Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Maathumai Nirmalendran (a1), Michael Sherris (a2) and Katja Hanewald (a3)

This paper provides a detailed quantitative assessment of the impact of capital and default probability on product pricing and shareholder value for a life insurer providing life annuities. A multi-period cash flow model, allowing for stochastic mortality and asset returns, imperfectly elastic product demand, as well as frictional costs, is used to derive value-maximizing capital and pricing strategies for a range of one-year default probability levels reflecting differences in regulatory regimes including Solvency II. The model is calibrated using realistic assumptions. The sensitivity of results is assessed. The results show that value-maximizing life insurers should target higher solvency levels than the Solvency II regulatory one-year 99.5% probability under assumptions of reasonable levels of policyholder's aversion to insolvency risk. Even in the case of less restrictive solvency probabilities, policyholder price elasticity and solvency preferences are shown to be important factors for a life insurer's value-maximizing strategy.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

[9] H. Gründl , T. Post and R. Schulze (2006) To hedge or not to hedge: Managing demographic risk in life insurance companies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73 (1), 1941.

[12] R. D. Lee and L. Carter (1992) Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87 (419), 659671.

[14] R. Rees , H. Gravelle and A. Wambach (1999) Regulation of insurance markets. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 24 (1), 5568.

[18] O. Vasicek (1977) An equilibrium characterisation of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (2), 177188.

[20] S. Yow and M. Sherris (2008) Enterprise risk management, insurer value maximisation, and market frictions. ASTIN Bulletin 38 (1), 293339.

[21] G. Zanjani (2002) Pricing and capital allocation in catastrophe insurance. Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (2), 283305.

[23] A. Zimmer , C. Schade and H. Gründl (2009) Is default risk acceptable when purchasing insurance? Experimental evidence for different probability representations, reasons for default, and framings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (1), 1123.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA
  • ISSN: 0515-0361
  • EISSN: 1783-1350
  • URL: /core/journals/astin-bulletin-journal-of-the-iaa
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 181 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.