Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article

Connecting Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory's Information-Processing Styles With Organisational-Influencing Tactics: Rational Thinkers are Rational Persuaders

  • Guy J. Curtis (a1) and Mindy W.H. Lee (a1)
Abstract

Several recent studies have connected information-processing styles, as described by Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST), with important workplace behaviours, including leadership and conflict-handling styles. This article extends such research by examining the connection between CEST information-processing styles and organisational-influencing tactics. In Study 1 (N = 119), the CEST information-processing styles of behavioural coping and rational thinking were positively correlated with the use of rationality as an influencing tactic, as measured by the Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies. In Study 2 (N = 142), a broader self-report measure of influencing tactics was used; behavioural coping and rational thinking were positively correlated with effective influencing tactics such as rational persuasion. Together, behavioural coping and rational thinking accounted for more than 31% of the variance in preference for rational persuasion as an influencing tactic. Additionally, the apprising tactic was positively correlated with both behavioural coping and rational thinking. These findings emphasise the importance of examining individual differences in information-processing preferences to understand key elements of organisational behaviour.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © The Authors 2013 
Corresponding author
address for correspondence: Guy Curtis, School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch WA 6150, Australia. Email: g.curtis@murdoch.edu.au
References
Hide All
Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336–355.
Atwater, L.E., & Yammarino, F.J. (1993). Personal attributes as predictors of superiors’ and subordinates’ perceptions of military academic leadership. Human Relations, 46, 645–668.
Barbuto, J.E., Fritz, S., Matkin, B.A., & Marx, D. (2007). Effects of gender, education, and age upon leaders’ use of influence tactics and full range leadership behaviors. Sex Roles, 56, 71–83.
Barcikowski, R.S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6, 267–285.
Bass, B.M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries. American Psychologist, 52, 130–139.
Behfar, K.J., Peterson, R.S., Mannix, E.A., & Trochim, W.M.K. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 170–188.
Cable, D.M., & Judge, T.A. (2003). Managers’ upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 197–214.
Cerni, T., Curtis, G.J., & Colmar, S.H. (2008). Information processing and leadership styles: Constructive thinking and transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2, 60–73.
Cerni, T., Curtis, G.J., & Colmar, S.H. (2010a). Executive coaching can enhance transformational leadership. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 81–85.
Cerni, T., Curtis, G.J., & Colmar, S.H. (2010b). Increasing transformational leadership by developing leaders’ information-processing systems. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4 (3), 51–65.
Cerni, T., Curtis, G.J., & Colmar, S.H. (2012). Cognitive-experiential self theory and conflict-handling styles: Rational and experiential systems are related to the integrating and compromising conflict-handling styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23, 362–381.
Cheng, J.L.C. (1983). Organizational context and upward influence: An experimental study of the use of power tactics. Group Organization Management, 8, 337–355.
Charbonneau, D. (2004). Influence tactics and perceptions of transformational leadership. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 25, 565–576.
Conway, J.M., & Lance, C.E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common methods bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.
Curtis, G.J. (2013). Leadership: Power and influence. In Sarris, A. & Kirby, N. (Eds), Organisational psychology: Research and professional practice (pp. 289–316). Tilde University Press.
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L.F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.
Dubinsky, A.J., Yammarino, F.J., & Jolson, M.A. (1995). An examination of linkages between personal characteristics and dimensions of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 315–334.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
Epstein, S. (1998a). Cognitive-experiential self theory: A dual-process personality theory with implications for diagnosis and psychotherapy. In Bornstein, R.F. & Masling, J.M. (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on the psychoanalytic unconscious (pp. 99–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Epstein, S. (1998b). Constructive thinking: The key to emotional intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
Epstein, S. (2001). Constructive Thinking Inventory: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 332–350.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.
Falbe, C.M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638–652.
Fu, P.P., & Yukl, G. (2000). Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the United States and China. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 251–266.
Furst, S.A., & Cable, D.M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 453–462.
Hendel, T., Fish, M., & Galon, V. (2005). Leadership style and choice of strategy in conflict management among Israeli nurse managers in general hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 13, 137–146.
Humphreys, J.H., & Zettel, M.C. (2002). Transformational leader self-perception and objective sales performance: The potential moderating effects of behavioral coping ability. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 1, 9–23.
Judge, T.A., & Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.
Mahoney, K.T., Buboltz, W., Levin, I.P., Doverspike, D., & Svyantek, D.J. (2011). Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 248–257.
Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79, 1043–1080.
Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles of personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987.
Rao, A., Hashimoto, K., & Rao, A. (1997). Universal and culturally specific aspects of managerial influence: A study of Japanese managers. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 295–312.
Schriesheim, C.A., & Hinkin, T.R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 246–257.
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H.F. (2001). Effects of influence tactics and social contexts in conflict: An experiment in relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 239–258.
Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Falbe, C. M. (1996). Antecedents of influence outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 309–317.
Yukl, G., Seifert, C.F., & Chavez, C. (2008). Validation of the extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 609–621.
Yukl, G., & Tracey, J.B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2054-2232
  • URL: /core/journals/australasian-journal-of-organisational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 23 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×