Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:15:36.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advancing the Curriculum for Young People who have an Intellectual Disability. Advocacy in Health: A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Suzanne Carrington  and
Nick Lennox
Suzanne Carrington*
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Nick Lennox
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. School of Learning and Professional Studies, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia E-mail: sx.carrington@qut.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on the pilot work for a collaborative National Health and Medical Research Council project in Australia involving education and health professionals to improve the health and well-being of young people who have an intellectual disability. The pilot study was a qualitative exploration of teacher experiences using a health diary as part of the special education curriculum over a six-month period. The research questions were: (1) How did teachers include health-related matters in the curriculum before use of the Ask Health Diary?; and (2) How did teachers and students use the Ask Health Diary as a component of the school curriculum and what were the benefits? The Ask Health Diary was used to introduce students to the concept of self-advocacy in relation to their health needs and provide practical strategies for supporting students’ learning about self-advocacy in relation to their health. The reported data indicates that the Ask Health Diary was a popular resource for students and teachers and raised awareness of the importance of developing the communication skills and independent living abilities necessary for young people to advocate for their own health needs. The pilot study indicates that there is merit in including the diary in a health-based school curriculum for adolescents who have an intellectual disability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , September 2008 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–39.Google Scholar
Bambara, L. M., Browder, D. M., & Koger, F. (2006). Home and community. In Snell, M. E., & Brown, F. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 526–568). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Beange, H., McElduff, A., & Baker, W. (1995). Medical disorders of adults with mental retardation: A population study. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 99(6), 595–604.Google ScholarPubMed
Giangreco, M. (2006). Foundational concepts and practices for educating students with severe disabilities. In Snell, M. E., & Brown, F. (Eds.). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. (pp. 1–27). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M. F., Cloninger, C. J., & Iverson, V. S. (1998). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Haelewyck, M., Bara, M., & Lachapelle, Y. (2005). Facilitating self-determination in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Evaluation Review, 29(5), 490–502.Google Scholar
Lennox, N. G., Taylor, M., Rey-Conde, T., Bain, C., Boyle, F. M., & Purdie, D. M. (2004). Ask for it: Development of a health advocacy intervention for adults with intellectual disability and their general practitioners. Health Promotion International, 19(2), 167–175.Google Scholar
Lennox, N., Bain, C., Rey-Conde, T., Purdie, D., Bush, R., & Pandeya, N. (2007). Effects of a comprehensive health assessment programme for Australian adults with intellectual disablity: A cluster randomized trial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 139–146.Google Scholar
Peck, S. (2004). Communication made easier. Facilitating transitions for students with multiple disabilities. Exceptional Children, 36(5), 60–63.Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In Sands, D. S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the lifespan: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 17–36). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16(4), 337–359.Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58–69.Google Scholar
Wiersma, W. (1991). Research methods in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar