Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-5zjcf Total loading time: 0.307 Render date: 2022-08-10T03:13:55.790Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

SUJIN YANG
Affiliation:
Tyndale University College
HWAJIN YANG
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
BARBARA LUST*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
*
Address for correspondence: Barbara Lust, Department of Human Development, Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USABCL4@cornell.edu

Abstract

This study investigated whether early especially efficient utilization of executive functioning in young bilinguals would transcend potential cultural benefits. To dissociate potential cultural effects from bilingualism, four-year-old U.S. Korean–English bilingual children were compared to three monolingual groups – English and Korean monolinguals in the U.S.A. and another Korean monolingual group, in Korea. Overall, bilinguals were most accurate and fastest among all groups. The bilingual advantage was stronger than that of culture in the speed of attention processing, inverse processing efficiency independent of possible speed-accuracy trade-offs, and the network of executive control for conflict resolution. A culture advantage favoring Korean monolinguals from Korea was found in accuracy but at the cost of longer response times.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by research grant awards from the College of Human Ecology and the Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies at Cornell University. We thank M. Rosario Rueda and Jin Fan for consultation on the Attention Network Test and to Ellen Bialystok, Suzanne Flynn, James Gair, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. Many thanks also go to the directors of daycare centers (NEW Christian Academy in New Jersey, Cornell University Early Childhood Center under the direction of Elizabeth Stilwell in New York, and Good Morning daycare in Korea) for their support, as well as parents and children who willingly participated in the study.

References

Ahadi, S. A., Rothbart, M. K., & Ye, R. (1993). Children's temperament in the US and China similarities and differences. European Journal of Personality, 7, 359377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2009). Claiming evidence from non-evidence: A reply to Morton and Harper. Developmental Science, 12, 499501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. (2010). Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46, 93105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and aging, 19, 290303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & DePape, A. M. (2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 565574.Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (4), 525531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S. M. (2009). Social origins of executive function development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 123, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Choi, H. P. (2008, July). Bilingualism and cultural influences on the development of executive function. Presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Würzburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In Bornstein, M. H. (series ed.), Handbook of parenting (vol. 4): Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd edn.), pp. 5993. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Hastings, P. D., Rubin, K. H., Chen, H., Cen, G., & Stewart, S. L. (1998). Child-rearing attitudes and behavioral inhibition in Chinese and Canadian toddlers: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 34, 677686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 5986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fantuzzo, J., McWayne, C., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33, 467480.Google Scholar
Farver, J. M., & Lee-Shin, Y. (2000). Acculturation and Korean–American children's social and play behavior. Social Development, 9, 316336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. (1989). The role of the head-initial/head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers. In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 89108. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-II. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kovács, A. M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. PNAS, 106, 65566560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFramboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Y., Smith, J., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). Word reading and reading-related skills in adolescents with Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 576587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C., Koyasu, M., Oh, S., Ogawa, A., Short, B., & Huang, Z. (2009). Culture, executive function, and social understanding. In Kewis, C. & Carpendale, J. I. M. (eds.), Social interaction and the development of executive function: Special issue of New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 123, 69–85.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2004). Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 51 (2), 190201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75, 13731386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 4048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Education. (2001). Education in Korea. Seoul: Ministry of Education.Google ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. P., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, S., & Lewis, C. (2008). Korean preschoolers’ advanced inhibitory control and its relation to other executive skills and mental state understanding. Child Development, 79, 8099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Fan, J. (2008). Attention as an organ system. In Pomerantz, J. R. (ed.), Topics in integrative neuroscience, pp. 3161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Rachle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Rueda, M. R. (2008). Brain mechanisms and learning high level skills. In Battro, A. M., Fisher, K. W., & Léna, P. F. (eds.), The educated brain, pp. 151165. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 10291040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 7480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In Castellan, N. J. & Restle, F. (eds.), Cognitive theory (vol. 3), pp. 199239. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture and anthropology. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Vinden, P. G. (2001). Parenting attitudes and children's understanding of mind: A comparison of Korean American and Anglo-American families. Cognitive Development, 16, 793809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q. (2006). Relations to maternal style and child self-concept to autobiographical memories in Chinese, Chinese immigrant and European American 3-year-olds. Child Development, 77, 17641809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S., Blumé, M., & Lust, B. (eds.) (2007). Virtual Linguistic Lab (VLL) Child Multilingualism Questionnaire. Virtual Center for Language Acquisition, Cornell University. http://www.clal.cornell.edu/vcla (retrieved October 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Yang, S., & Lust, B. (2005). Testing effects of bilingualism on executive attention: Comparison of cognitive performance on two non-verbal tests. BUCLD 29 Proceedings Online Supplement. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. http://www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp29.html (retrieved October 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Yang, S., & Lust, B. (2007). Cross-linguistic differences in cognitive effects due to bilingualism: Experimental study of lexicon and executive attention in 2 typologically distinct language groups. BUCLD 31 Proceedings (vol. 2), pp. 602703. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yang, S., Yang, H., & Lust, B. (2011). Examining the bilingual advantage in a multi- dimensional executive attention construct: Evidence from the Attention Network Test. Ms., Tyndale University College.Google Scholar
117
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *