Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Nilsson Stutz, Liv 2013. Claims to the Past. A Critical View of the Arguments Driving Repatriation of Cultural Heritage and Their Role in Contemporary Identity Politics. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 170.


    Fazioli, K. Patrick 2012. From First Reich to Third Reich: German Imperialism and Early Medieval Scholarship in the Southeastern Alpine Region (c. 1919–1945). Archaeologies, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 116.


    Gramsch, Alexander 2010. Different languages. An interview on archaeology in Germany with Friedrich Lüth. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 17, Issue. 02, p. 199.


    Moro Abadía, Oscar 2010. Beyond externalism. Exploring new directions in the history of archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 17, Issue. 02, p. 215.


    Abadía, Oscar Moro 2009. The History of Archaeology as Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate: Historical Development and Current Challenges. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 13.


    ×

Archaeology in the Third Reich. Academic scholarship and the rise of the ‘lunatic fringe’

Abstract

In the 1920s, and especially during the Third Reich, the ‘lunatic fringe’ of prehistoric archaeology – in this case a group of pseudoscientists that used and created archaeological evidence to found their religious and political visions of the early past – has had a great influence on German archaeology. This group, often called archaeological Schwarmgeister (‘fanatic dreamers’), attempted with varying success to gain influence by occupying party positions and by initiating excavations that might not have occurred otherwise. By focusing on the activities of two pseudoscientists – Wilhelm Teudt and Hermann Wille – as case studies, it becomes clear that they reinforced the existing division (Ahnenerbe versus Amt Rosenberg) within professional archaeology. The reactions from academic archaeologists turn out to have been diverse. The theories of Wilhelm Teudt on the Germanic Externsteine were accepted by some professional archaeologists. At the megalithic graves in the Oldenburg area, where Hermann Wille was active, this did not happen. After 1945 their work was used in the accusations that the assistants of Amt Rosenberg especially had been involved in unscientific research. This accusation did not correspond with contemporary reality but was the result of the struggle for power and influence within the group of academic archaeologists that continued in post-war Germany.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Archaeological Dialogues
  • ISSN: 1380-2038
  • EISSN: 1478-2294
  • URL: /core/journals/archaeological-dialogues
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: