Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Empirical evaluation of mental time travel

  • Caroline Raby (a1), Dean Alexis (a1), Anthony Dickinson (a1) and Nicola Clayton (a1)

Although the mental time travel (MTT) hypothesis provides a rich, conceptual framework, the absence of clear, empirically tractable, behavioural criteria for determining the capacity for MTT restricts its usefulness in comparative research. Examples of empirical criteria for evaluating MTT in animals are given. We also question the authors' evaluation of semantic foresight and their even-handedness in assessing human and nonhuman behaviour.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. S. Clayton , T. J. Bussey & A. Dickinson (2003) Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:685–91.

C. R. Raby , D. M. Alexis , A. Dickinson & N. S. Clayton (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445(7130):919–21.

S. J. Shettleworth (2007) Animal behaviour – Planning for breakfast. Nature 445(7130):825–26.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 73 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

This erratum applies to the following article(s)