Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:55:03.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To renegotiate heritage and citizenship beyond essentialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Abstract

The heritage sector all through Europe and beyond is historically linked to the task of providing nations with glorious myths of origin within a metaphysical framework of essentialism. This is now shifting. With ambitions to pluralize the past, archaeology and the heritage sector are transforming within the nation state. Heritage in present-day societies has increasingly come to serve citizens with a range of cultural identities to chose from. But what is actually new in the way archaeology and the heritage sector address issues of heritage and citizenship? This text discusses how the heritage sector tends to renegotiate the essentialism of the nation state in theory, but at the same time maintain essentialism as the driving force in professional practices and interpretative frameworks. I suggest a new way for archaeology to work within another framework than essentialism. This suggestion does not go beyond the nation state, but inspires archaeology to rethink its narratives on how heritage links to citizenship.

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, G.J., Graham, B. and Tunbridge, J.E. 2007: Pluralising pasts. Heritage, identity and place in multicultural societies, London.Google Scholar
Beck, U., 2006: The cosmopolitan vision, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M., 2007: A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology. Nationalism, colonialism, and the past, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, O.E., Fossum, E.J. and Menéndez, J.A. (eds), 2003: En författning för Europa, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Eriksen, T.H., 2004: Rötter och fötter. Identitet i en ombytlig tid, Nora.Google Scholar
Eriksen, T.H., 2010: Samfunn, Oslo.Google Scholar
Fleck, L., 1935: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Basel.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1994: Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state, in Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism, Princeton, NJ, 107–48.Google Scholar
Harding, T., 2008: En mångkulturell kulturpolitik?, in Beckman, S. and Månsson, S. (eds), Kultur Sverige 2009. Problemanalys och statistik, Linköping, 3136.Google Scholar
Harrison, R., 2013: Heritage. Critical approaches, New York.Google Scholar
Hegardt, J. (ed.), 2012: The museum beyond the nation, Stockholm (the National Historical Museum, Stockholm, Studies 21).Google Scholar
Högberg, A., 2012: Gamla Uppsala. Staging heritage in a culture of consumption. Heritage & society 5 (2), 175–98.Google Scholar
Högberg, A., 2013: Mångfaldsfrågor i kulturmiljövården. Tankar, kunskaper och processer 2002–2012, Lund.Google Scholar
Högberg, A., 2015: The heritage sector in a multicultural society. A discussion from a Swedish perspective, in Biehl, P.F., Comer, D.C. and Prescott, C. (eds), Identity and heritage. Contemporary challenges in a globalized world, New York, 4753.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., and Högberg, A., 2015: Contemporary heritage and the future, in Waterton, E. and Watson, S. (eds), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research, New York, 509–23.Google Scholar
Jensen, B.E., 2008: Kulturarv. Et identitetspolitisk konfliktfelt, Gylling.Google Scholar
Kamali, M. (ed.), 2006: Den segregerande integrationen. Om social sammanhållning och dess hinder, Stockholm (Rapport av Utredningen om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering, SOU 2006, 73).Google Scholar
Kamali, M., 2008: Racial discrimination. Institutional patterns and politics, London.Google Scholar
Kamali, M., 2011: Integration och makt, in Boozon, S., Eriksson, L., Lundin, A. and Svensson, A. (eds), Att bilda ett samhälle. Texter kring mångkultur och folkbildning (Föreningen för folkbildningsforskning), 93105.Google Scholar
Kuper, A., 2003: The return of the native. Current anthropology 44 (3), 389402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S., 2013: Memorylands. Heritage and identity in Europe today, New York.Google Scholar
Mansbach, R.W., 2010: Nationalism and ethnicity in world politics, in Beeson, M. and Bisley, N. (eds), Issues in 21st century world politics, New York, 108–22.Google Scholar
Mattsson, K., 2005: Diskrimineringens andra ansikte. Svenskheten och ‘det vita västerländska’, in Reyes, P. and Kamali, M. (eds), Bortom Vi och Dom. Teoretiska reflektioner om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering, Stockholm (Rapport av Utredningen om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering, SOU 2005, 42), 139–58.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2015: Book review. A deeper look at the ‘how’ of heritage. Mångfaldsfrågor i kulturmiljövården. Tankar, kunskaper och processer 2002–2012, Public archaeology 13 (4), 348–50.Google Scholar
Peckham, R.S. (ed.), 2003: Rethinking heritage. Cultures and politics in Europe, London.Google Scholar
Peralta, A., 2005: Det sagda och det tänkta. Begreppsanvändning och begreppsskifte i diskursen om invandrare och invandrarpolitik, in de Los Reyes, P. and Kamali, M. (eds), Bortom vi och Dom. Teoretiska reflektioner om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering, Stockholm (Rapport av Utredningen om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering, SOU 2005, 41), 185202.Google Scholar
Pettersson, R., 2003: Den svenska kulturmiljövårdens värdegrunder. En idéhistorisk bakgrund och analys, Umeå (Skrifter från forskningsprogrammet Landskapet som arena 7).Google Scholar
Saukkonen, P., 2013: Multiculturalism and cultural policy in northern Europe. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift 16 (2), 178200.Google Scholar
Smith, L., 2004: Archaeological theory and the politics of heritage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., 2006: Uses of heritage, London.Google Scholar
Smith, A.T., 2004: The end of the essential archaeological subject. Archaeological dialogues 11 (1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C., 1994: The politics of recognition, in Gutmann, A. (ed), Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ, 2573.Google Scholar
Waterton, E., 2010: Politics, policy and the discourses of heritage in Britain, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Waterton, E., and Smith, L. (eds), 2009: Taking archaeology out of heritage, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watson, S., 2009: Archaeology, visuality and the negotiation of heritage, in Waterton, E. and Smith, L. (eds), Taking archaeology out of heritage, Cambridge, 2847.Google Scholar
Winter, T., 2012: Heritage and nationalism. An unbreachable couple? Institute for Culture and Society Occasional Paper 3.4, 1–13, available at www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/413630/ICS_Occasional_Paper_Series_3_4_Winter_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Winter, T., 2013: Heritage studies and the privileging of theory. International journal of heritage studies, DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2013.798671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar