Skip to main content Accessibility help




Insights from the behavioural sciences are increasingly used by governments and other organizations worldwide to ‘nudge’ people to make better decisions. Furthermore, a large philosophical literature has emerged on the ethical considerations on nudging human behaviour that has presented key challenges for the area, but is regularly omitted from discussion of policy design and administration. We present and discuss FORGOOD, an ethics framework that synthesizes the debate on the ethics of nudging in a memorable mnemonic. It suggests that nudgers should consider seven core ethical dimensions: Fairness, Openness, Respect, Goals, Opinions, Options and Delegation. The framework is designed to capture the key considerations in the philosophical debate about nudging human behaviour, while also being accessible for use in a range of public policy settings, as well as training.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nudge FORGOOD
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nudge FORGOOD
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nudge FORGOOD
      Available formats


Corresponding author

*Correspondence to: University College Dublin, School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email:


Hide All
Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015), Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Alemanno, A., & Sibony, A.-L. (2015), Nudge and the Law: A European Perspective, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Alemanno, A., & Spina, A. (2014), ‘Nudging legally: on the checks and balances of behavioral regulation’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12, 429456.
Bar-Gill, O. (2019), ‘Symposium: algorithmic price discrimination when demand is a function of both preferences and (mis)perceptions’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 86, 217254.
Barton, A., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2015), ‘From libertarian paternalism to nudging—and beyond’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 341359.
Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., … Galing, S. (2017), ‘Should governments invest more in nudging?’, Psychological Science, 28, 10411055.
Bernheim, B. D. (2016), ‘The good, the bad, and the ugly: a unified approach to behavioral welfare economics’, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7, 1268.
Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2008), ‘How are preferences revealed?’, Journal of Public Economics, 92, 17871794.
Binder, M. (2014), ‘Should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism?’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 515539.
Binder, M., & Lades, L. K. (2015), ‘Autonomy-enhancing paternalism’, Kyklos, 68, 327.
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Burroughs, H. (2012), ‘Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the “nudge”’, The American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 110.
Bovens, L. (2009), ‘The ethics of nudge’, In Preference Change, Berlin: Springer, 207219.
Bovens, L. (2013), ‘Why couldn't I be nudged to dislike a Big Mac?’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 495496.
Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L., & Rahali, B. (2018), ‘Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 4159.
Bubb, R., & Pildes, R. H. (2014), ‘How behavioral economics trims its sails and why’, Harvard Law Review, 127, 1329.
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003), ‘Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 12111254.
Clavien, C. (2018), ‘Ethics of nudges: a general framework with a focus on shared preference justifications’, Journal of Moral Education, 47, 366382.
Conly, S. (2012), Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018), ‘Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials’, Social Science & Medicine, 210, 221.
Dolan, P., King, D., Halpern, D., Hallsworth, M., & Vlaev, I. (2010), MINDSPACE. The Institute for Government. Retrieved from:
Fabbri, M., & Faure, M. (2018), ‘Toward a “constitution” for behavioral policy-making’, International Review of Economics, 65, 130.
Felsen, G., Castelo, N., & Reiner, P. B. (2013), ‘Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges’, Judgment & Decision Making, 8, 202213.
Glaeser, E. L. (2006), ‘Paternalism and psychology’, University Of Chicago Law Review, 73, 133156.
Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012), ‘Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles’, Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 635645.
Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2015), ‘Why behavioural policy needs mechanistic evidence’, Economics and Philosophy, 32, 121.
Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016), ‘Nudge versus boost: how coherent are policy and theory?’, Minds and Machines, 26, 149183.
Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015), ‘Public views on policies involving nudges’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 439453.
Hagmann, D., Ho, E.H. & Loewenstein, G. (2019), ‘Nudging out support for a carbon tax’, Nature Climate Change, 9, 484489.
Hansen, P. G. (2016), ‘The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: does the hand fit the glove?’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7, 155174.
Hansen, P. G. (2019), The BASIC Toolkit: Tools and Ethics for Applied Behavioural Insights, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooporation and Development (OECD).
Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013), ‘Nudge and the manipulation of choice: a framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4, 328.
Hausman, D. M. (2012), Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010), ‘Debate: to nudge or not to nudge*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 123136.
Heidhues, P., & Kőszegi, B. (2017), ‘Naïveté-based discrimination’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132, 10191054.
Hertwig, R. (2017), ‘When to consider boosting: some rules for policy-makers’, Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 143161.
Jachimowicz, J., Matz, S., & Polonski, V. (2017), The Behavioral Scientist's Ethics Checklist. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from The Behavioral Scientist's Ethics Checklist website. Retrieved from:
Jung, J. Y., & Mellers, B. A. (2016), ‘American attitudes toward nudges’, Judgment & Decision Making, 11.
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Klein, G. (2007), ‘Performing a project premortem’, Harvard Business Review, 85, 1819.
Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015), ‘Warning: you are about to be nudged’, Behavioral Science & Policy, 1, 3542.
Loewenstein, G., & Chater, N. (2017), ‘Putting nudges in perspective’, Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 2653.
Mittelstadt, B. D., & Floridi, L. (2016), ‘The ethics of Big Data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 303341.
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013), Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much, New York: Macmillan.
Noggle, R. (2018), ‘Manipulation, salience, and nudges’, Bioethics, 32, 164170.
Nys, T. R., & Engelen, B. (2017), ‘Judging nudging: answering the manipulation objection’, Political Studies, 65, 199214.
Oliver, A. (2013), ‘From nudging to budging: using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 685700.
Oliver, A. (2019), ‘Towards a New Political Economy of Behavioral Public Policy’, Public Administration Review. Retrieved from:
Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2019), ‘Transparency effects on policy compliance: disclosing how defaults work can enhance their effectiveness’, Behavioural Public Policy, 3, 122.
Rawls, J. (2009), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Read, D. (2006), ‘Which side are you on? The ethics of self-command’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 681693.
Rebonato, R. (2012), Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rebonato, R. (2014), ‘A critical assessment of libertarian paternalism’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 357396.
Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, D. G. (2009), ‘The knowledge problem of new paternalism’, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2009, 905968.
Saghai, Y. (2013), ‘Salvaging the concept of nudge’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 487493.
Schubert, C. (2017), ‘Green nudges: do they work? Are they ethical?’, Ecological Economics, 132, 329342.
Sugden, R. (2008), ‘Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism’, Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 226248.
Sugden, R. (2017), ‘Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles?’, International Review of Economics, 64, 113123.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014), Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2015), ‘The ethics of nudging’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 32, 413.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016a), ‘People prefer system 2 nudges (kind of)’, Duke Law Journal, 66, 121.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016b), The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018a), ‘“Better off, as judged by themselves”: a comment on evaluating nudges’, International Review of Economics, 65, 18.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018b), ‘Misconceptions about nudges’, Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2, 6167.
Sunstein, C. R. (2019), On Freedom, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2020), ‘Sludge audits’, Behavioural Public Policy, 120. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2019.32.
Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2019), Trusting Nudges: Toward a Bill of Rights for Nudging, Abingdon: Routledge.
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003), ‘Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 11591202.
Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2018), ‘A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost’, Regulation & Governance, 12, 322.
Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R., & Rogers, T. (2017), ‘On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions’, Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0130.
Thaler, R. H. (2015), The Power of Nudges, for Good and Bad. The New York Times. Retrieved from:
Thaler, R. H. (2018), ‘Nudge, not sludge’, Science, 361, 431431.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
The Behavioural Insights Team (2014), EAST: Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights. Retrieved from:
Vugts, A., Hoven, M. V. D., Vet, E. D., & Verweij, M. (2018), ‘How autonomy is understood in discussions on the ethics of nudging’, Behavioural Public Policy, 116.
Waldron, J. (2014), It's All for Your Own Good. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from:
White, M. (2013), The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Berlin: Springer.




Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed