Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition

  • CATHERINE E. SHOWALTER (a1) and RACHEL HAYES-HARB (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Recent research has indicated that learners exposed to second language words’ orthographic forms of words can often use this information to make inferences about the words’ phonological forms. Here we asked, do learners benefit even when the orthography is unfamiliar? We taught native English speakers minimal nonword pairs differentiated by the Arabic velar–uvular contrast (e.g., [kubu], [qubu]) and manipulated the quality of orthographic input. We found that participants were consistently unable to associate the novel phonemes with novel words. Results are discussed in terms of (a) the role of orthographic input in second language word form learning, (b) the influence of orthographic familiarity in moderating the role of orthographic input, and (c) the issue of talker variability in word learning.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Rachel Hayes-Harb, Department of Linguistics, University of Utah, 255 South Central Campus Drive, Room 2300, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. E-mail: r.hayes-harb@utah.edu
References
Hide All
Bassetti B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy, 9, 95114.
Bassetti B. (2008). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Piske T. & Young-Scholten M. (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 191206). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bassetti B., & Atkinson N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 67–91.
Brodeur M. B., Dionne-Dostie E., Montreuil T., & Lepage M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLOS ONE, 5, e10773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
Brustad K., Al-Batal M., & Al-Tonsi A. (1995). Alif baa: Introduction to Arabic letters and sounds. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Creative Commons. (n.d.). Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Cutler A., Treiman R., & van Ooijen B. (2010). Strategic deployment of orthographic knowledge in phoneme detection. Language and Speech, 53, 307320.
Cutler A., Weber A., & Otake T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269284.
Darcy I., Dekydtspotter L., Sprouse R. A., Glover J., Kaden C., McGuire M., et al. (2012). Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English–L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research, 28, 540.
Detey S., & Nespoulous J. (2008). Can orthography influence second language syllabic segmentation? Japanese epenthetic vowels and French consonantal clusters. Lingua, 118, 6681. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2007.04.003
Escudero P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 7–22.
Escudero P., Hayes-Harb R., & Mitterer H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345360.
Escudero P., Simon E., & Mulak K. E. (2014). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn't always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 384395.
Escudero P., & Wanrooij K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53, 343365.
Forster K. I., & Forster J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116124.
Hayes-Harb R., & Masuda K. (2008). Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research, 24, 533.
Hayes-Harb R., Nicol J., & Barker J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53, 367381.
Ota M., Hartsuiker R. J., & Haywood S. L. (2009). The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111, 263269.
Perrachione T. K., Lee J., Ha L. Y. Y., & Wong P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461472.
Pytlyk C. (2011). Shared orthography: Do shared written symbols influence the perception of L2 sounds? Modern Language Journal, 95, 541.
Rafat Y. (2015). The interaction of acoustic and orthographic input in the second language production of Spanish assibilated/fricative rhotics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 4366.
Schulz E., Krahl G., & Reuschel W. (2000). Standard Arabic: An elementary-intermediate course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shehata A. K. (2013). When variability matters in second language word learning: Talker variability and task type effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
Showalter C. E., & Hayes-Harb R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29, 185200.
Simon E., Chambless D., & Alves U. K. (2010). Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32, 380394.
Weber A., & Cutler A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 125.
Wong P. C. M., & Perrachione T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565585.
Young-Scholten M., & Langer M. (2015). The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 93114.
Ziegler J. C., Muneaux M., & Grainger J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 779793.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 113 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 380 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.