Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Inspiration From the Classroom: A Mixed Method Case Study of Interdisciplinary Sustainability Learning in Higher Education

  • Sue Noy (a1), Rebecca Patrick (a2), Teresa Capetola (a2) and Janine McBurnie (a1)

Abstract

Within higher education there is widespread support for developing students’ interdisciplinary skills. Despite this, evidence for, and practice of, cross-faculty interdisciplinary sustainability learning remains in its infancy. Recent articles have shown that Australia is no exception. This article provides a case study of interdisciplinary learning and teaching within a cross-faculty Education for Sustainability (EfS) undergraduate subject involving science, arts, business, and health students at an Australian university. A description of the subject and its theoretical context provides a platform for presenting the findings of a mixed method enquiry into how pedagogy supports interdisciplinary sustainability learning. The sequential explanatory research design involved a post-subject quantitative survey analysed using SPSS, augmented by qualitative student journal data (n = 67) using phenomenological analysis within NVivo. The study found that students, regardless of discipline background, valued the processes and pedagogy used to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and awareness. The experience left students feeling more skilled and confident of their ability to contribute to future interdisciplinary sustainability collaboration. This case study, replete with a subject description, theoretical context for an innovative pedagogical approach and study results, provides higher education professionals with a template for deliberative curriculum and pedagogy that promote interdisciplinary knowledge, skills and confidence that may contribute to transformative learning that supports EfS goals. The article presents a strong case for future EfS curriculum frameworks and strategic education policy to include deliberative interdisciplinary pedagogy. It also challenges higher education institutions to create flexible systems that facilitate cross-faculty interdisciplinary learning that is necessary for preparing students for the future.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Sue Noy, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC 3125, Australia. Email: s.noy@deakin.edu.au

References

Hide All
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665683.
Beilin, R., & Bender, H. (2010). The getting of interdisciplinarity: the everyday practice of environnmental curriculum design. In Davies, M. & Devlin, M. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary higher education: Perspectives and practicalities (pp. 181193). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Bender, H. (Ed.) (2011). Reshaping environments: Theory and practice in a complex world. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
Briggs, L. (2012). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.apsc.gov.au/publications-and-media/archive/publications-archive/tackling-wicked-problems.
Brookfield, S. D. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1994). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 349362.
Buszard, D., & Kolb, J. (2011). Institutional innovation to deliver post-secondary education for sustainability. Sustainability, 4, 8084.
Christie, B. A., Miller, K. K., Cooke, R., & White, J. G. (2012). Environmental sustainability in higher education: How do academics teach? Environmental Education Research, 19, 385414.
Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 30, 7586.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. (2009). Living sustainably: The Australian Government's National Action Plan for Education for Sustainability. Canberra, Australia: Author.
Fenner School of Environment and Society. (2016). Fenner School — About us. Retrieved from http://fennerschool.anu.edu.au/about-us
Gale, F., Davison, A., Wood, G., Williams, S., & Towle, N. (2015). Four impediments to embedding education for sustainability in higher education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 248263.
Global University Network for Innovation. (2011). Higher education in the world 4: Higher education's commitment to sustainability: From understanding to action. Retrieved from http://www.guninetwork.org/report/higher-education-world-4/documents
Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary subjects (9780734041234). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne
Granados-Sánchez, J., Wals, A. E. J., Ferrer-Balas, D., Waas, T., Imaz, M., Nortier, S., Svantröm, M., Van't Land, H., & Arriaga, G. (2011). Sustainability in higher education: Moving from understanding to action, breaking barriers for transformation. In Global University Network for Innovation (Ed.), Higher Education in the World, 4: Higher Education's Commitment to Sustainability: From Understanding to Action (pp. 193207). Barcelona, Spain: Global University Network for Innovation.
Higgins, A., & Thomas, A. (2016). Education for sustainability in universities: Challenges and opportunities for change. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 91108.
Hocking, C., & Riddle, M. (2014). Aiming for full coverage — Integrating sustainability education into all undergraduate courses at La Trobe University, Australia: Achievements, lessons learnt and barriers addressed. In Brandli, L., O. G. Kuznet va, Leal Filho, W., & Paço, A. M. F. d. (Eds.), Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level: making the links (pp. 479493): Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Jones, P., Selby, D., & Sterling, S. (2010). Sustainability Education: Perspectives and practice across higher education. London, UK: Earthscan.
Jones, S., & Watt, K. (2010). Pluridisciplinary learning and assessment: Reflections on practice. In Davies, M., Devlin, M., & Tight, M. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary higher education: Perspectives and practicalities (vol. 5, pp. 195207). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Leihy, P., & Salazar, J. (2011). Education for sustainability in university curricula. Policies and practice in Victoria.
McClam, S., & Flores-Scott, E. M. (2012). Transdisciplinary teaching and research: What is possible in higher education? Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 231243.
Mansilla, V. B. (2010). Learning to synthesize: A cognitive-epistemological foundation for interdisciplinary learning. In Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Mitchman, C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 288306). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mansilla, V. B., Duraisingh, E. D., Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 334353.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Moore, J., Pagani, F., Quayle, M., Robinson, J., Sawada, B., Spiegelman, G., & Van Wynsberghe, R. (2005). Recreating the university from within: Collaborative reflections on the University of British Columbia's engagement with sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6, 6580.
Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
O'Byrne, D., Dripps, W., & Nicholas, K. A. (2015). Teaching and learning sustainability: An assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustainability Science, 10, 4359.
Peters, J. M. (1997). Reflections on action research. In Quigley, B. A. & Kuhne, G. W. (Eds.), Creating practical knowledge through action research: Posing problems, solving problems, and improving daily practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2014). Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education, 67, 7190.
RMIT University. (2017). Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/our-strategy/values/living-our-values/sustainability
Scottish Government. (2010). Learning for change: Scotland's action plan for the second half of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Edinburgh, Scotland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2010/05/20152453/7
Sherren, K. (2005). Balancing the disciplines: A multidisciplinary perspective on sustainability curriculum content. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 97106.
Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 6886.
Sriskandarajah, N., Bawden, R., Blackmore, C., Tidball, K. G., & Wals, A. E. J. (2010). Resilience in learning systems: Case studies in university education. Environmental Education Research, 16, 559573.
Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16, 511528.
Sterling, S. R., Maxey, L., & Luna, H. (Eds.). (2013). The sustainable university: Progress and prospects. London, UK: Routledge.
Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainability: A guide for educators on teaching and learning approaches. Retrieved from http://www.glos.ac.uk/docs/download/Sustainability/Education-for-Sustainability-A-Guide-for-Educators-on-Teaching-and-Learning-Approaches.pdf
Tilbury, D., & Cooke, K. (2005). A national review of environmental education and its contribution to sustainability in Australia: Frameworks for sustainability — Key findings. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES).
UNESCO. (2009b). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development 2009. Key findings & ways forward. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001877/187757e.pdf
University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (ULSF). (2000). Talloires Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires.html
Vincent, S., & Focht, W. (2010). Environmental reviews and case studies: In search of common ground: Exploring identity and core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs. Environmental Practice, 12, 7686.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed., vol. 5). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Australian Journal of Environmental Education
  • ISSN: 0814-0626
  • EISSN: 2049-775X
  • URL: /core/journals/australian-journal-of-environmental-education
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed