Skip to main content
×
Home

Empirical evaluation of mental time travel

  • Caroline Raby (a1), Dean Alexis (a1), Anthony Dickinson (a1) and Nicola Clayton (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Although the mental time travel (MTT) hypothesis provides a rich, conceptual framework, the absence of clear, empirically tractable, behavioural criteria for determining the capacity for MTT restricts its usefulness in comparative research. Examples of empirical criteria for evaluating MTT in animals are given. We also question the authors' evaluation of semantic foresight and their even-handedness in assessing human and nonhuman behaviour.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Clayton N. S., Bussey T. J. & Dickinson A. (2003) Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:685–91.
Raby C. R., Alexis D. M., Dickinson A. & Clayton N. S. (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445(7130):919–21.
Shettleworth S. J. (2007) Animal behaviour – Planning for breakfast. Nature 445(7130):825–26.
Suddendorf T. & Corballis M. C. (1997) Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs 123(2):133–67. Available at: http://cogprints.org/725/
Tulving E. (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Organization of memory, ed. Tulving E. & Donaldson W., pp. 382403. Academic Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.