Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
CrossRef.
Berry, Diane S.
2000.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 32.
Vol. 32,
Issue. ,
p.
273.
Marlowe, F.
2000.
Paternal investment and the human mating system.
Behavioural Processes,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1-3,
p.
45.
Buss, D
2000.
Number of children desired and preferred spousal age difference: context-specific mate preference patterns across 37 cultures.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
323.
Kenrick, Douglas T.
Sundie, Jill M.
Nicastle, Lionel D.
and
Stone, Gregory O.
2001.
Can one ever be too wealthy or too chaste? Searching for nonlinearities in mate judgment..
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 3,
p.
462.
Geary, David C.
DeSoto, M. Catherine
Hoard, Mary K.
Sheldon, Melanie Skaggs
and
Cooper, M. Lynne
2001.
Estrogens and relationship jealousy.
Human Nature,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
299.
Bleske-Rechek, April L.
and
Buss, David M.
2001.
Opposite-Sex Friendship: Sex Differences and Similarities in Initiation, Selection, and Dissolution.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 10,
p.
1310.
Berry, Diane S.
and
Miller, Katherine M.
2001.
When Boy Meets Girl: Attractiveness and the Five-Factor Model in Opposite-Sex Interactions.
Journal of Research in Personality,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 1,
p.
62.
SCHEIB, JOANNA E.
2001.
Context-specific mate choice criteria: Women's trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships.
Personal Relationships,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
371.
Gangestad, Steven W.
Bennett, Kevin L.
and
Thornhill, Randy
2001.
A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 268,
Issue. 1477,
p.
1677.
Downes, Stephen M.
2001.
Some Recent Developments in Evolutionary Approaches to the Study of Human Cognition and Behavior.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5,
p.
575.
Little, A. C.
Burt, D. M.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
and
Perrett, D. I.
2001.
Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 268,
Issue. 1462,
p.
39.
Durrant, Russil
and
Haig, Brian D.
2001.
How to pursue the adaptationist program in psychology.
Philosophical Psychology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
357.
Jones, B.C
Little, A.C
Penton-Voak, I.S
Tiddeman, B.P
Burt, D.M
and
Perrett, D.I
2001.
Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 6,
p.
417.
Schmitt, David P.
and
Buss, David M.
2001.
Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships..
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 6,
p.
894.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
Jones, B. C.
Little, A. C.
Baker, S.
Tiddeman, B.
Burt, D. M.
and
Perrett, D. I.
2001.
Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 268,
Issue. 1476,
p.
1617.
SCHMITT, DAVID P.
SHACKELFORD, TODD K.
DUNTLEY, JOSHUA
TOOKE, WILLIAM
and
BUSS, DAVID M.
2001.
The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies.
Personal Relationships,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
425.
Koehler, Nicole
Rhodes, Gillian
and
Simmons, Leigh W.
2002.
Are human female preferences for symmetrical male faces enhanced when conception is likely?.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 2,
p.
233.
Kirkpatrick, Lee A.
Waugh, Christian E.
Valencia, Alelhie
and
Webster, Gregory D.
2002.
The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression..
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 5,
p.
756.
Rommel, Ward
2002.
Sexual Selection and Human Behaviour.
Social Science Information,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
439.
Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C.
and
Eagly, Alice H.
2002.
Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing the Traditional Female Gender Role.
Psychology of Women Quarterly,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 4,
p.
322.