Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?

  • MICHAEL SANDERS (a1), VEERLE SNIJDERS (a2) and MICHAEL HALLSWORTH (a3)
Abstract

The use of behavioural sciences in government has expanded and matured in the last decade. Since the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) has been part of this movement, we sketch out the history of the team and the current state of behavioural public policy, recognising that other works have already told this story in detail. We then set out two clusters of issues that have emerged from our work at BIT. The first cluster concerns current challenges facing behavioural public policy: the long-term effects of interventions; repeated exposure effects; problems with proxy measures; spillovers and general equilibrium effects and unintended consequences; cultural variation; ‘reverse impact’; and the replication crisis. The second cluster concerns opportunities: influencing the behaviour of government itself; scaling interventions; social diffusion; nudging organisations; and dealing with thorny problems. We conclude that the field will need to address these challenges and take these opportunities in order to realise the full potential of behavioural public policy.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Behavioural Insights Team, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London SW1H 9NP, UK. Email: michael.sanders@bi.team
References
Hide All
Abeler, J., Nosenzo, D. and Raymond, C. (2016), ‘Preferences for truth-telling’, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, University of Nottingham.
Akerlof, G. (1970), ‘The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3).
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000), ‘Economics and identity’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 715753.
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2005), ‘Identity and the economics of organizations’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1): 932.
Allcott, H. and Rogers, T. (2014), ‘The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation’, American Economic Review, 104(10): 3003–37.
Altmann, S., Armin, F., Jäger, S. and Zimmermann, F. (2015), ‘Learning about job search: A field experiment with job seekers in Germany’, IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
Ames, P. and Hiscox, M. (2016), Guide to developing behavioural interventions for randomised controlled trials: Nine guiding questions.
Arulampalam, W., Gregg, P. and Gregory, M. (2001), ‘Unemployment scarring’, The Economic Journal, 111(475): 577584.
Bason, C. (2010), Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society, Policy Press.
Behavioural Insights Team (2016), Update report: 2015–16. Available online http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/uncategorized/the-behavioural-insights-teams-update-report-2015-16/
Bond, R. and Smith, P. B. (1996), ‘Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task’, Psychological bulletin, 119(1): 111.
Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Luistro Jonsson, M. and Rahali, B. (2016), Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?
Bryan, C. J., Walton, G. M., Rogers, T. and Dweck, C. S. (2011), ‘Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(31): 1265312656.
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J. (2012), Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better, Oxford University Press.
Chande, R., Luca, M., Sanders, M., Soon, X., Borcan, O., Barak-Corren, N., Linos, E., Kirkman, E. and Robinson, S. (2017), Increasing attendance and attainment among adult students in the UK: Evidence from a field experiment.
Charness, G. and Gneezy, U. (2009), ‘Incentives to exercise’, Econometrica, 77(3): 909931.
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C. and Metrick, A. (2004), ‘For better or for worse: Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior’, University of Chicago Press: Perspectives on the Economics of Aging, 81–126.
Costa, E., King, K., Dutta, R., and Algate, F. (2016), Applying behavioural insights to regulated markets.
Croson, R. and Buchan, N. (1999), ‘Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games’, The American Economic Review, 89(2): 386391.
DellaVigna, S. (2009), ‘Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field’, Journal of Economic literature, 47(2): 315–72.
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D. and Vlaev, I. (2010), MINDSPACE: influencing behaviour for public policy.
Dolphin, T. and Nash, D. (Eds.), (2012), Complex New World: translating new economic thinking into public policy, Institute for Public Policy Research.
Dörner, D. (1996), Logic of Failure: Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do to Make Them Right, New York: Metropolitan Books.
Drago, F., Mengel, F., and Traxler, C. (2015), Compliance behavior in networks: Evidence from a field experiment.
Financial Conduct Authority (2013), Applying behavioural economics at the Financial Conduct Authority. Occasional Paper No.1.
Fisman, R. and Golden, M. (2017), ‘How to fight corruption’, Science, 356(6340): 803804.
Frey, E. and Rogers, T. (2014), ‘Persistence: How treatment effects persist after interventions stop’, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1): 172179.
Gandy, K., King, K., Streeter Hurle, P., Bustin, C. and Glazebrook, K. (2016), Poverty and decision-making: How behavioural science can improve opportunity in the UK.
Gottfried, M. A. (2010), ‘Evaluating the relationship between student attendance and achievement in urban elementary and middle schools: An instrumental variables approach’, American Educational Research Journal, 47(2): 434465.
Hallsworth, M., List, J., Metcalfe, R. and Vlaev, I. (2017), ‘The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance’, Journal of Public Economics, 148: 1431.
Hallsworth, M. and Sanders, M. (2016), ‘Nudge: Recent developments in behavioural science and public policy’, in Spotswood, F. (ed.), Beyond Behaviour Change: Key Issues, Inderdisciplinary Approaches, and Future Directions, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Hallsworth, M., Chadborn, T., Sallis, A., Sanders, M., Berry, D., Greaves, F. and Davies, S. C. (2016), ‘Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: A pragmatic national randomised controlled trial’, The Lancet, 387(10029): 17431752.
Halpern, D. (2015), Inside the Nudge Unit: How small changes can make a big difference, Random House.
Halpern, D. (2016), It's time to bring more realistic models of human behaviour into economic policy and regulation, Bank Underground.
Hansen, P. G. and Jespersen, A. M. (2013), ‘Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1): 328.
Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A. H. S., Dellinger, E. P., … and Merry, A. F. (2009), ‘A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population’, New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5): 491499.
Haynes, L. C., Green, D. P., Gallagher, R., John, P. and Torgerson, D. J. (2013), ‘Collection of delinquent fines: An adaptive randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of alternative text messages’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4): 718730.
Haynes, L., Goldacre, B. and Torgerson, D. (2012), Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. Cabinet Office.
Heine, S. J. (2008), Cultural Psychology, New York: W. W. Norton.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. and Norenzayan, A. (2010), ‘Most people are not WEIRD’, Nature, 466(7302): 29.
Huck, S. and Rasul, I. (2011), ‘Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment’, Journal of Public Economics, 95(5): 351362.
Institute for Government and Cabinet Office (2010), MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy.
John, P., Sanders, M. and Wang, J. (2014), The use of descriptive norms in public administration: A panacea for improving citizen behaviours?
Kettle, S., Hernandez, M., Sanders, M., Hauser, O. and Ruda, S. (2017), Failure to CAPTCHA attention: Null results from an honesty priming experiment in Guatemala.
Kettle, S., Hernandez, M., Ruda, S. and Sanders, M.A. (2016), ‘Behavioral interventions in tax compliance: Evidence from Guatemala’.
Khan, U. and Dhar, R. (2006), ‘Licensing Effect In Consumer Choice’, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2): 259266.
Kim, D. A., Hwong, A. R., Stafford, D., Hughes, D. A., O'Malley, A. J., Fowler, J. H. and Christakis, N. A. (2015), ‘Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial’, The Lancet, 386(9989): 145153.
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B. Jr, Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., … and Cemalcilar, Z. (2014), ‘Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project’, Social psychology, 45(3): 142.
Kraft, M. A. and Rogers, T. (2015), ‘The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment’, Economics of Education Review, 47: 4963.
Larcom, S., Rauch, F. and Willems, T. (2017), ‘The benefits of forced experimentation: Striking evidence from the London underground network’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4): 20192055.
Leape, J. (2006), ‘The London congestion charge’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4): 157176.
Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2016), ‘The rationality paradox of nudge: Rational tools of government in a world of bounded rationality’, Law & Policy, 38(3): 250267.
Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D. and Rajpal, S. (2015), ‘Warning: You are about to be nudged’, Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1): 3542.
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1976), ‘Econometric policy evaluation: A Critique’, In Brunner, K. and Meltzer, A. H. (eds.), The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Volume 1, Journal of Monetary Economics, Supplement, 1946.
Merritt, A.C., Effron, D. A., and Monin, B. (2010), ‘Moral self-licensing: when being good frees us to be bad’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5): 344357.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. and Rodriguez, M. L. (1989), ‘Delay of gratification in children’, Science, 244(4907): 933.
Mortensen, D. T. and Pissarides, C. A. (1999), ‘New developments in models of search in the labor market’, Handbook of Labor Economics, 3: 25672627.
OECD (2017), Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Available online http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights-and-public-policy-9789264270480-en.htm
Oliver, A. (2013), ‘From nudging to budging: Using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 42(4): 685700.
Oliver, A. (2015), ‘Nudging, shoving, and budging: Behavioural economic-informed policy’, Public Administration, 93(3): 700714.
Ormerod, P. (2010), N Squared: Public policy and the power of networks. RSA Pamphlet.
Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R. and Wykes, M. C. (2014), ‘Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review’, Research Evaluation, 23(1): 2132.
Pykett, J., Jones, R. and Whitehead, M. (eds.) (2017), ‘Psychological governance and public policy: Governing the mind, brain and behaviour’, Oxford: Routledge.
Roberto, C. A., Larsen, P. D., Agnew, H., Baik, J. and Brownell, K.D. (2010), ‘Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake’, American Journal of Public Health, 100(2): 312318.
Sacerdote, B. (2001), ‘Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2): 681704.
Sanders, M. (2015), In search of the limits of applying reciprocity in the field: Evidence from two large field experiments.
Sanders, M. and Halpern, D. (2016), ‘Nudging by government: Progress, impact, and lessons learned’, Behavioral Science and Policy, 2(2): 5265.
Sanders, M. and Kirkman, E. (2014), ‘I've booked you a place. Good luck: A field experiment applying behavioural science to improve attendance at high-impact recruitment events’, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation Working Paper Series, 14: 334.
Shafir, E. (ed.), (2013), The behavioral foundations of public policy, Princeton University Press.
Simon, H. (1947), Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Macmillan.
Social and Behavioural Science Team (SBST) (2015), Annual report. Available online https://sbst.gov/download/2015%20SBST%20Annual%20Report.pdf
Social and Behavioural Science Team (SBST) (2016), Annual report. Available online https://sbst.gov/download/2016%20SBST%20Annual%20Report.pdf
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M. and Quinn, D. M. (1999), ‘Stereotype threat and women's math performance’, Journal of experimental social psychology, 35(1): 428.
Steele, C. M and Aronson, J. (1995), ‘Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797.
Sunstein, C. R. (2011), ‘Empirically informed regulation’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 78(4): 13491429.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014), Simpler: The Future of Government, Simon and Schuster.
Thaler, R. (2015), The Making of Behavioral Economics: Misbehaving, New York.
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Urbach, D. R., Govindarajan, A., Saskin, R., Wilton, A. S. and Baxter, N. N. (2014), ‘Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada’, New England Journal of Medicine, 370(11): 10291038.
Van Klei, W. A., Hoff, R. G., Van Aarnhem, E. E. H. L., Simmermacher, R. K. J., Regli, L. P. E., Kappen, T. H., … and Peelen, L. M. (2012), ‘Effects of the introduction of the WHO “Surgical Safety Checklist” on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study’, Annals of Surgery, 255(1): 4449.
Waldron, J. (2014), ‘It's All for Your Own Good’, New York Review of Books.
Walker, T. (2007), ‘Why economists dislike a lump of labor’, Review of Social Economy, 65(3): 279291.
Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Howell, R., Lilley, R. and Pykett, J. (2014), Nudging All Over the World: Assessing the Global Impact of the Behavioural Sciences on Public Policy. Economic Social & Research Council Report. Swindon, UK.
World Bank Group (2015), Mind, Society, and Behavior. World Development Report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Yavaş, M. and Yücel, G. (2014), ‘Impact of homophily on diffusion dynamics over social networks’, Social Science Computer Review, 32(3): 354372.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioural Public Policy
  • ISSN: 2398-063X
  • EISSN: 2398-0648
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioural-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed