Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:12:25.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If you've got an effect, test its significance; if you've got a weak effect, do a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

John F. Kihlstrom
John F. Kihlstrom
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 kihlstrm@cogsci.berkeley.edu socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Statistical significance testing has its problems, but so do the alternatives that are proposed; and the alternatives may be both more cumbersome and less informative. Significance tests remain legitimate aspects of the rhetoric of scientific persuasion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 205 - 206
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)