Skip to main content
×
Home

Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts

  • Michael J. Mahoney (a1)
Copyright
References
Hide All
Abelson P. H. (1980) Scientific communication. Science 209:6062. [aDVC]
Abramowitz S. I.Gomes B. & Abrarnowitz C. V. (1975) Publish or politic: Referee bias in manuscript review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 5:187200. [aDVC]
Abt H. A. (1988) What happens to rejected astronomical papers? Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 100:506–08. [aDVC]
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature (1987) A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine 106:598604. [SPL]
Adair R. K. (1981) Anonymous refereeing. Physics Today 34:1315. [aDVC]
Adair R. K. (1982) A physics editor comments on Peters & Ceci's peer-review study. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:196. [aDVC]
Adair R. K. & Trigg G. L. (1979) Editorial: Should the character of Physical Review Letters be changed? Physical Review Letters 43:1969–74. [aDVC]
Allen E. M. (1960) Why are research grant applications disapproved? Science 132:1532–34. [aDVC]
Amabile T. M. (1983) Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19:146–56. [RC]
American Psychological Association (1983) Publication manual, 3rd ed. [aDVC]
American Psychological Association (1985) Standards for educational and psychological testing. [RFB]
American Psychologist (1989) Members of underrepresented groups: Reviewers for journal manuscripts wanted. American Psychologist 44:1555. [RC]
Anonymous (1987) The publication game: Beyond quality in the search for a lengthy vitae. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 2:312 [RC]
Armstrong J. S. (1980) Unintelligible management research and academic prestige. Interfaces 10:8086. [aDVC]
Armstrong J. S. (1982a) Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:197–99. [aDVC]
Armstrong J. S. (1982b) The ombudsman: Is peer review by peers as fair as it appears? Interfaces 12:6274. [aDVC, JSA]
Armstrong J. S. (1982c) Research on scientific journals: Implications for editors and authors. Journal of Forecasting 1:83104. [aDVC, JSA]
Bailar J. C. III & Patterson K. (1985) Journal peer review: The need for a research agenda. The New England Journal of Medicine 312:654–57. [aDVC]
Baird J. C.Green D. M. and Luce R. D. (1980) Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6:277–89. [DL]
Bakanic V.McPhail C. & Simon R. J. (1987) The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Report 52:631–42. [aDVC, LJS]
Bartko J. J. (1966) The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports 19:311. [aDVC]
Bartko J. J. (1974) Corrective note to: “The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability.” Psychological Reports 34:418. [aDVC]
Bartko J. J. (1976) On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin 83:762–65. [aDVC]
Bartko J. J. & Carpenter W. T. (1976) On the methods and theory of reliability. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 163:307–17. [aDVC]
Beck A. T. (1976) Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press. [aDVC]
Benwell R. (1979) Authors anonymous? Physics Bulletin 30:288. [aDVC]
Berelson B. (1960) Graduate education in the United States. McGraw-Hill. [aDVC]
Bernstein G. S. (1984) Scientific rigor, scientific integrity: A comment on Sommer & Sommer. American Psychologist 39:1316. [aDVC]
Beyer J. M. (1978) Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. The Sociological Quarterly 19:6888. [aDVC]
Blashfield R. K. (1976) Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin 83:377–88. [rDVC]
Bloch D. A. & Kraemer H. C. (1989) 2X2 kappa coefficients: Measures of agreement or association. Biometrics 45:269–87. [HCK]
Boehme G. (1977) Models for the development of science. In: Science, technology, and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective, ed. Spiegel-Rosing I. & de Solla Price D.. Sage. [aDVC]
Boehme G.van der Daele W. & Krohn W. (1976) Finalization of science. Social Science Information 15:306–30. [aDVC]
Boor M. (1986) Suggestions to improve manuscripts submitted to professional journals. American Psychologist. 41:721–22. [RC]
Bornstein R. F. (1990) Manuscript review in psychology: An alternative model. American Psychologist 45:672–73. [RFB]
Bornstein R. F. (in press) Publication politics, experimenter bias, and the replication process in social science research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. [RFB].
Bowen D. D.Perloff R. & Jacoby J. (1972) Improving manuscript evaluation procedures. American Psychologist 25:221–25. [aDVC]
Bozarth H. D. & Roberts R. R. Jr. (1972) Signifying significant significance. American Psychologist 27:774–75. [aDVC]
Bradley J. V. (1981) Pernicious publication practices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18:3134. [aDVC]
Braida L. D. & Durlach N. T. (1972) Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51:483502. [DL]
Brennan R. L. & Light R. J. (1974) Measuring agreement when two observers classify people into categories not defined in advance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27:154–63. [rDVC]
Broad W. J. (1988) Science can't keep up with the flood of new journals. The New York Times, Feb. 16:C1, Cll. [JF]
Brook R. J. & Stirling W. D. (1984) Agreement between observers when the categories are not specified in advance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37:271–82. [rDVC]
Byrne C. (1980) Tutor marked assessments at the Open University: A question of reliability. Assessment in Higher Education 5:104–18. [DL]
Campbell J. P. (1982) Some remarks from the outgoing editor. Journal of Applied Psychology 67:691700. [LLH]
Carsrud K. B. (1984) Out of the frying pan: A reply to Sommer & Sommer. American Psychologist 31:1317–18. [aDVC]
Ceci S. J. & Peters D. (1984) How blind is blind review? American Psychologist 39:1491–94. [aDVC]
Chalmers I. (1990) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1405–08. [SPL]
Chalmers T. C.Frank C. S. & Reitman D. (1990) Minimizing the three stages of publication bias. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1392–95. [SPL]
Chase J. M. (1970) Normative criteria for scientific publication. American Sociologist 5:262–65. [aDVC]
Chubin D. E. (1982) Reform of peer review. Science 215:40. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. (1976) Assessing interrater reliability for rating scales: Resolving some basic issues. British Journal of Psychiatry 129:452–56. [aDVC].
