Ackerman, Bruce (1991) We the People 1: Foundations, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Anderson, Kent, & Saint, Emma (2005) “Japan’s Quasi-Jury (Saiban-in) Law: An Annotated Translation of the Act Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials.” 6
Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal
Anderson, Kent, & Nolan, Mark (2004) “Lay Participation in the Japanese Justice System: A Few Preliminary Thoughts Regarding the Lay Assessor System (saiban-in seido) from Domestic Historical and International Psychological Perspective.” 37
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Azusazawa, Kazuyuki (2010) “Saiban-in Seido to Koukai” [“Saiban-in System and Openness”]. 5
Yamanashi Gakuin Law Journal
Bessette, Joseph M. (1980) “Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government,” in R.A. Goldwin & W.A. Schambra, eds., How Democratic Is the Constitution?, Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 102–116.
Cohen, Joshua (1997) “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in J. Bohman & W. Regh, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 67–91.
Corey, Zachary, & Hans, Valerie P. (2010) “Japan’s New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action?” 12
Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal
Dryzek, John S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, Jon (1998) “Introduction,” in J. Elster, ed., Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.
Estlund, David M. (1993) “Who’s Afraid of Deliberative Democracy? On the Strategic/Deliberative Dichotomy in Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence.” 71
Texas Law Review
Fukurai, Hiroshi (2007) “The Rebirth of Japan’s Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems: A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and U.S.” 40
Cornell International Law Journal
Fukurai, Hiroshi, & Kurosawa, Kaoru (2010) “Impact of the Popular Legal Participation on Forced Confessions and Wrongful Convictions in Japan’s Bureaucratic Courtroom: A Cross-National Analysis in the U.S. and Japan.” 7(7) US-China Law Review
Gardner, James A. (1996) “Shut Up and Vote: A Critique of Deliberative Democracy and the Life of Talk.” 63
Tennessee Law Review
Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre
Weiser, Philip J.& Simmons, Cindy (2010) The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, Robert E. (2005) Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goto, Akira (2014) “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” 42
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Gutmann, Amy, & Thompson, Dennis (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hasebe, Yasuo (2000)
Hikaku-funou na Kachi no Meiro [The Labyrinth of Incommensurable Value], Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Higuchi, Yoichi (1995) “
Saiban no Dokuritsu” [“Independence of Judiciary”], in Y. Higuchi, ed.,
6 Kouza Kenpou-gaku [Lectures on Constitutional Study], Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha, 41–66.
Ikeda, Osamu (2009)
Kaisetsu Saiban-in Hou: Rippou no Keii to Kadai [Commentary on the Saiban-in Act: Legislative History and Agenda], 2nd edn, Tokyo: Koubundou Publishers.
Ishimatsu, Takeo, & Isa, Chihiro (2009)
Saiban-in Hikkei: Hihan to Taiou no Shiten kara [Companion to Saiban-in: From the Perspective of Criticism and Accommodation], Tokyo: Chikumashobo.
Kaneko, Hajime (1947) “Shihou Seido” [“Judicial System”], in Kokka Gakkai, ed.,
Shin-kempou no Kenkyu [Study on the New Constitution], Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing, 229–243.
Leib, Ethan J. (2004) Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Levin, Douglas G. (2008) “
Saiban-in-Seido: Lost in Translation? How the Source of Power Underlying Japan’s Proposed Lay Assessor System May Determine Its Fate.” 10
Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal
Levin, Mark, & Mackie, Adam (2013) “Truth or Consequences of the Justice System Reform Council: An English Language Bibliography from Japan’s Millennial Legal Reforms.” 14
Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal
Levin, Mark, & Tice, Virginia (2009) “Japan’s New Citizen Judges: How Secrecy Imperils Judicial Reform.” 7–19–6
Asia-Pacific Journal/Japan Focus
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2007) “The Politics of Judicial Reform in Japan: The Rule of Law at Last?,” in W. P. Alford, ed., Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 107–162.
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2013) “Successes, Failures, and Remaining Issues of the Justice System Reform in Japan: An Introduction to the Symposium Issue.” 36
Hastings International and Comparative Law Review
Muraoka, Keiichi (2011) “Saiban-in Seido to sono Tanjou: Hou no Keiju to Souzou no Kanten kara” [“Saiban-in Sytem and Its Introduction: From a Viewpoint of Reception and Creation of Law”], in A. Goto, ed.,
Higashi Ajia ni okeru Shimin no Keiji Shihou-sanka [Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in East Asia], Tokyo: Kokusai Shoin, 13–30.
Nihon Bengoshi Rengou-kai [The Japan Federation of Bar Associations] (2004) “Saiban-in Seido, Keiji-saiban no Jujitsu, Jinsokuka oyobi Kensatsu Shinsa-kai Seido no Kokkaku-an ni taisuru Ikensho” [“Comments on the Outline of the Saiban-in System, Improvement and Speeding Up of Criminal Trials, and Prosecution Review Commission System”].
Nihon Shinbun Kyokai [The Japan Newspaper Publishers & Editors Association] (2004) “Saiban-in Seido Kokkaku-an ni taisuru Kenkai” [“Comments on the Outline of Saiban-in System”].
Oishi, Makoto (2014)
Kempou Kougi [Japanese Constitutional Law], Vol. 1, 3rd edn, Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing.
Owens, Harrison L.E. (2016) “Trial by One’s Peers: The Need to Expand Japan’s Lay Judge System.” 25
Washington International Law Journal
Plogstedt, Antoinette (2013) “Citizen Judges in Japan: A Report Card for the Initial Three Years.” 23
Indiana International & Comparative Law Review
Saiban-in Seido ni kansuru Kentou-kai [The Investigative Committee on the Saiban-in System] (2013) “Saiban-in Seido ni kansuru Kentou-kai Torimatome Houkoku-sho” [“The Final Report of the Investigative Committee on the Saiban-in System”].
Saikou Saiban-sho Jimu Soukyoku [The General Secretariat of the Supreme Court] (2012) “Saiban-in Saiban Jisshi Jokyo no Kensho Houkoku-sho” [“The Verification Report of the Practices of the Saiban-in Trials”].
Saikou Saiban-sho Jimu Soukyoku Keiji Kyoku [Criminal Affairs Bureau, the General Secretariat of the Supreme Court] (1995)
Waga-kuni de okonawareta Baishin Saiban: Shouwa Shoki ni okeru Baishin-hou no Unyou ni tsuite [Jury Trials Held in Japan: on the Administration of the Jury Act during the Early Showa Period], Tokyo: Shihou Kyoukai.
Sakamaki, Tadashi (2006) “Saiban-in Seido no Igi to Kadai” [“The Meaning and Problem of the Saiban-in System”]. 308
Sato, Koji (2008)
Gendai Kokka to Jinken [The Modern State and Human Rights], Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing.
Sato, Koji (2011)
Nihon-koku Kempou-ron [On the Constitution of Japan], Tokyo: Seibundo Publishing.
Senger, Daniel (2011) “The Japanese Quasi-jury and the American Jury: A Comparative Assessment of Juror Questioning and Sentencing Procedure and Cultural Elements in Lay Judicial Participation.” 2011
University of Illinois Law Review
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (1999) “Ronten Seiri” [“The Points at Issue in the Justice Reform”].
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (2000) “Chuukan Houkoku” [“The Interim Report”].
Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai [Justice System Reform Council] (2001) “Shihou-seido Kaikaku Shingi-kai Ikensho: Nijuiseiki no Nihon wo Sasaeru Shihou-seido” [“Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: For a Justice System to Support Japan in the 21st Century”].
Shinohara, Hajime (2004)
Shimin no Seiji-gaku: Tougi Demokurashi toha Nanika [Citizen’s Political Science: What is Deliberative Democracy?], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Shinohara, Hajime (2007)
Rekishi Seijigaku to Demokurashi [Historical Political Science and Democracy], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Sunstein, Cass R. (1993) The Partial Constitution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2001) Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2007) Republic.com 2.0, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tamura, Tetsuki, (2008)
Jukugi no Riyu: Minshushugi no Seiji-riron [Reasons for Deliberation: Democratic Theory in Reflective and Divided Societies], Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1835=1945) Democracy in America, Vol. 1, New York: Alfred A. Knopf (Henry Reeve tr., Francis Bowen rev., & Phillips Bradley ed.).
Tsuji, Hiroyuki (2007) “‘Saiban-in no sanka-suru Keiji Saiban ni kansuru Houritsu’ no Kaisetsu (1)” [“Commentary on ‘the Act on Criminal Trials with Participation of Saiban-in’: Part 1”]. 59
Vanoverbeke, Dimitri (2015) Juries in the Japanese Legal System: The Continuing Struggle for Citizen Participation and Democracy, London: Routledge.
Warren, Mark (2002) “Deliberative Democracy,” in A. Carter and G. Stokes, eds., Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, 173–202.
Yanase, Noboru (2009)
Saiban-in Seido no Rippougaku: Tougi-minshushugi Riron ni motoduku Kokumin no Shihou-sanka no Igi no Sai-kousei [Institutional Design of the Saiban-in System: Reanalysis of the Meaning of the General Public Participation in the Criminal Justice System based on the Theory of Deliberative Democracy], Tokyo: Nippon Hyoron Sha.
Yanase, Noboru (2010) “The Meaning of the Peremptory Challenge in the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis,” in Y. Kobayashi & S.J. Lee, eds., Government and Participation in Japanese and Korean Civil Society, Tokyo: Bokutakusha Publisher, 221–241.
Yanase, Noboru (2015)
Jukuryo to Tougi no Minshushugi Riron: Chokusetsu-minshusei ha Daigisei wo Norikoerareruka [Debating Deliberative Democracy: Can Direct Democracy Override Representative Democracy?], Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.
Young, Iris Marion (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.