civiltà di Roma, Rome, Italy
Niccolò Mazzucco
Affiliation:
Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del Sapere, Pisa, Italy
Mauro Rottoli
Affiliation:
Laboratorio di Archeobiologia dei Musei Civici di Como, Como, Italy
Gerard Remolins
Affiliation:
Università di Bari & ISPC-CNR, Bari, Italy
Laura Caruso-Ferme
Affiliation:
Instituto Patagónico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas (IPCSH-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Provincia del Chubut, Argentina
Juan F. Gibaja*
Affiliation:
Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma (EEHAR-CSIC), Rome, Italy
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ juan.gibaja@eehar.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological investigation of Circum-Alpine lake, or pile, dwellings has afforded unprecedented insight into Neolithic and Bronze Age societies. The discovery in 1989 of a submerged settlement near Rome added an early (eighth millennium BP) geographical outlier to this distribution. Two decades of excavation at La Marmotta have identified more than a dozen dwellings and an enormous assemblage of organic remains. Here, the authors present an overview of the textiles, basketry and cordage recovered, and the tools used to manufacture them. The assemblage paints a more complete picture of the technological expertise of Neolithic societies and their ability to exploit and process plant materials to produce a wide range of crafts.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

The importance of textiles, basketry and cordage within prehistoric societies is inversely proportional to their presence in the archaeological record. Various taphonomic processes typically deprive us of evidence for these essential ancient technologies, leading to an archaeological emphasis on objects made of stone, ceramic and other durable materials, such as shell. The infrequent preservation of artefacts made of plant and animal products, such as wood, wool and flax, may lead archaeologists to underestimate the technological sophistication of past societies, and the extent of their knowledge and exploitation of their environments. Yet, the use of these technologies was integral to prehistoric life—perhaps even defining. The Neolithic, for example, could be seen as a key period of human history, not purely because of the revolutionary effects of plant and animal domestication, but also because of a new dominance over the environment and the acquisition of knowledge about the processing and utilisation of raw materials. For this reason, the Neolithic has been suggested to have been a ‘Wood Age’ as much as a ‘New Stone Age’ (Bocquet & Noël Reference Bocquet and Noël1985).

In this article, we provide an overview of a rare assemblage of basketry, cordage and textile remains, and some of the tools used to manufacture them, recovered from the submerged Early Neolithic site of La Marmotta, in the comune of Anguillara Sabazia, approximately 30km north-west of Rome, Italy.

Early evidence for the manufacture of textiles, basketry and cordage

Palaeolithic sites have yielded some of the earliest evidence for the production of textiles, basketry and cordage. At Dzudzuana Cave, Georgia, the remains of linen fibres were recovered in levels dated to between 32 000 and 13 000 BP (Kvavadze et al. Reference Kvavadze2009; for doubts concerning the identification of linen, see Bergfjord et al. Reference Bergfjord2010). Meanwhile, at Olhao II (19 000 BP, Israel), small fragments of woven fibres (2–3mm in length) have been interpreted as the remains of cordage (Nadel et al. Reference Nadel1994).

The evidence increases considerably during the Holocene. In the Mesolithic Europe, wet or arid conditions have facilitated the preservation of string and rope used to make fishing nets and traps, as well as bows, arrows and other objects at Tybrind Vig (7400–6000 BP, Denmark), Friesack (9700 BP, Germany) Dabki 9 (7000 BP, Poland), Zamostje 2 (8200 BP, Russia) and Santa Maira Caves (13 200–10 200 BP, Spain) (Fischer Reference Fischer1985; Gramsch Reference Gramsch and Coles1992; Myking et al. Reference Myking, Hertzerb and Skrøppa2005; Kabaciński & Terberger Reference Kabacin´ski, Terberger, Kabaciński, Hartz, Raemaekers and Terberger2015; Lozovski & Lozovskaya Reference Lozovski and Lozovskaya2016; Aura et al. Reference Aura2019).

Serving one the earliest Neolithic communities in the Near East, the mortuary cave of Nahal Hemar, Israel, dated to 9900 BP, has yielded fragments of rope and basketry made from rushes (Phragmites australis), reeds (Juncus sp.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum; Schick Reference Schick1986). Also from mortuary contexts are textiles and basketry from Çatalhöyük, Turkey, dated to 7500–7000 BP (Burnham Reference Burnham1965; Marciniak et al. Reference Marciniak2015; Rast-Eicher et al. Reference Rast-Eicher, Karg and Jørgensen2021) and several textile fragments of hemp (Cannabis sativa) or flax dated to 9600–9300 BP from Tell Halula, Syria (Alfaro Reference Alfaro2012).

Numerous European Neolithic lake sites have also preserved objects made from perishable materials. Examples include Charavines, on Lake Paladru, France, with ropes, textiles and baskets dating to 6000 BP (Bocquet & Berretror Reference Bocquet and Berretrot1988) and the use of lime (Tilia sp.) bast and flax at Arbon-Bleiche 3, Lake Constance, Switzerland, dated to 5400–5300 BP (Médard Reference Médard2003). Also in Switzerland, excavation of the Egolzwil settlement, located on the former Lake Wauwilermoos, yielded textiles, cordage and basketry made of flax, and oak and lime bast (Vogt Reference Vogt1951). Artefacts of lime and Clematis sp. bast have also been recovered from La Draga (7300–7000 BP), on the shores of Lake Banyoles, Spain (Piqué et al. Reference Piqué2018; Romero et al. Reference Romero, Piqué and Herrero2021).

As well as waterlogged contexts, objects made of organic materials have also been preserved in extremely arid contexts. This is the case, for example, with sandals and baskets made from esparto grass (Stipa tenacissima) and dated c. 6800–6000 BP recovered from the Cueva de los Murciélagos in Albuñol, Spain (Cacho et al. Reference Cacho, Papí, Sánchez-Barriga and Alonso1996). Finally, preserved in the frozen conditions of the high Alps, the textiles and other objects associated with the ice mummy known as ‘Ötzi’ (5300 BP) also deserve mention. These include artefacts made of lime bast: a dagger sheath, cords and a knotted net of twined strings, as well as shoe components (Spindler Reference Spindler1995).

The Neolithic settlement of La Marmotta

In the context of the above overview, here we present an introduction to the remains of basketry, textiles and cordage recovered from the submerged site of Early Neolithic of La Marmotta. The assemblage retrieved from this site is so large that a detailed description of each object cannot be provided here. Instead, the aim of this article is to offer an overview, in order to illustrate the diversity and exceptional preservation of the La Marmotta material, which emphasise the fundamental importance of the site for the study of plant exploitation and technologies in the European Neolithic.

La Marmotta lies beneath the waters of Lake Bracciano. The first archaeological remains were discovered in 1989 during works to lay pipes on the lakebed. Archaeological excavations were conducted from 1992 to 2009, under the supervision of M.A. Fugazzola, director of the Superintendence of the Museo nazionale preistorico ed etnografico ‘Luigi Pigorini’, which was subsequently merged with the Museo delle Civiltà (Fugazzola et al. Reference Fugazzola, D'Eugenio and Pessina1993) (Figure 1). In 2018, an international team directed by the new Museo delle Civiltà–Museo nazionale preistorico ed etnografico ‘Luigi Pigorini’ and the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) was formed to undertake a study of the archaeological remains from La Marmotta and to bring them to publication. When completed, this work will make known a site and associated material culture of the utmost importance that, to date, have been only cursorily and incompletely published.

Figure 1. Location of La Marmotta (Anguillara Sabazia) (produced by G. Remolins).

The site lies approximately 300m from the modern shoreline, submerged at a depth of 11m, which comprises 8m of water and 3m of sediment (Figure 2). Lake Bracciano is connected to the Tyrrhenian coast by the river Arrone—a route that will have provided access from the sea during the Neolithic period. It is estimated that approximately 25 per cent of the 2ha village site has been excavated, although the full extent of the remains still needs to be confirmed (Fugazzola Reference Fugazzola, Fugazzola, Pesina and Tiné2002: 375).

Figure 2. Top) Lake Bracciano; bottom) excavation of the site of La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Three phases or levels have been defined, dating to between c. 7700 and 7150 BP, encompassing the Italian Early Neolithic (Mazzucco et al. Reference Mazzucco2022). Level II, corresponding to the foundation of the settlement, is characterised by the presence of Impressed Ware pottery and smaller quantities of incised ware associated with painted ware. Level I represents the latest phase of the settlement and is associated with painted and incised pottery in the Sasso-Fiorano style and very little painted ware. Finally, lying above Levels I and II, a third level (known as Chiocciolaio) reflects the abandonment of the settlement. It has been suggested by the excavators that the geographical location of, and finds from, the settlement at La Marmotta might indicate a place of interaction between different cultural groups (Fugazzola & Mineo Reference Fugazzola and Mineo1995). In a number of ways, however, the site is unique; for example, some ceramics, such as the canoe-shaped vessels, are unknown elsewhere in Italy (Fugazzola Reference Fugazzola2019).

Archaeological investigation of the site has documented several thousand wooden piles or support posts on the lakebed; the spatial distribution of these piles permits the identification of a minimum of 13 house structures arranged parallel to one another on the Neolithic lake shore. These dwellings—8 to 10m long and approximately 6m wide—were rectangular, with internal partition walls and a central hearth. Five wooden canoes, some found next to the houses, are currently the only known examples from the Neolithic Mediterranean (Fugazzola & Mineo Reference Fugazzola and Mineo1995; Fugazzola Reference Fugazzola, Fugazzola, Pesina and Tiné2002).

The abandonment of the settlement may have been connected to a sudden rise in the water level of the lake. Whatever the reason, the inhabitants left behind all their possessions, including tools, food-preparation vessels and the canoes. Numerous building elements and wooden objects were also found to have been burnt, similar to what has been observed in other submerged villages, such as in some Alpine lake sites (Neolithic, Switzerland) and Must Farm (Bronze Age, UK) (Bleicher & Harb Reference Bleicher and Harb2018; Knight et al. Reference Knight2019). Future geomorphological studies may help to determine precisely what happened at the end of the site's occupation.

The archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological finds indicate a community practising a well-developed farming economy. Among the domestic livestock, which comprise approximately 75 per cent of the minimum number of individuals (MNI) documented, goats and sheep are the best represented species, followed by cattle, pigs and dogs. Several wild mammal species including red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), aurochs (Bos primigenius) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes), as well as birds, reptiles and fish have also been recorded (Tagliacozzo Reference Tagliacozzo2005).

Within the archaeobotanical assemblage, 65 per cent of the material comprises cereals, especially emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum L.) and other varieties of wheat and barley (T. monococcum S., Hordeum distichum, H. vulgare L. and T. aestivum compactum and durum). Other plant resources include legumes (Pisum sativum, Lens culinaris, Lathyrus cicera/sativus and Vicia cfr. sativa), several types of fruit (e.g. Prunus spinosa, Ficus carica, Sambucus sp., Fragaria vesca, Rubus fruticosus, Corylus avellana, Quercus sp.), flax (Linum usatissimum) and poppy (Papaver somniferum), as well as wild plants, such as Carthamus lanatus and Silybum marianum (Rottoli Reference Rottoli1993, Reference Rottoli2002). The inhabitants of the site also gathered fungi, which may have been used to light fires (e.g. Fomes fomentarius) or for their medicinal properties (e.g. Daedalopsis tricolor; Bernicchia et al. Reference Bernicchia2006).

The site's excellent preservation conditions have conserved numerous wooden objects, such as bows, mattocks, sickles, spoons and containers. These organic finds are complemented by thousands of lithic tools made from flint and obsidian, numerous stone axes, adzes and querns, and an array of bone tools (Fugazzola et al. Reference Fugazzola, D'Eugenio and Pessina1993).

The provenances of some of the raw materials recovered from the site demonstrate that the La Marmotta community participated in extensive and complex exchange networks with populations hundreds of kilometres away. Examples include flint from the Gargano promontory (Mazzucco et al. Reference Mazzucco2022) in the Foggia region of south-eastern Italy, obsidian from the Palmarola and Lipari Islands, and Alpine stone used to make axes and adzes (D'Amico Reference D'Amico, Pessina and Muscio2000).

In the following sections, we focus on the evidence from La Marmotta for textiles, basketry and cordage, and the tools used for their production. We start with an overview of the carpological evidence, which informs discussion of fibres and textile manufacture, before turning to the remains of baskets, cordage and textiles, and the tools possibly used to make them. Our aim is not to provide a detailed description of each object but, rather, to furnish an idea of the range and importance of the craftwork activities they represent.

Carpological evidence

Focusing on material potentially related to textile production, to date, out of more than 20 000 archaeobotanical determinations, only five flax seeds have been identified (by M. Rottoli) at La Marmotta. Flax, however, may be underrepresented in archaeological assemblages from the site for a number of reasons. For example, although many of the samples were sieved as soon as sediments were brought to the surface, the mesh size of several millimetres which permitted the recovery of the cereals and fruit stones probably missed smaller seeds, such as flax. Even in sealed contexts, such as the contents of vessels, however, evidence for flax is absent, with the exception of a single poorly preserved seed. Here, it is worth noting that the high oil content of flax seeds often causes their fragmentation in waterlogged conditions (Märkle & Rösch Reference Märkle and Rösch2008).

Among the other plant species that we have documented at La Marmotta, several may have been used for dyeing (e.g. Hypericum perforatum, Phragmites australis, Persicaria maculosa, Prunus spinosa, Sambucus spp.), but until now, no particular archaeological contexts with accumulations of seeds or other parts of these plants have been found that can demonstrate this use. In contrast, the charred and waterlogged seeds of Carthamus lanatus are widely distributed at the site (Rottoli Reference Rottoli1993, Reference Rottoli2002). This species, undocumented at other Italian Neolithic sites, is similar to Carthamus tinctorius (safflower), which can be used for dyeing and for the extraction of an edible oil. Safflower, however, did not spread to Europe until the start of the Bronze Age (Marinova & Riehl Reference Marinova and Riehl2009) and C. lanatus perhaps served a similar purpose in the Neolithic. Notably, the seeds of C. lanatus are larger than those of flax and may therefore be better represented in the La Marmotta samples.

Textiles

Among the most outstanding finds from La Marmotta are four small textile fragments (Figure 3) found in 1995, when Canoe 1 was recovered (Fugazzola & Mineo Reference Fugazzola and Mineo1995; Mineo Reference Mineo, Massussi, Tucci and Laurito2019). Their maximum dimensions are 11mm (SR011), 27mm (SR012; with probable hole), 11.5mm (#3) and 13mm (#4). These fragments are currently under analysis by a team at the University of Copenhagen (Eva B. Andersson and Christina Margariti). It is probable, however, that they are made of plant fibres. This is suggested by the analysis of a short fragment of 6mm-diameter cord found in Square A41. Examination by using a binocular microscope indicates that this cord is made with flax (Linum sp.) fibres (Maria Rita Giuliani and Giulia Gaietta of the Biological Research Laboratory at the IsCR, pers. comm.).

Figure 3. Textile fragments found at La Marmotta (photographs by J.F. Gibaja).

Cordage

In total, 28 fragments of cord and two lengths of thread have been identified at La Marmotta (Figure 4; Table S1 in the online supplementary material (OSM)). Cords such as these could be made using one of three methods—twisting, braiding or knotting short fibres—and used for a wide variety of purposes. The preserved examples vary considerably in size, from small, short fragments to cords several centimetres in length; in some cases, they are rolled or wound in balls and cannot therefore be measured. They also vary in their diameters, from extremely fine threads to durable ropes capable of resisting heavy weights and tensions. Taxonomic identification of the plant fibres used to produce these cords and threads may shed further light on their usage.

Figure 4. Rope from La Marmotta, made by twisting (photographs by Juan F. Gibaja).

Basketry

Basket-making was another common activity of Neolithic farming societies (Gleba & Mannering Reference Gleba and Mannering2012). Basketry could be used for many tasks, including the gathering and processing of food, and the storage and transport of goods. Among the 43 fragments of basketry recovered from La Marmotta, the most frequently attested production technique is the coiling of bundles of fibres around a rigid material, sewn together with stitches, probably using a bone needle (Table S2; Mineo Reference Mineo, Massussi, Tucci and Laurito2019). In some cases, as seen in Figure 5, food remains are preserved in the bottoms of baskets; the imprint of basket walls has also been identified impressed on pieces of bread. As in the case of cordage, taxonomical analysis of the fibres used is ongoing.

Figure 5. Basket from La Marmotta, with remains of food preserved in the bottom (photographs by Juan F. Gibaja).

Spindles, spindle whorls and loom weights

Spindles were used to spin thread by hand. These are typically made of shafts of wood, pointed at either end and with thickening of the mid shaft. The eight spindles found at La Marmotta are exceptional finds in a European prehistoric context. Of great significance is a complete spindle, consisting of a cylindrical wooden shaft with thread still wound around it in a bi-conical shape (Figure 6, no. 1). A second, broken, spindle is notable, as the shaft is slightly curved; thread is wound around this spindle in a conical shape (Figure 6, no. 2).

Figure 6. Spindles from La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Other objects commonly associated with textile production are spindle whorls and loom weights (Rast-Eicher Reference Rast-Eicher and Bichler2005; Mazare Reference Mazare2012; Forte & Lemorini Reference Forte, Lemorini, Gleba and Laurito2017; Grömer Reference Grömer, Siennicka, Rahmstorf and Ulanowska2018; Grabundžija et al. Reference Grabundžija2021). Some 78 loom weights and three spindle whorls have been recovered from La Marmotta (Figure 7). The loom weights vary widely in shape and size: cylindrical, triangular, trapezoidal, rhomboidal, circular and spherical. The spindle whorls are lenticular or bi-conical discs, with a central hole. These objects are made from refined clay to which various mineral inclusions were occasionally added (see Table S3).

Figure 7. Spindle whorls and loom weights from La Marmotta, possibly used in weaving or fishing rod (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo and J.F. Gibaja).

Weaving tools

Finally, we report a group of wooden tools probably used in textile production, or for processing plant materials. Earlier site reports have labelled these finds as ‘spadoni’, weaving swords, and ‘draghetti’. Spadoni, of which 34 complete or fragmented examples are documented from the site, take the form of a long, narrow spatula, with a sharp side and lenticular cross-section (Figure 8). At least one of the two ends is always narrower, forming a handle, and the surviving surfaces are smoothed, probably by prolonged hand contact. In some cases, the handle terminates with a pommel to enable the tool to be held more securely. Spadoni can be differentiated from weaving swords based on size, as morphologically they are very similar (Mineo Reference Mineo, Massussi, Tucci and Laurito2019). Weaving swords (four cases) are no longer than 600mm in length, 35mm wide and 15mm thick, while the spadoni are sometimes considerably larger—up to 1.34m in length, 73mm wide and 14mm thick. Because of their large size, some of the spadoni appear to have handles at both ends, and they may have been intended for use by two persons. Weaving swords are also known at other Neolithic sites in Switzerland (Niederwil-Egelsee and Robenhausen-Wetzikon) and Italy (Fiave) (Bazzanella et al. Reference Bazzanella, Mayr, Moser and Rast-Eicher2003). They were probably used during weaving to ensure that each new weft thread was tightly packed down.

Figure 8. Wooden implements known as ‘weaving swords’ (1) or spadoni in Italian (2), from La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Draghetti—the name derived from the resemblance of their toothed form to a dragon's back—are represented by seven complete or fragmented examples. These tools are characterised by a straight proximal part, invariably pierced by a small hole for a cord that could have been used to suspend and/or secure it around the wrist, and a curved part. The latter consists of an internal concave surface worn smooth by use, and an external convex face with a series of aligned triangular teeth, some with longitudinal striations and distinct rounding—probably the result of repeated abrasion during use. Although the complete specimens range between 230 and 255mm in length, one of the broken examples (#12240, Level I, Square D241) must have been much longer, as it is 245mm long, despite missing much of the distal end. The proximal areas are between 48 and 65mm wide, while the convex distal part varies from 55 or 65mm in its widest section to 20 or 30mm at the pointed end. The proximal part is 11–16mm thick and the distal part 22–28mm thick (Figure 9). Relatively similar objects have been found at the Neolithic lake site of La Draga, Spain (Bosch et al. Reference Bosch2006). Ethnographically attested tools of similar form to the spadoni and draghetti (the latter with metal tips) were used in traditional linen working (Loi Reference Loi2012). They would have been used in a similar way to weaving swords, but designed for working on coarser and larger textiles.

Figure 9. Wooden implement known as a draghetto in Italian, from La Marmotta (photographs by J.F. Gibaja).

The distribution across the site of objects associated with textile production shows a wide spread of activity, with various concentrations in different houses, such as spadoni in house 7 and loom weights in house 12 (Figure 10), which may indicate household specialisation. Perhaps only some of these houses’ inhabitants practised weaving.

Figure 10. Distribution of the artefacts described in the manuscript across the excavated areas of La Marmotta (produced by G. Remolins).

Among other finds from La Marmotta, some tools, such as awls, spatulas and needles made from goat and sheep bone, were clearly used to work raw materials. The pointed ends of some of the awls are extremely smooth and shiny, presumably as a result of use-wear, such as repeated contact with plant fibres or animal skins (Mozota & Gibaja Reference Mozota and Gibaja2015). Flaked stone tools were also used to process plant fibres at La Marmotta, as is well known from other Epipalaeolithic and Early Neolithic sites in the Mediterranean. Plant-working activities have been reconstructed based on use-wear trace analysis in several Capsian sites in Algeria and Tunisia (i.e. Saint Trivier, Kef Zoura D, Aïn Metherchem), but also in many settlements of the first agropastoral communities, such as La Draga or Cueva de Chaves in the Iberian Peninsula (Mazzucco et al. Reference Mazzucco2015; Mazzucco & Gibaja Reference Mazzucco and Gibaja2018). From an assemblage of several thousand lithic finds from La Marmotta, a sample of 831 pieces from Layers I and II includes eight tools (with a total of 12 used edges). These are all bladelets that were used on their unretouched edges to scrape plant materials, exhibiting a smooth polish with clear transversal directionality. The striaes and directionality of the micropolish, especially on the upper face of the tools, show that they were used for scraping. Experiments have demonstrated that this type of tools was used to prepare plant fibres for cord making and basketry (Caspar et al. Reference Caspar2005; Little & van Gijn Reference Little and van Gijn2017). The analysis of a larger sample of the lithic material from La Marmotta will allow us to assess more fully the importance of plant fibre processing activities at the site. Data from other Neolithic sites in the Western Mediterranean suggest that up to 20 to 30 per cent of the tools used were for wood- and plant-working activities; for example, at La Draga, 51 used edges from 467 tools show evidence of wood and plant processing (Mazzucco & Gibaja Reference Mazzucco and Gibaja2018; Gassin et al. Reference Gassin2020).

Conclusions

In recent decades, the expansion of the Neolithic way of life has often been discussed in the archaeological literature as a turning point in human history. One of the factors explaining the success of that expansion is the technological sophistication of those earliest farming communities. Our understanding of their technical knowledge and skill is typically limited to objects made of durable stone and ceramic. The limited extent of the picture that we can usually reconstruct is made clear by the settlement of La Marmotta. Here, the excellent preservation of wooden structures and objects of various perishable materials creates a much fuller understanding of the technical complexity of these early farming societies, perhaps even pointing to the existence of craft specialists. In particular, we might note the building of canoes almost 11m in length, the use of a suite of specialised tools for the production of textiles, and sickles of advanced design (Mineo Reference Mineo, Massussi, Tucci and Laurito2019; Mazzucco et al. Reference Mazzucco2020). Finds such as these point to the central importance of these technologies not only at La Marmotta but almost certainly at other less well-preserved sites. Even so, the 28 fragments of cordage from La Marmotta can only represent a small fraction of the material culture, including clothes, tools and containers that were made and used by the site's inhabitants, and we still lack completely many other objects whose presence is only implied, such as looms. Nonetheless, the evidence from submerged sites in various parts of Europe clearly indicates that Early Neolithic societies were highly knowledgeable about the varied plants resources to which they had access and the methods required to process them. The full publication of La Marmotta in due course will establish the site as one of the highest importance for the study of European prehistory.

Supplementary materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2023.21.

Acknowledgements

This article is dedicated to the memory of Filippo Maria Gambari (Director of the Museo delle Civiltà di Roma). The research was made possible by the collaboration of the ‘La Marmotta’ research team, the management, curators, researchers and other staff at the Museo delle Civiltà and the CSIC (Institución Milá y Fontanals and Española de Historia y Arqueología in Rome). The photographs of La Marmotta and the archaeological artefacts were kindly provided by the Museo delle Civiltà. This article would not have been possible without the research of all the archaeologists who have worked at La Marmotta over the years. Finally, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their comments. They have undoubtedly improved the text.

Funding statement

Several projects funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain, Agencia Estatal de Investigación of Spain, CSIC, Marie Curie Europe Program and Ministry for University and Research of Italy have resulted from this collaboration: PID2020-112513RB-I00, HAR2016-75201-P, PIAR-201818008, PIAR-201918010, QUANT-792544 and Rita Levi Montalcini project AGER.

References

Alfaro, C. 2012. Textiles from the Pre-pottery Neolithic site of Tell Halula (Euphrates Valley, Syria). Paléorient 38: 4154. https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.2012.5457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aura, J.E. et al. 2019. Cordage, basketry and containers at the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary in south-west Europe: evidence from Coves de Santa Maira (Valencian region, Spain). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 29: 581–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-019-00758-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, M., Mayr, A., Moser, L. & Rast-Eicher, A.. 2003. Textiles: intrecci e tessuti dalla preistoria europea. Tento: Servizio Beni Culturali, Provincia Autonoma di Trento.Google Scholar
Bergfjord, C. et al. 2010. Comment on “30,000-year-old wild flax fibers”. Science 328: 1634. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernicchia, A. et al. 2006. DNA recovered and sequenced from an almost 7000 y-old Neolithic polypore, Daedaleopsis tricolor. Mycological Research 110: 1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2005.09.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleicher, N. & Harb, C.. 2018. Settlement and social organisation in the late fourth millennium BC in Central Europe: the waterlogged site of Zurich-Parkhaus Opéra. Antiquity 92: 1210–30. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocquet, A. & Berretrot, F.. 1988. Le travail des fibres textiles au Néolithique récent à Charavines (Isère), in Tissage, corderie, vannerie: approches archéologiques, ethnologiques, technologiques. Actes IXe rencontres internationales d'archéologie et d'histoire : 113–28. Juan-les-Pins: Association pour la promotion et la diffusion des connaissances archéologiques.Google Scholar
Bocquet, A. & Noël, M.. 1985. The Neolithic or Wood Age. Endeavour 9: 3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-9327(85)90007-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, A. et al. (ed.). 2006. Els objectes de fusta del poblat neolític de la Draga. Excavacions de 1995–2005 (Monografies del CASC 6): 27126. Girona: Museu d'arqueologia de Catalunya/Centre d'arqueologia subaquàtica de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Burnham, H. 1965. Çatalhöyük, the textiles and twined fabrics. Anatolian Studies 15: 169–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3642509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacho, C., Papí, C., Sánchez-Barriga, A. & Alonso, F.. 1996. La cestería decorada de la Cueva de Los Murciélagos (Albuñol, Granada). Complutum 6: 105–22.Google Scholar
Caspar, J.-P. et al. 2005. Identification et reconstitution des traces de teillage des fibres végétales au Néolithique. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 102: 867–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amico, C. 2000. La pietra levigata neolítica in Italia settentrionale e in Europa: litologia, produziones e circozalione, in Pessina, A. & Muscio, G. (ed.) La neolitizzazione tra Oriente e Occidente: 6780. Undine: Museo friulano di storia naturale.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. 1985. På jagt med stenalder-våben. Foesog med fortiden 3. Leijre: Historisk-Arkeologisk Forsogcenter.Google Scholar
Forte, V. & Lemorini, C.. 2017. Traceological analysis applied to textile implements: an assessment of the method through the case study of the 1st millennium BCE ceramic tools in central Italy, in Gleba, M. & Laurito, R. (ed.) Contextualising textile production in Italy in the 1st millennium BC (Origini: Preistoria e protostoria delle civiltà 40): 165–82. Rome: Gangemi.Google Scholar
Fugazzola, M.A. 2019. Modellini di natanti neolitici: possibili lucerne? Navis: Rassegna di studi di archeologia, etnologia e storia navale 6: 1723.Google Scholar
Fugazzola, M.A. 2002. La Marmotta, Lazio, in Fugazzola, M.A., Pesina, A. & Tiné, V. (ed.) Le ceramiche impresse nel Neolitico antico. Italia e Mediterraneo (Studi di Paletnologia 1): 373–95. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.Google Scholar
Fugazzola, M.A. & Mineo, M.. 1995. La piroga neolitica del lago di Bracciano (“La Marmotta 1”). Bulletino di Paletnologia Italiana 86: 197266.Google Scholar
Fugazzola, M.A., D'Eugenio, G. & Pessina, A.. 1993. La Marmotta (Anguillara Sabazia, RM). Scavi 1989: un abitato perilacustre di età neolitica. Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 84: 5115.Google Scholar
Gassin, B. et al. 2020. Lithic industries and plant processing in the Epipalaeolithic Maghreb: evidence from use-wear analyses. Quaternary International 555: 4765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleba, M. & Mannering, U.. 2012. Textiles and textile production in Europe from prehistory to AD 400 (Ancient Textiles Series, vol. 1). Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1djwg.6Google Scholar
Grabundžija, A. et al. 2021. The interaction of distant technologies: bridging Central Europe using a techno-typological comparison of spindle whorls. Antiquity 95: 627–47. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsch, B. 1992. Friesack Mesolithic wetlands, in Coles, B. (ed.) The wetland revolution in prehistory: 6572. Exeter: WARP and The Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2018. Late Neolithic weaving tools from Melk-Spielberg in Austria: experiments with crescent-shaped weights, in Siennicka, M., Rahmstorf, L. & Ulanowska, A. (ed.) First textiles: the beginnings of textile manufacture in Europe and the Mediterranean: 117–28. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13nb7sb.15Google Scholar
Kabacin´ski, J. & Terberger, T.. 2015. Features and finds of the Stone Age sites Dąbki 9 and 10, in Kabaciński, J., Hartz, S., Raemaekers, D.C.M. & Terberger, T. (ed.) The Dąbki site in Pomerania and the Neolithisation of the north European lowlands (c. 5000–3000 cal BC) (Archaeology and History of the Baltic 8): 1370–55. Radhen/Westfalen: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Knight, M. et al. 2019. The Must Farm pile-dwelling settlement. Antiquity 93: 645–63. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvavadze, E. et al. 2009. 30,000-year-old wild flax fibers. Science 325: 1359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11754 04CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A. & van Gijn, A.L.. 2017. Enigmatic plant-working tools and the transition to farming in the Rhine Meuse Delta. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 47: 111.Google Scholar
Loi, C. 2012. Le corde di lino per archi fra etnografia e sperimentazione archeologica. Tiro con l‘arco tradizionale 1: 8285.Google Scholar
Lozovski, V.M. & Lozovskaya, O.V.. 2016. New evidence of the fishing economy of Stone Age waterlogged sites in central and north-western Russia: the example of Zamostje 2. Iskos 21: 85100Google Scholar
Marciniak, A. et al. 2015. Fragmenting times: interpreting a Bayesian chronology for the Late Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Antiquity 89: 154–76. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2014.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Märkle, T. & Rösch, M.. 2008. Experiments on the effects of carbonization on some cultivated plant seeds. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 1: 257–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-008-0165-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinova, E. & Riehl, S.. 2009. Carthamus species in the ancient Near East and south-eastern Europe: archaeobotanical evidence for their distribution and use as a source of oil. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 18: 341–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-009-0212-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazare, N.P. 2012. The craft of textile production at the Neolithic and Eneolithic communities in Transylvania. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Alba Iulia.Google Scholar
Mazzucco, N. & Gibaja, J.F.. 2018. A palaeoeconomic perspective on the Early Neolithic lithic assemblages of the N–NE of the Iberian Peninsula. Quaternary International 472: 236–45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucco, N. et al. 2015. Insights into the economic organization of the first agro-pastoral communities of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula: a traceological analysis of the Cueva de Chaves flaked stone assemblage. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2: 353–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.02.010Google Scholar
Mazzucco, N. et al. 2020. Migration, adaptation, innovation: the spread of Neolithic harvesting technologies in the Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 15: e0232455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232455Google ScholarPubMed
Mazzucco, N. et al. 2022. Multiproxy study of 7500-year-old wooden sickles from the Lakeshore Village of La Marmotta, Italy. Scientific Reports 12: 14976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18597-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Médard, F. 2003. Vestiges textiles et activités de filage sur le site néolithique d'Arbon-Bleiche 3 (TG Suisse). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 100: 375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mineo, M. 2019. Tessiture e intrecci, in Massussi, M., Tucci, S. & Laurito, R. (ed.) Trame di storia. Metodi e strumenti dell'archeologia sperimentale. Archeofest 2017: 119–46. Rome: E.S.S. Editorial Service System.Google Scholar
Mozota, M. & Gibaja, J.F.. 2015. “For a few awls more”. Bone tools in northeastern Iberia Neolithic burials (4th–5th millennia cal BC): a morpho-technical and functional approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4: 6577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.08.023Google Scholar
Myking, T., Hertzerb, A. & Skrøppa, T.. 2005. History, manufacture and properties of lime bast cordage in Northern Europe. Forestry 78: 6571. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, D. et al. 1994. 19,000-year-old twisted fibers from Ohalo II. Current Anthropology 35: 451–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/204303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piqué, R. et al. 2018. The production and use of cordage at the Early Neolithic site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain). Quaternary International 468: 262–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.05.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2005. Bast before wool: the first textiles, in Bichler, P. et al. (ed.) Hallstatt textiles: technical analysis, scientific investigation and experiment on Iron Age textiles (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1351): 117–31. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A., Karg, S. & Jørgensen, L. Bender. 2021. The use of local fibres for textiles at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Antiquity 95: 1129–44. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, S., Piqué, R. & Herrero, M.. 2021. The basketry at the Early Neolithic site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 35: 102692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102692.Google Scholar
Rottoli, M. 1993. La Marmotta, Anguillara Sabazia (RM). Scavi 1989: Analisi paletnobotaniche: prime risultanze. Bulletino di Paletnologia Italiana 84: 305–15.Google Scholar
Rottoli, M. 2002. Zafferanone selvatico (Carthamus lanatus) e cardo della Madonna (Silybum marianum), piante raccolte o coltivate nel Neolitico antico a “La Marmotta”? Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 91/92: 4761.Google Scholar
Schick, T. 1986. Perishable remains from the Nahal Hemar Cave. Israel Prehistoric Society 1986: 9597.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. 1995. The man in the ice: the discovery of a 5000-year-old body reveals the secrets of the Stone Age. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Tagliacozzo, A. 2005. Animal exploitation in the Early Neolithic in central-southern Italy. Munibe 57: 429–39.Google Scholar
Vogt, E. 1951. Das steinzeitliche Uferdorf von Egolzwil 3 (Kt. Luzern). Bericht über die Ausgrabung 1950. Zeitschrift für Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte 12: 193215.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of La Marmotta (Anguillara Sabazia) (produced by G. Remolins).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Top) Lake Bracciano; bottom) excavation of the site of La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Textile fragments found at La Marmotta (photographs by J.F. Gibaja).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Rope from La Marmotta, made by twisting (photographs by Juan F. Gibaja).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Basket from La Marmotta, with remains of food preserved in the bottom (photographs by Juan F. Gibaja).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Spindles from La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Spindle whorls and loom weights from La Marmotta, possibly used in weaving or fishing rod (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo and J.F. Gibaja).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Wooden implements known as ‘weaving swords’ (1) or spadoni in Italian (2), from La Marmotta (photographs by Museo delle Civiltà-Mario Mineo).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Wooden implement known as a draghetto in Italian, from La Marmotta (photographs by J.F. Gibaja).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Distribution of the artefacts described in the manuscript across the excavated areas of La Marmotta (produced by G. Remolins).

Supplementary material: PDF

Mineo et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Mineo et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 224.6 KB