Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 55
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jussim, Lee Crawford, Jarret T. Anglin, Stephanie M. Stevens, Sean T. and Duarte, Jose L. 2016. Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 66, p. 116.

    Bègue, Laurent Beauvois, Jean-Léon Courbet, Didier Oberlé, Dominique Lepage, Johan and Duke, Aaron A. 2015. Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm. Journal of Personality, Vol. 83, Issue. 3, p. 299.

    Boudry, Maarten Vlerick, Michael and McKay, Ryan 2015. Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality. Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 33, p. 524.

    Dvir-Gvirsman, S. 2015. Size Matters: The Effects of Political Orientation, Majority Status, and Majority Size on Misperceptions of Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 79, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Fruhen, Laura S. Watkins, Christopher D. and Jones, Benedict C. 2015. Perceptions of facial dominance, trustworthiness and attractiveness predict managerial pay awards in experimental tasks. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 1005.

    Funder, David C. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Guglielmo, Steve 2015. Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,

    Haselton, Martie G. Nettle, Daniel and Murray, Damian R. 2015. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.

    Johri, Aditya 2015. Impressions in action: the socially situated construction of expertise in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 44.

    Kenrick, Douglas T. Maner, Jon K. and Li, Norman P. 2015. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.

    Riege, Anine H. and Teigen, Karl Halvor 2015. Everybody Will Win, and All Must Be Hired: Comparing Additivity Neglect with the Nonselective Superiority Bias. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, p. n/a.

    Clark, Gordon L. 2014. Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography-Financial Literacy in Context. Economic Geography, Vol. 90, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Hahn, Ulrike and Harris, Adam J.L. 2014.

    MacGillivray, Brian H. 2014. Fast and frugal crisis management: An analysis of rule-based judgment and choice during water contamination events. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, Issue. 8, p. 1717.

    Peterson, Gregory R. 2014. ON McCAULEY'SWHY RELIGION IS NATURAL AND SCIENCE IS NOT: SOME FURTHER OBSERVATIONS. Zygon®, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 716.

    Spadaccini, Jonathan and Esteves, Jorge E. 2014. Intuition, analysis and reflection: An experimental study into the decision-making processes and thinking dispositions of osteopathy students. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 263.

    Wood, Timothy J. 2014. Is it time to move beyond errors in clinical reasoning and discuss accuracy?. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 403.

    Galperin, Andrew Fessler, Daniel M.T. Johnson, Kerri L. and Haselton, Martie G. 2013. Seeing storms behind the clouds: Biases in the attribution of anger. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 34, Issue. 5, p. 358.

    Krueger, Joachim I. Freestone, David and MacInnis, Mika L.M. 2013. Comparisons in research and reasoning: Toward an integrative theory of social induction. New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 73.

    Oakley, B. A. 2013. Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue. Supplement_2, p. 10408.


Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition

  • Joachim I. Krueger (a1) and David C. Funder (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2004

Mainstream social psychology focuses on how people characteristically violate norms of action through social misbehaviors such as conformity with false majority judgments, destructive obedience, and failures to help those in need. Likewise, they are seen to violate norms of reasoning through cognitive errors such as misuse of social information, self-enhancement, and an over-readiness to attribute dispositional characteristics. The causes of this negative research emphasis include the apparent informativeness of norm violation, the status of good behavior and judgment as unconfirmable null hypotheses, and the allure of counter-intuitive findings. The shortcomings of this orientation include frequently erroneous imputations of error, findings of mutually contradictory errors, incoherent interpretations of error, an inability to explain the sources of behavioral or cognitive achievement, and the inhibition of generalized theory. Possible remedies include increased attention to the complete range of behavior and judgmental accomplishment, analytic reforms emphasizing effect sizes and Bayesian inference, and a theoretical paradigm able to account for both the sources of accomplishment and of error. A more balanced social psychology would yield not only a more positive view of human nature, but also an improved understanding of the bases of good behavior and accurate judgment, coherent explanations of occasional lapses, and theoretically grounded suggestions for improvement.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *