Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Use of Individual Education Programs for Children in Australian Schools

  • Ian Dempsey (a1)
Abstract

A cornerstone of special education practice is customising instruction to meet individual students’ needs. Individual education programs (IEPs) are used in many countries to document the manner in which such instruction is customised and to provide a record of student outcomes. Using 2009 data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, this paper examines a range of student and school variables associated with Australian children aged 8 to 9 years who had an IEP at the time. There were significant differences across government, Catholic and independent schools, and significant differences across the states and territories in the use of IEPs. The Discussion section of the paper explores possible reasons for those differences and the desirability for more consistent use of IEPs with students with a disability in Australia.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Ian Dempsey, Centre for Special Education and Disability Studies, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. E-mail: ian.dempsey@newcastle.edu.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I. Dempsey (2004). Recent changes in the proportion of students identified with a disability in Australian schools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 29, 172175. doi:10.1080/13668250410001709511

I. Dempsey (2011). Trends in the proportion of students with a disability in Australian schools, 2000–2009. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36, 144145. doi:10.1080/13668250.2011.573777

M. Hojat , & G. Xu (2004). A visitor's guide to effect sizes: Statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 241249.

J.M. Kauffman (2008). Would we recognize progress if we saw it? A commentary. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 128143. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9060-z

K.A. Kavale , & S.R. Forness (2000). History, rhetoric and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279296. doi:10.1177/074193250002100505

E.C. Lynch , & P.L. Beare (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 4855. doi:10.1177/074193259001100207

S.L. Odom , E. Brantlinger , R. Gersten , R.H. Horner , B. Thompson , & K.R. Harris (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137148.

J. Stephenson (2006). Different traditions and practices: Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. In P. Aubusson & S. Schuck (Eds.), Teacher learning and development: The mirror maze — Self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 3, pp. 117130). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4642-1_7

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Australasian Journal of Special Education
  • ISSN: 1030-0112
  • EISSN: 1833-6914
  • URL: /core/journals/australasian-journal-of-special-education
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 117 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.