Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:53:28.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why episodic memory may not be for communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2018

Felipe De Brigard  and
Bryce Gessell
Felipe De Brigard
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. felipe.debrigard@duke.edubryce.gessell@duke.eduwww.imclab.orgwww.emps.me/bryce Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Bryce Gessell
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. felipe.debrigard@duke.edubryce.gessell@duke.eduwww.imclab.orgwww.emps.me/bryce
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three serious challenges to Mahr & Csibra's (M&C's) proposal are presented. First, we argue that the epistemic attitude that they claim is unique to remembering also applies to some forms of imaginative simulations that aren't memories. Second, we argue that their account cannot accommodate critical neuropsychological evidence. Finally, we argue that their proposal looks unconvincing when compared to more parsimonious evolutionary accounts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corkin, S. (2013) Permanent present tense. The unforgettable life of the amnesic patient H.M. Basic Books.Google Scholar
De Brigard, F. (2014a) Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese 191(2):155–85. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-013-0247-7.Google Scholar
De Brigard, F., Addis, D., Ford, J. H., Schacter, D. L. & Giovanello, K. S. (2013) Remembering what could have happened: Neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking. Neuropsychologia 51(12):2401–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Brigard, F. & Giovanello, K. S. (2012) Influence of outcome valence in the subjective experience of episodic past, future and counterfactual thinking. Consciousness and Cognition 21(3):1085–96.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. (1982) Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2007) Philosophical knowledge and knowledge of counterfactuals. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74:89–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2016) Knowing by imagining. In: Knowledge through imagination, ed. Kind, A. & Kung, P., pp. 113–23. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar