Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Janowski, Konrad and Tatala, Małgorzata 2009. Short communications. Psychology of Language and Communication, Vol. 13, Issue. 2,


    Davis, Cameron Kleinman, Jonathan T. Newhart, Melissa Gingis, Leila Pawlak, Mikolaj and Hillis, Argye E. 2008. Speech and language functions that require a functioning Broca’s area. Brain and Language, Vol. 105, Issue. 1, p. 50.


    ×

Why the TDH fails to contribute to a neurology of syntax

  • Alan Beretta (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00242398
  • Published online: 01 February 2000
Abstract

An important part of Grodzinsky's claim regarding the neurology of syntax depends on agrammatic data partitioned by the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH), which is a combination of trace-deletion and default strategy. However, there is convincing evidence that the default strategy is consistently avoided by agrammatics. The TDH, therefore, is in no position to support claims about agrammatic data or the neurology of syntax.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×