Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:32:06.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the uniqueness of solitary Rossby waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

P. E. Kloeden
P. E. Kloeden
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and physical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, W. A. 6150; and Centre for Enviornmental Fluid Dynamics, University of W. A., Nedlands, W. A. 6009, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The explicit solitary Rossby wave solutions found by Larichev, Reznik and Berestov are shown to be unique for the model equations considered, in the sense that there are no other antisymmetric wave solutions which are not of these forms. This is done by adapting arguments used by Amick and Fraenkel to show the uniqueness of the Hill's vortex solution. It is based on the maximum principle and the domain folding method of Gidas, Ni and Nirenberg, and involves showing that the function ψ/y is radially symmetric, where ψ is the streamfunction of a solitary wave and y the horizontal cartesian coordinate perpendicular to the x-axis, along which the waves move at steady positive speed. This argument is also used to show the uniqueness of the well-known explicit solutions for cylindrical vortices. The result does not apply directly to rider solutions of Flierl et al., which are not antisymmetric, but it does restrict the possible rider solutions that can form because of their association with particular antisymmetric solutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , April 1987 , pp. 476 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1987

References

[1]Amick, L. J. and Fraenkel, L. E., “The uniqueness of Hill's spherical vortex”, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 92 (1986), 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berestov, A. L., “Solitary Rossby waves” Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR Atmospher. Ocean. Phys. 15 (1979), 443–447.Google Scholar
[3]Flierl, G. R. and Larichev, V. D., McWilliams, J. C. and Reznik, G. M., “The dynamics of baroclinic and barotropic solitary eddies”, Dyn. Atmos. Ocean. 5 (1980), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gidas, B., Ni, W.-M. and Nirenberg, L., “Symmetry and related properties via the maximum principle”, Comm. Math. Phys. 68 (1979), 209–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Keady, G. and Norbury, J., “A semilinear elliptic eigenvalue problem I”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 87 (1980), 65–82.Google Scholar
[6]Lamb, H., Hydrodynamics, 6th Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932).Google Scholar
[7]Larichev, V. D. and Reznik, G. M., “On two dimensional solitary Rossby waves” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 231 (1976), 1077–1079(Russian).Google Scholar
[8]Pedlosky, J., Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Protter, M. and Weinberger, H., Maximum Priniciples in Differential Equations (Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs NJ, 1967).Google Scholar