Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:35:15.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cumulative semantic interference in young children's picture naming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

MONIQUE CHAREST
MONIQUE CHAREST*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Monique Charest, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Alberta, 2-70 Corbett Hall, Edmonton ABCanadaT6G 2G4. E-mail: mcharest@ualberta.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In children and adults, naming an item sometimes interferes with later attempts to name other items. Adult speakers experience cumulative semantic interference, interpreted as the result of incremental learning. Studies to date have not examined whether incremental learning can also account for interference in children. This study examined context effects on picture naming in 3-year-old children, and investigated whether children, like adults, show interference that is semantically based and cumulative. Children named pictures from semantically homogeneous and mixed sets. Response latency, accuracy, and repetition errors were recorded. The results demonstrated a progressive slowing of responses in the semantically homogeneous condition that was greater than that observed for the mixed condition. There were no significant effects for accuracy. Repetition errors, although infrequent, patterned similarly to previous reports for adults. The results indicate that preschool-aged children experience cumulative semantic interference in naming, and suggest that incremental learning may account for interference effects across development.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 835 - 853
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 604–614. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604 Google Scholar
Bååth, R. (2010). ChildFreq: An online tool to explore word frequencies in child language (Tech Rep. LUCS Minor 16). Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 Google Scholar
Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 58, 667–692. doi:10.1080/02724980443000142 Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J., & Vitkovitch, M. (2008). Perseverant responding in children's picture naming. Journal of Child Language, 35, 235–246. doi:10.1017/S030500090700832X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S. (1981). Inhibition in cued retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 204–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.204 Google Scholar
Budd, M.-J., Hanley, R., & Griffiths, Y. (2011). Simulating children's retrieval errors in picture-naming: A test of Foygel and Dell's (2000) semantic/phonological model of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.005 Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 125–127. doi:10.3758/BF03203646 Google Scholar
Damian, M., & Als, L. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1372–1384. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372 Google ScholarPubMed
Dell, G., Burger, L., & Svec, W. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.123 Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2002). Object naming, vocabulary growth, and the development of word retrieval abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 665–687. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2830 Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B., & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations in two- and four-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 33, 461–486. doi:10.1017/S0305000906007562 Google Scholar
Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464–482. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006 Google Scholar
Hsiao, E. Y., Schwartz, M. F., Schnur, T. T., & Dell, G. S. (2009). Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming. Brain and Language, 108, 133–144. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.003 Google Scholar
Jerger, S., Martin, R. C., & Damian, M. F. (2002). Semantic and phonological influences on picture naming by children and teenagers. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 229–249. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00002-5 Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. N., Dale, P. S., Bleses, D., & Fenson, L. (2010). CLEX: A cross-linguistic lexical norms database. Journal of Child Language, 37, 419–428. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009544 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic bias in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, C., Weil, C. M., & Sperber, R. D. (1976). The development of memory structure as reflected by semantic-priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 511–518. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(76)90113-2 Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 528–559. doi:10.1080/027249897392017 Google Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2007). Cumulative semantic interference as learning. Brain and Language, 103, 175–176. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poll, G. H., Watkins, H. S., & Miller, C. A. (2014). Lexical decay during online sentence processing in adults with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2253–2260. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0265 Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc. Google Scholar
Schnur, T. T. (2014). The persistence of cumulative semantic interference during naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 27–44. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 199–227. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, H., & Munakata, Y. (2013). So many options, so little control: Abstract representations can reduce selection demands to increase children's self-directed flexibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 659–673. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.010 Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 164–188. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(89)90042-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitkovitch, M., Kirby, A., & Tyrrell, L. (1996). Patterns of excitation and inhibition in picture naming. Visual Cognition, 3, 61–80. doi:10.1080/713756730 Google Scholar
Vitkovitch, M., Rutter, C., & Read, A. (2001). Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: The effect of the interval between prime and target on picture naming responses. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 483–606. doi:10.1348/000712601162301 Google Scholar
Vousden, J. I., & Maylor, E. A. (2006). Speech errors across the lifespan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 48–77. doi:10.1080/01690960400001838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar