Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

God, the devil, and the details: Fleshing out the predictive processing framework

  • Daniel Rasmussen (a1) and Chris Eliasmith (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The predictive processing framework lacks many of the architectural and implementational details needed to fully investigate or evaluate the ideas it presents. One way to begin to fill in these details is by turning to standard control-theoretic descriptions of these types of systems (e.g., Kalman filters), and by building complex, unified computational models in biologically realistic neural simulations.

God is in the details

— Mies van der Rohe

The devil is in the details

— Anonymous

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. Craik (1943) The nature of explanation. Cambridge University Press.

C. Eliasmith , T. C. Stewart , X. Choo , T. Bekolay , T. DeWolf , Y. Tang & D. Rasmussen (2012) A large-scale model of the functioning brain. Science 338(6111):1202–205.

R. E. Kalman (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME – Journal of Basic Engineering (Series D) 82:3545.

B. R. Townsend , L. Paninski & R. N. Lemon (2006) Linear encoding of muscle activity in primary motor cortex and cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology 96(5): 2578–92.

O. Tudusciuc & A. Nieder (2009) Contributions of primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to length and numerosity representation. Journal of Neurophysiology 101(6):2984–94.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score