Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Towards a universal model of reading

  • Ram Frost (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In the last decade, reading research has seen a paradigmatic shift. A new wave of computational models of orthographic processing that offer various forms of noisy position or context-sensitive coding have revolutionized the field of visual word recognition. The influx of such models stems mainly from consistent findings, coming mostly from European languages, regarding an apparent insensitivity of skilled readers to letter order. Underlying the current revolution is the theoretical assumption that the insensitivity of readers to letter order reflects the special way in which the human brain encodes the position of letters in printed words. The present article discusses the theoretical shortcomings and misconceptions of this approach to visual word recognition. A systematic review of data obtained from a variety of languages demonstrates that letter-order insensitivity is neither a general property of the cognitive system nor a property of the brain in encoding letters. Rather, it is a variant and idiosyncratic characteristic of some languages, mostly European, reflecting a strategy of optimizing encoding resources, given the specific structure of words. Since the main goal of reading research is to develop theories that describe the fundamental and invariant phenomena of reading across orthographies, an alternative approach to model visual word recognition is offered. The dimensions of a possible universal model of reading, which outlines the common cognitive operations involved in orthographic processing in all writing systems, are discussed.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Acha & M. Perea (2010) Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology 57:245–51.

J. S. Adelman , S. J. Marquis & M. G. Sabatos-DeVito (2011) Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science 21:1799–801.

S. Bentin & R. Frost (1987) Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory and Cognition 15:1323.

S. Bentin , R. Hammer & S. Cahan (1991) The effects of aging and first grade schooling on the development of phonological awareness. American Psychological Science 2:271–74.

P. Bertelson , J. Morais , J. Alegria & A. Content (1985) Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read. Nature 313:7374.

R. Bertram & J. Hyönä (2003) The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 48:615–34.

W. Bialek , I. Nemenman & N. Tishby (2001) Predictability, complexity, and learning. Neural Computation 13:2409–63.

S. R. Borgwaldt , F. M. Hellwig & A. M. B. De Groot (2005) Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 18:211–29.

J. S. Bowers & Y. Michita (1998) An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji–Hiragana priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5:259–64.

M. Brysbaert (2001) Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all. Memory and Cognition 29:765–73.

M. Coltheart , K. Rastle , C. Perry , R. Langdon & J. Ziegler (2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108:204–56.

C. J. Davis (2010) The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 117:713–58.

S. Dehaene , L. Cohen , M. Sigman & F. Vinckier (2005) The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:335–41.

A. Deutsch , R. Frost , S. Peleg , A. Pollatsek & K. Rayner (2003) Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10(2):415–22.

A. Deutsch , R. Frost , A. Pollatsek & K. Rayner (2000) Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes 15:487506.

A. Deutsch & K. Rayner (1999) Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes 14:393421.

K. Diependaele , J. Ziegler & J. Grainger (2010) Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22:764–78.

J. A. Duñabeitia , M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2007) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition 105(3):691703.

A. D. Endress & J. Mehler (2009) The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. Journal of Memory and Language 60:351–67.

J. Evans , J. Saffran & K. Robe-Torres (2009) Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52:321–36.

L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (1992) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 45:353–72.

K. I. Forster & C. Davis (1991) The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language 30:125.

K. I. Forster , C. Davis , C. Schocknecht & R. Carter (1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 39:211–51.

N. Friedmann , D. Dotan & E. Rahamim (2010) Is the visual analyzer orthographic-specific? Reading words and numbers in letter position dyslexia. Cortex 46:9821004.

N. Friedmann & A. Gvion (2001) Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18:673–96.

N. Friedmann & A. Gvion (2005) Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioural Neurology 16:145–58.

R. Frost (1998) Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123(1):7199.

R. Frost (2006) Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science 9:439–40.

R. Frost , M. Ahissar , R. Gottesman & S. Tayeb (2003) Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language 48:346–78.

R. Frost , A. Deutsch & K. I. Forster (2000a) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory, and Cognition 26:751–65.

R. Frost , A. Deutsch , O. Gilboa , M. Tannenbaum & W. Marslen-Wilson (2000b) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition 28:1277–88.

R. Frost & O. Yogev (2001) Orthographic and phonological computation in visual word recognition: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8:524–30.

P. Gomez , R. Ratcliff & M. Perea (2008) The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 115:577601.

U. Goswami (2000) Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia 6:133–51.

J. Grainger (2008) Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:135.

J. Grainger & L. Ferrand (1994) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language 33:218–33.

J. Grainger & C. Whitney (2004) Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:5859.

J. Grainger & J. Ziegler (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054. (Web journal, online publication).

N. Gronau & R. Frost (1997) Prelexical phonologic computation in a deep orthography: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4:107112.

C. Guerrera & K. I. Forster (2008) Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:117–42.

M. W. Harm & M. S. Seidenberg (1999) Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review 106:491528.

C. H. Hsu , J. L. Tsai , C. Y. Lee & O. J. Tzeng (2009) Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language 108:5666.

G. W. Humphreys , L. J. Evett & P. T. Quinlan (1990) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 22:517–60.

Z. R. Hunter & M. Brysbaert (2008) Theoretical analysis of interhemispheric transfer costs in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:165–82.

K. Inagaki , G. Hatano & T. Otake (2000) The effect of Kana literacy acquisition on the speech segmentation unit used by Japanese young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75:7091.

L. Katz & R. Frost (1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in Psychology, vol. 94, ed. R. Frost & L. Katz, pp. 6784. Elsevier/North-Holland.

B. Kessler & R. Treiman (1997) Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language 37:295311.

H. Kubozono (2006) The phonetic and phonological organization of speech in Japanese. In: The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, ed. M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka & Y. Shirai, pp. 191200. Cambridge University Press.

V. Kuperman , R. Bertram & R. H. Baayen (2008) Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:1089–132.

C. H. Lee & M. Taft (2009) Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4):530–42. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002.

C. H. Lee & M. Taft (2011) Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18(1):129–34. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y.

J. C. Marshall & F. Newcombe (1973) Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2:179–99.

I. G. Mattingly (1992) Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, ed. R. Frost & L. Katz, pp. 1126. Elsevier/North-Holland.

J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88:375407.

E. L. Newport & R. N. Aslin (2004) Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48:127–62.

D. Norris , S. Kinoshita & M. van Casteren (2010) A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language 62:254–71.

M. Perea , R. Abu Mallouh , & M. Carreiras (2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17(3):375–80.

M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006a) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59:1600–13.

M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006b) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology 53:308–15.

M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006c) Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13:418–22.

M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2008) Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes 23:6992.

M. Perea & S. J. Lupker (2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 51:231–46.

M. Perea & E. Perez (2009) Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:6788.

M. Perea & E. Rosa (2000a) Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7:668–77.

F. Peressotti & J. Grainger (1999) The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics 61:691706.

P. Perruchet & S. Pacton (2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:233–38.

S. T. Piantadosi , H. Tily & E. Gibson (2011) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:3526–29.

D. C. Plaut , J. L. McClelland , M. S. Seidenberg & K. Patterson (1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103:56115.

K. Rastle & M. H. Davis (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:942–71.

K. Rastle , M. H. Davis & B. New (2004) The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11:1090–98.

K. Rayner (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124:372422.

K. Rayner (2009) The thirty fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:1457–506.

K. Rayner , S. J. White , R. L. Johnson & S. P. Liversedge (2006) Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science 17:192–93.

D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 89:6094.

J. R. Saffran , R. N. Aslin & E. L. Newport (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28.

S. Schoonbaert & J. Grainger (2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 19:333–67.

M. S. Seidenberg & J. L. McClelland (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96:523–68.

P. H. K. Seymour , M. Aro & J. M. Erskine (2003) Foundation of literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94:143–74.

T. Shallice & E. K. Warrington (1977) The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 15:3141.

D. L. Share (2008a) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin 134(4):584615.

E. Shetreet & N. Friedmann (2011) Induced letter migrations between words and what they reveal about the orthographic-visual analyzer. Neuropsychologia 49:339–51.

R. Shillcock , T. M. Ellison & P. Monaghan (2000) Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review 107:824–51.

R. Treiman , J. Mullennix , R. Bijeljac-Babic & E. D. Richmond-Welty (1995) The special role of rimes in the description use and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124:107–36.

H. Velan & R. Frost (2007) Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14(5):913–18.

H. Velan & R. Frost (2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language 61:285320.

H. Velan & R. Frost (2011) Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition 118:141–56.

F. Wang , Y. Tsai & W. S.-Y. Wang (2009) Chinese literacy. In: Cambridge handbook on literacy, ed. D. Olson & N. Torrance, pp. 386417. Cambridge University Press.

C. Whitney (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8(2):221–43.

C. Whitney (2008) Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(6):824–65.

C. Whitney & P. Cornelissen (2005) Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 28(3):274301.

C. Whitney & P. Cornelissen (2008) SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(1):143–64. doi:10.1080/01690960701579771.

T. N. Wydell & T. Kondo (2003) Phonological deficit and the reliance on orthographic approximation for reading: A follow-up study on an English–Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 26:3348.

J. Yamada & A. Banks (1994) Evidence for and characteristics of dyslexia among Japanese children. Annals of Dyslexia 44:105–19.

J. C. Ziegler , D. Bertrand , D. Tóth , V. Csépe , A. Reis , L. Faísca , N. Saine , H. Lyytinen , A. Vaessen & L. Blomert (2010) Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science 21(4):551–59.

J. C. Ziegler & U. Goswami (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131:329.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score