Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
CrossRef.
Zheng, Lijun
2019.
Facial masculinity preferences according to relationship status and sociosexual orientation in gay and bisexual men in China.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 138,
Issue. ,
p.
243.
Wagstaff, Danielle
2019.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
1.
O'Shea, Kieran J.
DeBruine, Lisa M.
and
Jones, Benedict C.
2019.
Further evidence for associations between short-term mating strategy and sexual disgust.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 138,
Issue. ,
p.
333.
Durante, Kristina M.
and
Griskevicius, Vladas
2018.
Evolution and consumer psychology.
Consumer Psychology Review,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
4.
Jünger, Julia
Kordsmeyer, Tobias L.
Gerlach, Tanja M.
and
Penke, Lars
2018.
Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 4,
p.
412.
Tybur, Joshua M.
2018.
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior.
p.
1.
March, Evita
Van Doorn, George
and
Grieve, Rachel
2018.
Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
Evolutionary Psychology,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
147470491881213.
Reynolds, Tania
Baumeister, Roy F.
and
Maner, Jon K.
2018.
Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol. 78,
Issue. ,
p.
195.
Sacco, Donald F.
and
Brown, Mitch
2018.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
1.
Howie, James Malcolm
and
Pomiankowski, Andrew
2018.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
1.
Millar, Murray
Westfall, R. Shane
and
Lovitt, Aileen
2018.
The influence of mate value on women's desire for long and short-term mates: Implicit responses.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 130,
Issue. ,
p.
36.
Muggleton, Naomi K.
and
Fincher, Corey L.
2018.
You're not my type: Do conservatives have a bias for seeing long-term mates?.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 6,
p.
652.
Schmitt, David P.
and
Buss, David M.
2018.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
1.
Albert, Graham
Pearson, Marlena
Arnocky, Steven
Wachowiak, Mark
Nicol, Jeffrey
and
Murphy, Dana R.
2018.
Effects of Masculinized and Feminized Male Voices on Men and Women’s Distractibility and Implicit Memory.
Journal of Individual Differences,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 3,
p.
151.
Rosenfield, Kevin A.
2018.
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior.
p.
1.
Neyer, Franz J.
Asendorpf, Jens B.
and
Asendorpf, Jens B.
2018.
Psychologie der Persönlichkeit.
p.
23.
Marzoli, Daniele
Havlíček, Jan
and
Roberts, S. Craig
2018.
Human mating strategies: from past causes to present consequences.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
e1456.
Jones, Benedict C.
Hahn, Amanda C.
and
DeBruine, Lisa M.
2018.
Ovulation, Sex Hormones, and Women’s Mating Psychology.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Flegr, Jaroslav
Blum, Amy E.
Nekola, Ondřej
and
Kroupa, Šebestián
2018.
What people prefer and what they think they prefer in short- and long-term partners. The effects of the phase of the menstrual cycle, hormonal contraception, pregnancy, and the marital and the parenthood status on partner preferences.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Bastardoz, Nicolas
and
Van Vugt, Mark
2018.
The nature of followership: Evolutionary analysis and review.
The Leadership Quarterly,