Cicchetti D. V. (1980)Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data. American Psychologist 35:300–3. [aDVC, LJS]
Cicchetti D. V. (1980)Testing the normal approximation and minimal sample size requirements of weighted kappa when the number of categories is large. Applied Psychological Measurement 5:101–04. [arDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. (1980) On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:205. [arDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. (1985) A critique of Whitehurst's “Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews:” De omnibus, disputandum est. American Psychologist 40:563–68. [aDVC, MED]
Cicchetti D. V. (1988) When diagnostic agreement is high, but reliability is low: Some paradoxes occurring in independent neuropsychological assessments. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 10:605–22. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Conn H. O. (1976) A statistical analysis of reviewer agreement and bias in evaluating medical abstracts. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 45:373–83. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Conn H. O. (1978) Reviewer evaluation of manuscripts submitted to medical journals. Paper presented to the American Statistical Association Meetings, san Diego, CA. (also abstracted in Biometrics [1978] 34:728) [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Eron L. D. (1979) The reliability of manuscript reviewing for the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Social Statistics Section) 22:596600. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Feinstein A. R. (1990) High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43:551–68. [arDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Fleiss J. L. (1977) Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement 1:195201. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Heavens R. (1979) RATCAT (Rater Agreement/Categorical Data). American Statistician 33:91. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Showalter D. (1988) A computer program for determining the reliability of dimensionally scaled data when the numbers and specific sets of examiners may vary at each assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement 48:717–20. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Sparrow S. S. (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 86:127–37. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V. & Tyrer P. (1988) Reliability and validity of personality assessment. In: Personality disorders: Diagnosis, management and course, ed. Tyrer P. L.. Butterworth Scientific Ltd. [rDVC]
Cicchetti D. V.Aivano S. L. & Vitale J. (1976) A computer program for assessing the reliability and systematic bias of individual measurements. Educational and Psychological Measurement 36:761–64. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V.Aivano S. L. & Vitale J. (1977) Computer programs for assessing rater agreement and rater bias for qualitative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 37:195201. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V.Lee C.Fontana A. F. & Dowds B. N. (1978) A computer program for assessing specific category-rater agreement for qualitative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 38:805–13. [aDVC]
Cicchetti D. V.Sharma Y. & Cotlier E. (1982) Assessment of observer variability in the classification of human cataracts. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 55:8188. [rDVC]
Cicchetti D. V.Showalter D. & Tyrer P. (1985) The effect of number of rating-scale categories upon levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement 9:3136. [aDVC]
Cleary F. R. & Edwards D. J. (1960) The origins of the contributors to the A.E.R. during the fifties. American Economic Review 50:1011–14. [aDVC]
Cohen J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:3746. [aDVC, RR]
Cohen J. (1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70:213–20. [aDVC]
Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum. [rDVC, RR]
Cole J. & Cole S. (1973) Social stratification in science. University of Chicago Press. [aDVC]
Cole J. & Cole S. (1981) Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase U of a study. National Academy of Sciences. [aDVC]
Cole J. & Cole S. (1985) Experts' “consensus” and decision-making at the National Science Foundation. In: Selectivity in information systems: Survival of the fittest, ed. Warren K. S.. Praeger. [aDVC]
Cole S. (1978) Scientific reward systems: A comparative analysis. In: Research in sociology of knowledge, sciences, and art, ed. Jones R. A.. JAI Press. [aDVC]
Cole S. (1983) The hierarchy of the sciences. American Journal of Sociology 89:111–39. [aDVC], SC
Cole S.Cole J. & Simon G. A. (1981) Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214:881–86. [aDVC, SC, LLH]
Cole S.Cole J. & Dietrich L. (1978) Measuring the cognitive state of scientific disciplines. In: Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, ed. Elkana Y.Lederberg J.Merton R. K.Thackray A. & Zuckerman J.. Wiley. [SC]
Cole S.Rubin L. & Cole J. (1978) Peer review in the National Science Foundation. National Academy of Sciences. [aDVC]
Cole S.Simon G. & Cole J. (1988) Do journal rejection rates index scientific consensus? American Sociological Review 53:152–56. [SC]
Colman A. M. (1982a) Game theory and experimental games: The study of strategic interaction. Pergamon Press. [AMC]
Colman A. M. (1982b) Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:205–06. [AMC]
Conger A. J. (1980) Integration and generalization of Kappa for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin 88:322–28. [rDVC]
Conger A. J. (1985) Kappa reliabilities for continuous behaviors and events. Educational and Psychological Measurement 45:861–68. [rDVC]
Conn H. O. (1974) An experiment in blind program selection. Clinical Research 22:128–34. [aDVC]
Cotlier E.Fagadau W. & Cicchetti D. V. (1982) Methods for evaluation of medical therapy of senile and diabetic cataracts. Transactions of the Opthalmologic Societies of the United Kingdom 102:416–22. [rDVC]
Cox R. (1967) Examinations and higher education: A survey of the literature. Universities Quarterly 21:292340. [DL]
Grandall R. (1986) Peer review: Improving editorial procedures. Bio Science 36:607–09. [RC]
Grandall R. (1987a) Gauntlet thrown: Publication procedures are challenged. Dialogue (APA Division 8) 1:5. [RC]
Grandall R. (1987b) We need research on what constitutes good journal papers - and good editing - not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts! American Psychologist 42:407–08. [RC]
Grandall R. (1990) Improving editorial procedures. American Psychologist 45:665–66. [RC]
Crane D. (1967) The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist 32:195201. [aDVC]
Crane D. (1972) Invisible colleges. University of Chicago Press. [DLE]
Cronbach L. J. (1981) Comment on “Chance and consensus in peer review.” Science 214:1293. [LLH]
Culliton B. J. (1984) Fine-tuning peer review. Science 226:1401–02. [aDVC, RG]
Darley J. M. & Latane B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8:337–83. [AMC]
Darlington R. (1980) Another peek in the file drawers (unpublished manuscript). [PHS]
Davies M. & Fleiss J. L. (1982) Measuring agreement for multinomial data. Biometrics 38:1047–51. [rDVC]
DeBakey L. & DeBakey S. (1976) Impartial, signed reviews. New England Journal of Medicine 294:564. [aDVC]
Delucchi K. L. (1983) The use and misuse of chi-square: Lewis and Burke revisited. Psychological Bulletin 94:166–76. [rDVC]
Diamond J. (1985) Variations on a theme. Nature 314:222–23. [aDVC]
Dickersin K. (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1385–89. [SPL]
Doherty M. E. & Tweney R. D. (1988) The role of data and feedback error in inference and prediction. Final report for ARI Contract MDA903-85-K-0193. [MEG]
Eckberg D. (1982) Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:2526. [DLE]
Eells W. C. (1930) Reliability of reported grading of essay type examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology 21:4852. [DL]
Eichorn D. H. & VandenBos G. R. (1985) Dissemination of scientific and professional knowledge. American Psychologist 40:1301–16. [RFB]
Eight APA journals initiate controversial blind reviewing (1972) APA Monitor, pp. 1, 5. [aDVC]
Epstein W. M. (1990) Confirmatory response bias among social work journals. Science, Technology and Human Values 15:938. [rDVC, MJM]
Estes W. K. (1975) Some targets for mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12:263–82. [PHS]
Evans J. T.Nadjari H. I. & Burchell S. A. (1990) Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals: A continuing peer-review problem. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1353–54. [JSA].
Feinstein A. R. (1987) Clinimetrics. Yale University Press. [rDVC]
Feinstein A. R. & Cicchetti D. V. (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43:543–49. [arDVC]
Feynman R. P. (1985) Surely you are joking, Mr. Feynman. Bantam. [PHS]
Finn R. H. (1970) A note on estimating the reliability of categorical data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30:7176. [aDVC]
Fisher A. (1989) Seeing atoms. Popular Science: 102–07. [JSA]
Fiske D. W. & Fogg L. (1990) But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper!: Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. American Psychologist 45:591–98. [rDVC, JSA]
Fleiss J. L. (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76:378–82. [rDVC]
Fleiss J. L. (1975) Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics 31:651–59. [aDVC]
Fleiss J. L. (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. Wiley. [aDVC, RR]
Fleiss J. L. & Cicchetti D. V. (1978) Inference about weighted kappa in the non-null case. Applied Psychological Measurement 2:113–17. [rDVC]
Fleiss J. L. & Cohen J. (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:613–19. [aDVC]
Fleiss J. L. & Cuzick J. (1979) The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject. Applied Psychological Measurement 3:537–52. [rDVC]
Fleiss J. L.Cohen J. & Everitt B. S. (1969) Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin 72:323–37. [rDVC]
Fleiss J. L.Nee J. C. M. & Landis J. R. (1979) Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychological Bulletin 86:974–77. [rDVC]
Freeman C. & Tyrer P., eds. (1989) Research methodology in psychiatry: A beginners guide. Royal College of Psychiatrists/Gaskell Books. [PT]
Fuller S. (1989). Philosophy of science and its discontents. Westview Press. [MEG]
Furchtgott E. (1984) Replicate, again and again. American Psychologist 39:1315–16. [aDVC]
Garber H. L. (1984) On Sommer & Sommer. American Psychologist 31:1315. [aDVC]
Garcia C.Rosenfield N. S.Markowitz R. K.Seashore J. H.Touloukian R. J. & Cicchetti D. V. (1987) Appendicitis in children: Accuracy of the barium enema. American Journal of Diseases of Children 141:1309–12. [rDVC]
Gardner M. J.Snee M. P.Hall A. J.Powell C. A.Downes S. & Terrell J. D. (1990) Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. British Medical Journal 300:423–29. [SPL]
Garfield E. (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178:471–79. [RFB]
Garfunkel J. M.Ulshen R. H.Hamrick H. J. & Lawson E. E. (1990) Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1369–71. [rDVC, SPL]
Garner W. R. (1962) Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley. [DL]
Garner W. R. & McGill W. J. (1956) The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika 21:219–28. [arDVC], JBG
Garvey W. D.Lin N. & Nelson C. E. (1970) Some comparisons of communication activities in the physical and social sciences. In: Communication among scientists and engineers, ed. Nelson C. E. & Pollock D. K.. Health. [SC]
Garvey W. D.Lin N. & Nelson C. E. (1979) Communication in the physical and social sciences. In: Communication: The essence of science, ed. Garvey W. D.. Pergamon Press. [aDVC]
Gholson B. & Barker B. (1985) Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. American Psychologist 40:755–69. [aDVC]
Giere R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press. [MEG]
Gillett R. (1985) Nominal scale response agreement and rater uncertainty. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 38:5866. [rDVC]
Gilmore J. B. (1979) Illusory reliability in journal reviewing. Canadian Psychological Review 20:157–58. [arDVC, JBG]
Glenn N. D. (1976) The journal article review process: Some proposals for change. American Sociologist 11:179–85. [aDVC]
Goodman L. A. & Kruskal W. H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49:732–64. [aDVC]
Goodrich D. W. (1945) An analysis of manuscripts received by the editors of the American Sociological Review from May 1, 1944, to September 1, 1945. American Sociological Review1 10:716–25. [aDVC]
Goodstein L. D. (1982) When will the editors start to edit? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:212–13. [LJS]
Goodstein L. D. & Brazis K. L. (1970) Credibility of psychologists: An empirical study. Psychological Reports 27:835–38. [aDVC, JSA]
Gordon M. D. (1977) Evaluating the evaluators. New Scientist 73:342–43. [aDVC]
Gordon M. D. (1978) A study of the evaluation of papers by primary journals in the U.K. University of Leicester. [LLH]
Gorman M. E. (1986) How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology 77:6579. [MEG]
Gorman M. E. (1989) Error, falsification and scientific inference: An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 385412. [MEG]
Gorman Michael E. & Gorman Margaret E. (1984) A comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and a control strategy on Wason–s 2, 4, 6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12:129–40. [MEG]
Gottfredson S. D. (1978) Evaluating psychology research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. American Psychologist 33:920–34. [aDVC, RFB, JBG]
Green D. M.Luce R. D. & Duncan J. E. (1977) Variability and sequential effects in magnitude production and estimation of auditory intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 22:450–56. [DL]
Green D. M.Luce R. D. & Smith A. F. (1980) Individual magnitude estimates for various distributions of signal intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 27:483–88. [DL]
Greenwald A. G. (1975) Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 82:120. [aDVC, PHS]
Greenwald A. G. (1976) An editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33:17. [aDVC]
Greenwald A. G., Pratkanis A. R., Leippe M. R. & Baumgardner M. H. (1986) Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review 93:216–29. [aDVC]
Gross S. T. (1986) The kappa coefficient of agreement for multiple observers when the number of subjects is small. Biometrics 42:883–93. [rDVC].
Grove W. M., Andreasen N. C., McDonald-Scott P., Keller M. B. & Shapiro R. W. (1981) Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis: Theory and practice. Archives of General Psychiatry 38:408–13. [rDVC]
Guilford J. P. (1954) Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. [RR]
Gulliksen H. O. (1950) Theory of mental tests. Wiley. [DL, LJS]
Guyatt G. H., Townsend M. & Berman L. (1987) A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40:1129–33. [rDVC]
Hall J. A. (1979) Author review of reviewers. American Psychologist 34:798. [aDVC]
Hargens L. L. (1988) Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review 53:139–51. [aDVC, SC]
Hargens L. L. (1990) Variation in journal peer-review systems: Possible causes and consequences. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1348–52. [arDVC, LLH]
Hargens L. L. & Herting J. R. (1990a) A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts. Social Science Research 19:116. [arDVC, LLH]
Hargens L. L. & Herting J. R. (1990b) Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees. Scientometrics 19:91106. [aDVC, LLH]
Harnad S. (1979) Creative disagreement. The Sciences 19:1820. [aDVC]
Hamad S. ed. (1983) Peer commentary on peer review: A case study in scientific quality control. Cambridge University Press (reprinted from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 5). [aDVC].
Harnad S. (1985)Rational disagreement in peer review. Science, Technology &; Human Values 10(3):5562. [aDVC, LJS].
Harnad S. (1986)Policing the paper chase. Nature 322:2425. [aDVC, JBG].
Hartog P., Rhodes E. C., and Burt C. (1936) The marks of examiners. Macmillan. [DL]
Heavens R. H. Jr. & Cicchetti D. V. (1978) A computer program for calculating rater agreement and bias statistics using contingency table input. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Statistical Computing Section) 21:366–70. [aDVC]
Hendrick C. (1976) Editorial comment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2:27–08. [aDVC]
Hendrick C. (1977) Editorial comment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 3:12. [aDVC].
Hensler D. (1976) Perceptions of the National Science Foundation peer-review process: A report on a survey of NSF reviewers and applicants. NSF publication 77–33. [aDVC]
Heskin K. (1984) The Milwaukee Project: A cautionary comment. American Psychologist 39:1316–17. [aDVC]
Holt V. E. (1985) Research briefings: Peer-review appeals system established. American Psychological Association (APA) Monitor 16:18. [aDVC]
Horrobin D. F. (1990) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1438–41. [JSA]
Howe M. J. A. (1982) Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:218–19. [aDVC]
Hubbard R. & Armstrong J. S. (1990) Replication and the development of marketing science. Marketing Department working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. [JSA]
Hughes H. M. (1976) Letter to the editor. American Sociologist 11:178–79. [aDVC].
Hull D. L. (1988) Science as a process. University of Chicago Press. [LLH]
Hunt E. (1971) Psychological publications. American Psychologist 26:311. [aDVC]
Hunt K. (1975) Do we really need more replications? Psychological Reports 36:587–93. [aDVC]
Ingelfinger F. J. (1974) Peer review in biomedical publication. American Journal of Medicine 56:686–92. [aDVC]
Ingelfinger F. J. (1975) Charity and peer review in publication. New England Journal of Medicine 293:1371–72. [aDVC]
Ison J. R. (1985) The granting system and healthy research. Science 230:376. [aDVC]
Iyengar S. & Greenhouse J. B. (1988) Selection model and the file drawer hypothesis. Statistical Science 33:109–35. [PHS]
Jesteadt W., Luce R. D. & Green D. M. (1977) Sequential effects in judgment of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:92104. [DL]
Jesteadt W., Wier C. C. & Green D. M. (1977) Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61:169–77. [DL]
Jonckheere A. R. (1970) Techniques for ordered contingency tables. In: Proceedings of the NUFFIC International Summer Session in Science, Het Oude Hof ed. Riemersma J. B. & van der Meer H. C.. The Hague. [aDVC].
Jones R. (1974) Rights, wrongs, and referees. New Scientist 61:758–59. [aDVC]
Kahneman D., Slovic P. & Tversky A., eds. (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press. [HLR]
Kamin L. J. (1981) The intelligence controversy, ed. Eysenck H. J.. Wiley. [PHS]
Kazdin A. E. (1982) Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press. [aDVC]
Kerr S., Tolliver J. & Petree D. (1977) Manuscript characteristics which influence acceptance for management and social science journals. Academy of Management Journal 20:132–41. [aDVC]
Klayman J. & Ha Y.-W. (1987) Confirmation, discontinuation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review 94:211–28. [MEG]
Koran L. M. (1975a) The reliability of clinical methods, data, and judgments. New England Journal of Medicine 293:642–46. [rDVC]
Koran L. M. (1975b) The reliability of clinical methods, data, and judgments. New England Journal of Medicine 293:695701. [rDVC]
Koshland D. E. Jr. (1985) Peer review of peer review. Science 228:1387. [aDVC]
Kraemer H. C. (1980) Extension of the kappa coefficient. Biometrics 36:207–16. [rDVC]
Kraemer H. C. (1982) Estimating false alarms and missed events from interobserver agreement: Comment on Kaye. Psychological Bulletin 92:749–54. [rDVC]
Kraemer H. C. (1988) Assessment of 2x2 associations: Generalization or signal-detection methodology. The American Statistician 42:3749. [rDVC]
Kraus C. A. (1950) The present state of academic research. Chemical and Engineering News 28:3203–04. [aDVC]
Krippendorff K. (1970) Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability of data. In: Sociological methodology, ed. Borgatta E. G.. Jossey-Bass. [aDVC]
Krystal J., Giller E. & Cicchetti D. V. (1986) Assessment of alexithymia in post-traumatic stress disorder and psychosomatic illness: Introduction of a reliable measure. Psychosomatic Medicine 48:8494. [rDVC]
Kuhn T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. [aDVC, LDN]
Lakatos I. (1972) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Lakatos I. & Musgrave A.. Cambridge University Press. [aDVC]
Laming D. (1984) The relativity of “absolute” judgments. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37:152–83. [DL]
Laming D. (1990) The reliability of a certain university examination compared with the precision of absolute judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42A:239–54. [DL]
Laming D. (in press) Reconciling Fechner and Stevens? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. [DL]
Landis J. R. & Koch G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:1599–74. [rDVC]
Latane B., Williams K. & Harkins S. (1979) Many hands make light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:822–32. [AMC]
Laudan L. (1984) Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. University of California Press. [aDVC]
Lawlis G. F. & Lu E. (1972) Judgment of counseling process: Reliability, agreement, and error. Psychological Bulletin 78:1720. [aDVC]
Lazarus D. (1982) Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:219. [aDVC]
LeLewis D. & Burke C. J. (1949) The use and misuse of the chi square test. Psychological Bulletin 46:433–89. [rDVC]
Leach C. (1979) Introduction to statistics: A nonparametric approach for the social sciences. John Wiley. [aDVC]
Lindsey D. (1977) Participation and influence in publication review proceedings. American Psychologist 32:379–86. [RFB]
Lindsey D. (1978) The scientific publication system in social science. Jossey-Bass. [aDVC, RFB]
Lindsey D. (1988) Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll. Scientometrics 14:7582. [LLH]
Lock S. (1985) A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. ISI Press. [aDVC, JF]
Lodahl J. B. (1970) Paradigm development as a source of consensus in scientific fields (unpublished master's thesis). [aDVC]
Lord F. N. & Novick M. R. (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley. [LLH]
Luce R. D. (1989) A history of psychology in autobiography, vol. 8, ed. Lindzey G.. Stanford University Press. [PHS]
Luce R. D. & Green D. M. (1978) Two tests of a neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics 23:363–71. [DL].
Luce R. D., Nosofsky R. M., Green D. M. & Smith A. F. (1982) The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics 32:397408. [DL].
Machol R. (1981) Letter to the editor. The Sciences 21:xxi. [aDVC]
Maher B. A. (1978) A reader's, writer's, and reviewer's guide to assessing research reports in clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46:835–38. [aDVC]
Mahoney M. J. (1976) Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Ballinger. [LLH].
Mahoney M. J. (1977) Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy Research 1:161–75. [aDVC, LDN, PHS, SPL, JSA].
Mahoney M. J. (1978) Publish and perish. Human Behavior 7:3841. [aDVC].
Mahoney M. J. (1982) Publication, politics, and scientific progress. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:220–21. [AMC]
Mahoney M. J. (1985) Open exchange and epistemic progress. American Psychologist 40:2939. [ADVC, JBG, RFB, JF]
Mahoney M. J. (1987) Scientific publication and knowledge politics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 2:165–76. [RFB]
Mahoney M. J. (1990) Bias, controversy, and abuse in the study of the scientific publication system. Science, Technology, & Human Values 15:5055. [MJM]
Mahoney M. J., Kazdin A. E. & Kenigsberg M. (1978) Getting published. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2:6970. [aDVC]
Margulis L. (1977) Letter to the editor: Peer review attacked. The Sciences 17:5, 31. [aDVC]
Marsh H. W. & Ball S. (1981) Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology 73:872–80. [aDVC], HWM
Marsh H. W. & Ball S. (1989) The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: Interjudgmental reliability. Journal of Experimental Education 57:151–69. [HWM]
McCarthy P., Sharpe M. R., Spiesel S. Z., Dolan T. F., Forsyth B. W., DeWitt T. G., Fink H. D., Baron M. A. & Cicchetti D. V. (1982) Observation scales to identify serious illness in febrile children. Pediatrics 70:802–09. [rDVC]
McCarthy P. L., Sznajderman S. D., Lustman-Findling K., Baron M. A., Fink H. D., Czarkowski N., Bauchner H., Forsyth B. C. & Cicchetti D. V. (1990) Mothers' clinical judgment: A randomized trial of the acute illness observation scales. Journal of Pediatrics 116:200–06. [rDVC]
McCartney J. L. (1978) Making sense of reviewers' comments. Paper presented to the Southern Sociological Association Meetings, New Orleans, LA. [aDVC]
McNemar Q. (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12:153–57. [rDVC].
McNemar Q. (1955) Psychological statistics. Wiley. [GSW]
McNutt R. A., Evans A. T., Fletcher R. H. & Fletcher S. W. (1990) The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:137–76. [rDVC, JSA, SPL]
Merton R. K. (1973) The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press. [aDVC, DLE]
Meyer G. S. (1979) Academic labor and the development of science (unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Stony Brook. [SC]
Mezzich J. E., Kraemer H. C., Worthington D. R. L. & Coffman G. A. (1981) Assessment of agreement among several raters formulating multiple diagnoses. Journal of Psychiatric Research 16:2939. [rDVC]
Mitroff I. I. & Chubin D. E. (1979) Peer review at the NSF: A dialectical policy and analysis. Social Studies of Science 9:199232. Sage [aDVC]
Mulkay M. (1977) Sociology of the scientific research community. In: Science, technology, and society, ed. Spiegel-Rosing I. & de Solla Price D.. Sage. [aDVC]
Mulkay M. & William A. T. (1971) A sociological study of a physics department. British Journal of Sociology 22:6880. [SC]
Murphy R. J. L. (1978) Reliability of marking in eight GCE examinations. British Journal of Educational Psychology 48:196200. [DL]
Murphy R. J. L. (1982) A further report of investigations into the reliability of marking of GCE examinations. British Journal of Educational Psychology 52:5863. [DL]
National Research Council (1988) The behavioral and social sciences: Achievements and opportunities. National Academy Press. [MJM]
Nelson L., Satz P., Mitrushiea M., Van Gorp W., Cicchetti D., Lewis R. & Van Lancker D. (1989) Development and validation of the Neuropsychology Behavior and Affect Profile. Psychological Assessmen: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1:266–72. [rDVC]
Newman H., Freeman F. & Holzinger K. (1937) Twins. A study of heredity and environment. University of Chicago Press. [PHS].
Newman S. H. (1966) Improving the evaluation of submitted manuscripts. American Psychologist 21:980–81. [aDVC]
Nisbett R., & Ross L. (1980) Human inference: Strategies and shortcomingsin human judgments. Prentice-Hall. [HLR]
Nisbett R. E. & Wilson T. D. (1977) The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and socialPsychology 35:250–56.[RFB]
Noble J. H. (1974) Peer review: Quality control of applied social research. Science 185:916–21. [aDVC]
Nunnally J. C. (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. [aDVC]
Orlinsky D. & Howard K. (1978) The relation of process to outcome in psychotherapy. In: Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, ed. Garfield S. & Bergin A.. John Wiley & Sons. [LDN]
Orr R. H. & Kassab J. (1965) Peer group judgments on scientific merit: Editorial refereeing. Paper presented to the Congress of the International Federation of Documentation, Washington, D.C. [aDVC]
Over R. (1982) What is the source of bias in peer review?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:229–30. [aDVC]
Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H., Singer J., Goldsmith C. H., Hutchison B. G., Milner R. A. & Streiner D. L. (1991) Agreement among reviewers of review articles. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 44:9198. [rDVC]
Patterson E. H. (1969) Evaluation of manuscripts submitted for publication. American Psychologist 24:73. [aDVC]
Patterson K. & Bailar J. C. III (1985) A review of journal peer review. In: Selectivity in information systems: Survival of the fittest, ed. Warren K. S.. Praeger Scientific. [aDVC]
Peters C. (1976) Multiple submissions: Why not?. American Sociologist 11:165–79. [aDVC]
Peters D. P. & Ceci S. J. (1982) Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187255. [aDVC, AMC, DLE]
Pfeffer J., Leong A. & Strehl K. (1977) Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces 55:938–51. [aDVC]
Physical Review & Physical Review Letters (1987) Annual report 1986. [rDVC]
Pollack I. (1952) The information of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24:745–49. [DL]
Pollack I. (1953) The information of elementary auditory displays. II Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25:765–69. [DL]
Price D. de Solla (1963) Little science, big science. Columbia University Press. [aDVC]
Reid L. N., Soley L. C. & Wimmer R. D. (1981) Replications in advertising research: 1977, 1978, 1979. Journal of Advertising 10:313. [aDVC]
Relman A. S. (1978) Are journals really quality filters? Rockefeller Foundation working papers (conference, May 22–23). Coping with the biomedical literature explosion: A qualitative approach. [aDVC]
Remington M., Tyrer P. J., Newson-Smith J. & Cicchetti D. V. (1979) Comparative reliability of categorical and analogue rating scales in the assessment of psychiatric symptomatology. Psychological Medicine 9:765–70. [aDVC]
Rennie D. (1986) Guarding the guardians: A conference on editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 256:2391–92. [MJM]
Roberts W. A. (1976) Failure to replicate visual discrimination learning with a 1-min delay of reward. Learning and Motivation, 7, 313–25. [TRZ]
Robertson P. (1976) Towards open refereeing. New Scientist 71:410. [aDVC]
Robinson W. S. (1957) The statistical measurement of agreement. American Sociological Review 22:1725. [aDVC]
Rodman H. (1970) The moral responsibility of journal editors and referees. American Sociologist 5:351–57. [RC]
Roediger H. L. III (1987) The role of journal editors in the scientific process. In: Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment, ed. Jackson D. N. and Rushton J. P.. Sage. [LLH, HLR]
Rogot E. & Goldberg I. D. (1966) A proposed index for measuring agreement in test-retest studies. Journal of Chronic Diseases 19:9911006. [rDVC]
Romanczyk R. G., Kent R. N., Diament C. & O'Leary K. D. (1973) Measuring the reliability of observational data: A reactive process. Journal of Applied Analysis 6:175–84. [JDC]
Rosenfield N. S., Ablow R. C., Markowitz R. I., DiPietro M., Seashore J. H., Touloukian R. J. & Cicchetti D. V. (1984) Hirschsprung Disease: Accuracy of the barium enema examination. Radiology 150:393400. [rDVC]
Rosenthal R. (1979) The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results Psychological Bulletin 86:638–41. [PHS]
Rosenthal R. (1984) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage. [RR]
Rosenthal R. (1987) Judgment studies: Design, analysis, and meta-analysis. Cambridge University Press. [RR]
Rosenthal R. & Rosnow R. L. (1984) Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill. [RR]
Rosenthal R. & Rosnow R. L. (1985) Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press. [RR]
Rosenthal R. & Rubin D. B. (1978) Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:377415. [PHS]
Rosenthal R. & Rubin D. B. (1982) A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 74:166–69. [RR]
Rourke B. P. & Costa L. (1979) Editorial policy II. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1:9396. [aDVC]
Rowney J. A. & Zenisek T. J. (1980) Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions. Canadian Psychology 21:1721. [aDVC]
Roy R. (1985) Funding science: The real defects of peer review and an alternative to it. Science, Technology, and Human Values 10:7381. [aDVC]
Rubin D. B. (1982) Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:236–37. [PHS]
Scarr S. (1982) Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:237–38. [aDVC]
Scarr S. & Weber B. L. R. (1978) The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. American Psychologist 33:935. [aDVC, LJS]
Schönemann P. H. (1971) The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors. Psychometrika 36:2130. [PHS]
Schönemann P. H. (1989) New questions about old heritability estimates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27:175–78. [PHS]
Schönemann P. H. & Wang M. M. (1972) Some new results on factor indeterminancy. Psychometrika 37:6191. [PHS]
Scott W. A. (1974) Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist 29:698702. [aDVC, CAK]
Sharp D. W. (1990) What can and should be done to reduce publication bias?. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1390–91. [SPL]
Shrout P. E., Spitzer R. L. & Fleiss J. L. (1987) Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited. Archives of General Psychiatry 44:172–77. [rDVC]
Smart R. (1964) The importance of negative results in psychological research. Canadian Psychologist 5a:225–32. [aDVC]
Smigel E. O. & Ross H. L. (1970) Factors in the editorial decision. American Sociologist 5:1921. [aDVC]
Smith K. (1977) Letter to the editor: Peer review defended. The Sciences 17:5. [aDVC]
Snedecor G. W. & Cochran W. G. (1967) Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press. [RR]
Snedecor G. W. & Cochran W. G. (1980) Statistical methods, 7th ed. Iowa State University Press. [RR]
Solomon D. L. (1989) Editorial communication. Biometrics, June 21. [PHS]
Sommer R. & Sommer B. A. (1984) Reply from Sommer & Sommer. American Psychologist 39:1318–19. [aDVC]
Soper H. V., Cicchetti D. V., Satz P., Light R. & Orsini D. L. (1988) Null hypothesis disrespect in neuropsychology: Dangers of alpha and beta errors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 10:255–70. [aDVC]
Sparrow S. S., Balla D. A. & Cicchetti D. V. (1984a) The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: A revision of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale by E. A. Doll. I. Survey form. American Guidance Service. [rDVC]
Sparrow S. S., Balla D. A. & Cicchetti D. V. (1984b) The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: A revision of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale by E. A. Doll. II. Expanded form. American Guidance Service. [rDVC]
Sparrow S. S., Balla D. A. & Cicchetti D. V. (1985) The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: A revision of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale by E. A. Doll. III. Classroom edition. American Guidance Service. [rDVC]
Spearman K. (1927) The abilities of man. MacMillan. [PHS]
Spitzer R. L. & Fleiss J. L. (1974) A reanalysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 125:341–47. [aDVC]
Steiger J. J. & Schonemann P. H. (1976) A history of factor indeterminancy. In: Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences, ed. Shye S.. Jossey-Bass. [PHS]
Steinberg M., Rounsaville B. & Cicchetti D. V. (1990) Interview for DSM- III-R dissociative disorders: Preliminary report on a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry 147:7682. [rDVC]
Sterling T. D. (1959) Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance - or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association 54:3034. [aDVC]
Stevens J. C. & Tulving E. (1957) Estimations of loudness by a group of untrained observers. American Journal of Psychology 70:600–05. [DL]
Stevens S. S. (1971) Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review 78:426–50. [DL]
Stinchcombe A. L. & Ofshe R. (1969) On journal editing as a probabilistic process. American Sociologist 4:116–17. [rDVC, SC]
Stumpf W. E. (1980) Letters: “Peer” review. Science 207:822–23. [aDVC]
Summary Report of Journal Operations (1989) American Psychologist 44:1070. [aDVC]
Surwillo W. W. (1986) Anonymous reviewing and the peer review process. American Psychologist 41:218. [aDVC]
Thomas G. J. (1982) Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:240. [aDVC]
Thomas H. (1985) On the “file drawer” problem (unpublished manuscript). [PHS]
Tinsley H. E. A. & Weiss D. J. (1975) Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology 22:358–76. [LLH]
Torgerson W. S. (1958) Theory and methods of scaling. Wiley. [DL]
Tyrer P., Cicchetti D. V., Casey P. R., Fitzpatrick K., Oliver R., Baiter A., Ciller E. & Harkness L. (1984) Cross-national reliability study of a schedule for assessing personality disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 172:718–21. [rDVC]
Tyrer P., Owen R. & Cicchetti D. V. (1984) The Brief Scale for Anxiety: A subdivision of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 47:970–75. [rDVC]
Tyrer P., Strauss J. & Cicchetti D. V. (1983) Temporal reliability of personality in psychiatric patients. Psychological Medicine 13:393–98. [rDVC]
Uebersax J. S. (1981) GKAPPA: Generalized kappa coefficient. Applied Psychological Measurement 5:28. [rDVC]
Uebersax J. S. (1982) A generalized kappa coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement 42:181–83. [rDVC]
Uebersax J. S. (1989) Latent structure modeling of ordered category rating agreement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, UCLA, Los Angeles (A Rand Rand Corp. Note). [rDVC]
Ubersax J. & Grove W. (1989) Latent structure agreement analysis. Rand Corp. (A Rand Note). [rDVC]
Volkmar F. R., Cicchetti D. V., Dykens E., Sparrow S. S., Leckman J. F. & Cohen D. J. (1988) An evaluation of the Autism Behavior Checklist. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 18:8197. [rDVC]
Wason P. C. (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–40. [MEG]
Watkins M. W. (1979) Chance and interrater agreement on manuscripts. American Psychologist 34:796–97. [aDVC]
Whitehurst G. J. (1983) Interrater agreement for reviews for Developmental Review. Developmental Review 3:7378. [aDVC]
Whitehurst G. J. (1984) Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews. American Psychologist 39:2228. [aDVC, MED]
Wiener S. L., Urivetsky M., Bregman D., Cohen J., Eich R., Gootman N., Gulotta S., Taylor B., Tuttle R., Webb W. & Wright J. (1977) Peer review: Inter-reviewer agreement during evaluation of research grant applications. Clinical Research 25:306–11. [aDVC]
Wilson E. B. (1928) Review of “The Abilities of Man, Their Nature and Measurement,” by C. Spearman. Science 67:244–48. [PHS]
Wilson J. D. (1978) Peer review and publication. Journal of Clinical Investigation 61:16971701. [PT]
Wolff W. M. (1970) A study of criteria for journal manuscripts. American Psychologist 25:3639. [aDVC]
Wolff W. M. (1973) Publication problems in psychology and an explicit evaluation schema for manuscripts. American Psychologist 28:257–61. [aDVC]
Wright R. D. (1970) Truth and its keeper. New Scientist 45:402–04. [aDVC]
Wyer R. S., Greenwald A. G.Bernard H. R., Crandall R. & Anon. (1987) Comments on “The publication game.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 2:1322. [RC]
Yotopoulos P. A. (1961) Institutional affiliation of the contributors to three professional journals. American Economic Review 5:665–70. [aDVC]
Ziman J. (1968) Public knowledge: The social dimension of science. Cambridge University Press. [AMC]
Ziman J. (1976) The force of knowledge: The scientific dimension of society. Cambridge University Press. [AMC]
Zuckerman H. & Merton R. K. (1971) Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure, and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9:66100. [aDVC, LLH]
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.