Skip to main content
×
Home

Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases

  • Dario Maestripieri (a1), Andrea Henry (a1) and Nora Nickels (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In our response, we review and address the comments on our target article made in the 25 commentaries. First, we review and discuss the commentaries that recognized the value of our approach, accepted the main premises and conclusions of our target article, and suggested further avenues for research on attractiveness-related biases. We then respond to commentators who either misinterpreted some parts of our target article or made statements with which we disagree. These commentaries provided us with an opportunity to clarify some aspects of our target article, for example, the fact that we address both the functional significance of attractiveness-related biases and their underlying mechanisms. We provide a rebuttal to two commentaries, in which we are accused of poor scholarship. We conclude our response by addressing two commentaries that discussed the societal implications of the occurrence of attractiveness-related biases in the labor market by briefly discussing the relationship between scientific research and social policy.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Eagly H., Ashmore R. D., Makhijani M. G. & Longo L. C. (1991) What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110:109–28.
Feingold A. (1992a) Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin 111:304–41.
Hamermesh D. S. (2011) Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton University Press.
Hosoda M., Stone-Romero E. F. & Coats G. (2003) The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology 56:431–62.
Jackson L. A., Hunter J. & Hodge C. (1995) Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly 58:108–22.
Langlois J. H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A. J., Larson A., Hallam M. & Smoot M. (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126(3):390423.
Lemay E. P., Clark M. S. & Greenberg A. (2010) What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3):339–53.
Mazzella R. & Feingold A. (1994) The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24:1315–44.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 39 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 216 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 22nd March 2017 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.