Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Deliberative Democracy and the Japanese Saiban-in (Lay Judge) Trial System

  • Noboru YANASE (a1)
Abstract

Since May 2009, public participation in the criminal justice system, known as saiban-in seido (trial system by lay judges), has been implemented in Japan. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the law-making process of the saiban-in system and present an evaluation of the system from the perspective of deliberative democracy. This paper concludes that, contrary to criticism from those who want to introduce a purer form of jury trial dominated by lay jurors, the current saiban-in system, which mixes three professional judges with six saiban-ins, should be viewed positively from the perspective of deliberative democracy.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Associate Professor of Constitutional Law, College of Law, Nihon University. LL.M. Keio University, 2002; Ph.D. Keio University, 2009. This research is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant-in-Aid Scientific Research (KAKENHI #257800166 and #16K03301). An earlier version of this paper was partly presented as “Concepts of Democracy in the Legislative Process of the Saiban-in System” at the fourth East Asian Law & Society Conference in Tokyo, Japan, held on 4–6 August 2015. The author would like to thank Setsuo Miyazawa for organizing the session on “Democracy and the Lay Judge System in Japan.” The author is also grateful to Malcolm Feeley, Satoru Shinomiya, and Dimitri Vanoverbeke for their detailed comments and suggestions. The author would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their thorough reviews, and highly appreciates their comments and suggestions, which contributed to improving the quality of this paper. Correspondence to Noboru Yanase, 2-3-1 Misaki-chou, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8375, Japan. E-mail address: yanase.noboru@nihon-u.ac.jp.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ackerman, Bruce (1991) We the People 1: Foundations, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Anderson, Kent, & Saint, Emma (2005) “Japan’s Quasi-Jury (Saiban-in) Law: An Annotated Translation of the Act Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials.” 6 Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 233283.
Anderson, Kent, & Nolan, Mark (2004) “Lay Participation in the Japanese Justice System: A Few Preliminary Thoughts Regarding the Lay Assessor System (saiban-in seido) from Domestic Historical and International Psychological Perspective.” 37 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 935992.
Azusazawa, Kazuyuki (2010) Saiban-in Seido to Koukai” [“Saiban-in System and Openness”]. 5 Yamanashi Gakuin Law Journal 3768.
Bessette, Joseph M. (1980) “Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government,” in R.A. Goldwin & W.A. Schambra, eds., How Democratic Is the Constitution?, Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 102116.
Cohen, Joshua (1997) “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in J. Bohman & W. Regh, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 6791.
Corey, Zachary, & Hans, Valerie P. (2010) “Japan’s New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action?12 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 7294.
Dryzek, John S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, Jon (1998) “Introduction,” in J. Elster, ed., Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.
Estlund, David M. (1993) “Who’s Afraid of Deliberative Democracy? On the Strategic/Deliberative Dichotomy in Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence.” 71 Texas Law Review 14371477.
Fukurai, Hiroshi (2007) “The Rebirth of Japan’s Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems: A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and U.S.” 40 Cornell International Law Journal 315354.
Fukurai, Hiroshi, & Kurosawa, Kaoru (2010) “Impact of the Popular Legal Participation on Forced Confessions and Wrongful Convictions in Japan’s Bureaucratic Courtroom: A Cross-National Analysis in the U.S. and Japan.” 7(7) US-China Law Review 118.
Gardner, James A. (1996) “Shut Up and Vote: A Critique of Deliberative Democracy and the Life of Talk.” 63 Tennessee Law Review 421452.
Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre Weiser, Philip J.& Simmons, Cindy (2010) The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, Robert E. (2005) Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goto, Akira (2014) “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” 42 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 117129.
Gutmann, Amy, & Thompson, Dennis (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hasebe, Yasuo (2000) Hikaku-funou na Kachi no Meiro [The Labyrinth of Incommensurable Value], Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Higuchi, Yoichi (1995) “ Saiban no Dokuritsu” [“Independence of Judiciary”], in Y. Higuchi, ed., 6 Kouza Kenpou-gaku [Lectures on Constitutional Study], Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha, 4166.
Ikeda, Osamu (2009) Kaisetsu Saiban-in Hou: Rippou no Keii to Kadai [Commentary on the Saiban-in Act: Legislative History and Agenda], 2nd edn, Tokyo: Koubundou Publishers.
Ishimatsu, Takeo, & Isa, Chihiro (2009) Saiban-in Hikkei: Hihan to Taiou no Shiten kara [Companion to Saiban-in: From the Perspective of Criticism and Accommodation], Tokyo: Chikumashobo.
Kaneko, Hajime (1947) Shihou Seido” [“Judicial System”], in Kokka Gakkai, ed., Shin-kempou no Kenkyu [Study on the New Constitution], Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing, 229243.
Leib, Ethan J. (2004) Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Levin, Douglas G. (2008) “ Saiban-in-Seido: Lost in Translation? How the Source of Power Underlying Japan’s Proposed Lay Assessor System May Determine Its Fate.” 10 Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 199234.
Levin, Mark, & Mackie, Adam (2013) “Truth or Consequences of the Justice System Reform Council: An English Language Bibliography from Japan’s Millennial Legal Reforms.” 14 Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 116.
Levin, Mark, & Tice, Virginia (2009) “Japan’s New Citizen Judges: How Secrecy Imperils Judicial Reform.” 7–19–6 Asia-Pacific Journal/Japan Focus 113.
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2007) “The Politics of Judicial Reform in Japan: The Rule of Law at Last?,” in W. P. Alford, ed., Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 107162.
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2013) “Successes, Failures, and Remaining Issues of the Justice System Reform in Japan: An Introduction to the Symposium Issue.” 36 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 313347.
Muraoka, Keiichi (2011) Saiban-in Seido to sono Tanjou: Hou no Keiju to Souzou no Kanten kara” [“Saiban-in Sytem and Its Introduction: From a Viewpoint of Reception and Creation of Law”], in A. Goto, ed., Higashi Ajia ni okeru Shimin no Keiji Shihou-sanka [Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in East Asia], Tokyo: Kokusai Shoin, 1330.
Nihon Bengoshi Rengou-kai [The Japan Federation of Bar Associations] (2004) “Saiban-in Seido, Keiji-saiban no Jujitsu, Jinsokuka oyobi Kensatsu Shinsa-kai Seido no Kokkaku-an ni taisuru Ikensho” [“Comments on the Outline of the Saiban-in System, Improvement and Speeding Up of Criminal Trials, and Prosecution Review Commission System”].
Nihon Shinbun Kyokai [The Japan Newspaper Publishers & Editors Association] (2004) “Saiban-in Seido Kokkaku-an ni taisuru Kenkai” [“Comments on the Outline of Saiban-in System”].
Oishi, Makoto (2014) Kempou Kougi [Japanese Constitutional Law], Vol. 1, 3rd edn, Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing.
Owens, Harrison L.E. (2016) “Trial by One’s Peers: The Need to Expand Japan’s Lay Judge System.” 25 Washington International Law Journal 191221.
Plogstedt, Antoinette (2013) “Citizen Judges in Japan: A Report Card for the Initial Three Years.” 23 Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 371428.
Saiban-in Seido ni kansuru Kentou-kai [The Investigative Committee on the Saiban-in System] (2013) “Saiban-in Seido ni kansuru Kentou-kai Torimatome Houkoku-sho” [“The Final Report of the Investigative Committee on the Saiban-in System”].
Saikou Saiban-sho Jimu Soukyoku [The General Secretariat of the Supreme Court] (2012) “Saiban-in Saiban Jisshi Jokyo no Kensho Houkoku-sho” [“The Verification Report of the Practices of the Saiban-in Trials”].
Saikou Saiban-sho Jimu Soukyoku Keiji Kyoku [Criminal Affairs Bureau, the General Secretariat of the Supreme Court] (1995) Waga-kuni de okonawareta Baishin Saiban: Shouwa Shoki ni okeru Baishin-hou no Unyou ni tsuite [Jury Trials Held in Japan: on the Administration of the Jury Act during the Early Showa Period], Tokyo: Shihou Kyoukai.
Sakamaki, Tadashi (2006) Saiban-in Seido no Igi to Kadai” [“The Meaning and Problem of the Saiban-in System”]. 308 Hougaku Kyoushitsu 1015.
Sato, Koji (2008) Gendai Kokka to Jinken [The Modern State and Human Rights], Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing.
Sato, Koji (2011) Nihon-koku Kempou-ron [On the Constitution of Japan], Tokyo: Seibundo Publishing.
Senger, Daniel (2011) “The Japanese Quasi-jury and the American Jury: A Comparative Assessment of Juror Questioning and Sentencing Procedure and Cultural Elements in Lay Judicial Participation.” 2011 University of Illinois Law Review 741774.
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (1999) “Ronten Seiri” [“The Points at Issue in the Justice Reform”].
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (2000) “Chuukan Houkoku” [“The Interim Report”].
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (2001) “Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai Ikensho: Nijuiseiki no Nihon wo Sasaeru Shihou-seido” [“Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: For a Justice System to Support Japan in the 21st Century”].
Shinohara, Hajime (2004) Shimin no Seiji-gaku: Tougi Demokurashi toha Nanika [Citizen’s Political Science: What is Deliberative Democracy?], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Shinohara, Hajime (2007) Rekishi Seijigaku to Demokurashi [Historical Political Science and Democracy], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Sunstein, Cass R. (1993) The Partial Constitution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2001) Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2007) Republic.com 2.0, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tamura, Tetsuki, (2008) Jukugi no Riyu: Minshushugi no Seiji-riron [Reasons for Deliberation: Democratic Theory in Reflective and Divided Societies], Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1835=1945) Democracy in America, Vol. 1, New York: Alfred A. Knopf (Henry Reeve tr., Francis Bowen rev., & Phillips Bradley ed.).
Tsuji, Hiroyuki (2007) ‘Saiban-in no sanka-suru Keiji Saiban ni kansuru Houritsu’ no Kaisetsu (1)” [“Commentary on ‘the Act on Criminal Trials with Participation of Saiban-in’: Part 1”]. 59 Houso Jiho 33121.
Vanoverbeke, Dimitri (2015) Juries in the Japanese Legal System: The Continuing Struggle for Citizen Participation and Democracy, London: Routledge.
Warren, Mark (2002) “Deliberative Democracy,” in A. Carter and G. Stokes, eds., Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, 173202.
Yanase, Noboru (2009) Saiban-in Seido no Rippougaku: Tougi-minshushugi Riron ni motoduku Kokumin no Shihou-sanka no Igi no Sai-kousei [Institutional Design of the Saiban-in System: Reanalysis of the Meaning of the General Public Participation in the Criminal Justice System based on the Theory of Deliberative Democracy], Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha.
Yanase, Noboru (2010) “The Meaning of the Peremptory Challenge in the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis,” in Y. Kobayashi & S.J. Lee, eds., Government and Participation in Japanese and Korean Civil Society, Tokyo: Bokutakusha Publisher, 221241.
Yanase, Noboru (2015) Jukuryo to Tougi no Minshushugi Riron: Chokusetsu-minshusei ha Daigisei wo Norikoerareruka [Debating Deliberative Democracy: Can Direct Democracy Override Representative Democracy?], Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.
Young, Iris Marion (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Asian Journal of Law and Society
  • ISSN: 2052-9015
  • EISSN: 2052-9023
  • URL: /core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed