Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:39:22.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is sludge? Comparing Sunstein's definition to others'

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2022

Philip W. S. Newall Open the ORCID record for Philip W. S. Newall [Opens in a new window]
Philip W. S. Newall*
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, United Kingdom
*
E-mail: pnewall561@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review Essay
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 851 - 857
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Gill, O. (2012), Seduction by contract: Law, economics, and psychology in consumer markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team (2014), EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Retrieved from: https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team (2021), Applying behavioural insights to design safer gambling tools. Part 1: Anchoring. Retrieved from: https://www.bi.team/publications/applying-behavioural-insights-to-design-safer-gambling-tools/Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2003), ‘Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3): 1211–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R. and Vlaev, I. (2012), ‘Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1): 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X. and Laibson, D. (2006), ‘Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 505–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, C. M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J. and Toombs, A. L. (2018), ‘The dark (patterns) side of UX design’, in Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadi Mogavi, R., Guo, B., Zhang, Y., Haq, E., Hui, P. and Ma, X. 2022), ‘When gamification spoils your learning: A qualitative case study of gamification misuse in a language-learning app’, in Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. doi:10.1145/3491140.3528274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidhues, P., Kőszegi, B. and Murooka, T. (2016), ‘Inferior products and profitable deception’, The Review of Economic Studies, 84(1): 323–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. J. and Goldstein, D. G. (2003), ‘Do defaults save lives?’ Science, 302: 1338–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lades, L. K. and Delaney, L. (2022), ‘Nudge FORGOOD’, Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1): 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J. and Rockloff, M. (2016), ‘Understanding gambling related harm: A proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms’, BMC Public Health, 16(1): 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, J. and Hamari, J. (2022), ‘Gamblification: A definition’, New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/14614448221083903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. (2020), ‘Nudge/sludge symmetry: On the relationship between nudge and sludge and the resulting ontological, normative and transparency implications’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.61.Google Scholar
Mrkva, K., Posner, N. A., Reeck, C. and Johnson, E. J. (2021), ‘Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge’, Journal of Marketing, 85(4): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muggleton, N., Parpart, P., Newall, P., Leake, D., Gathergood, J. and Stewart, N. (2021), ‘The association between gambling and financial, social, and health outcomes in big financial data’, Nature Human Behaviour, 5: 319–326. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01045-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newall, P. W. S. (2019), ‘Dark nudges in gambling’, Addiction Research & Theory, 27(2): 65–67. doi:10.1080/16066359.2018.1474206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newall, P. W. S. and Rockloff, M. J. (2021), ‘Promoting safer gambling via the removal of harmful sludge: A view on how behavioral science's “nudge” concept relates to online gambling’, Addiction. doi:10.1111/ADD.15700.Google ScholarPubMed
Newall, P. W. S., Walasek, L., Ludvig, E. A. and Rockloff, M. J. (2022), ‘Nudge versus sludge in gambling warning labels: How the effectiveness of a consumer protection measure can be undermined’, Behavioral Science & Policy.Google Scholar
Page, L. (2019), ‘Disclosure for real humans’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.23.Google Scholar
Pennay, A., Livingston, M., Cook, M., Room, R., Dwyer, R., MacLean, S. and Kuntsche, E. (2020), ‘Sports bars: Environmental design, drinking, and sports betting’, Addiction Research & Theory, 29(4): 316–326. doi:10.1080/16066359.2020.1830071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petticrew, M., Maani, N., Pettigrew, L., Rutter, H. and Van Schalkwyk, M. C. (2020), ‘Dark nudges and sludge in big alcohol: Behavioral economics, cognitive biases, and alcohol industry corporate social responsibility’, The Milbank Quarterly, 98(4): 1290–1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, M., Snijders, V. and Hallsworth, M. (2018), ‘Behavioural science and policy: Where are we now and where are we going?’ Behavioural Public Policy, 2(2): 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahab, S. and Lades, L. K. (2021), ‘Sludge and transaction costs’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soman, D., Cowen, D., Kannan, N. and Feng, B. (2019), Seeing sludge: Towards a dashboard to help organizations recognize impedance to end-user decisions and action. Toronto, Canada: Behavioural Economics in Action at Rotman (BEAR) Report Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2018), ‘Sludge and ordeals’, Duke Law Journal, 68: 1843–1883.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2020), ‘Sludge audits’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2021), Sludge: What stops us from getting things done and what to do about it. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. and Gosset, J. L. (2020), ‘Optimal sludge? The price of program integrity’, Duke Law Journal Online, 70.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (2018), ‘Nudge, not sludge’, Science, 361(6401): 431. doi:10.1126/science.aau9241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Shefrin, H. M. (1981), ‘An economic theory of self-control’, Journal of Political Economy, 89(2): 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2021), Nudge: The final edition. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science, 185(4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, L. Y., Henderson, L. L., Yang, Y. and Newall, P. W. S. (2021), ‘Gaming the system: Sub-optimal compliance with loot box probability disclosure regulations in China’, Behavioural Public Policy. doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar