Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Concepts, correlations, and some challenges for connectionist cognition

  • Gary F. Marcus (a1) and Frank C. Keil (a2)

Rogers & McClelland's (R&M's) précis represents an important effort to address key issues in concepts and categorization, but few of the simulations deliver what is promised. We argue that the models are seriously underconstrained, importantly incomplete, and psychologically implausible; more broadly, R&M dwell too heavily on the apparent successes without comparable concern for limitations already noted in the literature.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. R. Anderson & J. Betz (2001) A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8(4):629–47.

B. C. Love , D. L. Medin & T. M. Gureckis (2004) SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review 111(2):309–32.

G. F. Marcus (1998b) Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 37(3):243–82.

R. M. Nosofsky (1986) Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1):3961.

S. Pinker & A. Prince (1988) On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28:73193.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

This erratum applies to the following article(s)