Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Tales of Emergence—Synthetic Biology as a Scientific Community in the Making

  • Susan Molyneux-Hodgson (a1) and Morgan Meyer (a2)

This article locates the beginnings of a synthetic biology network and thereby probes the formation of a potential disciplinary community. We consider the ways that ideas of community are mobilized, both by scientists and policy-makers in building an agenda for new forms of knowledge work, and by social scientists as an analytical device to understand new formations for knowledge production. As participants in, and analysts of, a network in synthetic biology, we describe our current understanding of synthetic biology by telling four tales of community making. The first tale tells of the mobilization of synthetic biology within a European context. The second tale describes the approach to synthetic biology community formation in the UK. The third narrates the creation of an institutionally based, funded ‘network in synthetic biology’. The final tale de-localizes community-making efforts by focussing on ‘devices’ that make communities. In tying together these tales, our analysis suggests that the potential community can be understood in terms of ‘movements’—the (re)orientation and enrolment of people, stories, disciplines and policies; and of ‘stickiness’—the objects and glues that begin to bind together the various constitutive elements of community.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Anonymous (2008). Beyond the genome: The challenge of synthetic biology. BioSocieties, 3(1), 320.

S.A. Benner , & A.M. Sismour (2005). Synthetic biology. Nature Review Genetics, 6, July, 533543.

J. Calvert (2008). The commodification of emergence: Systems biology, synthetic biology and intellectual property. BioSocieties, 3, 383398.

J. Calvert , & P. Martin (2009). The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. EMBO Reports, 10, 201204.

H.M. Collins , & R.J. Evans (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: U Chicago Press.

P. Collins , & D. Pontikakis (2006). Innovation systems in the European periphery: The policy approaches of Ireland and Greece. Science and Public Policy, 33, 757769.

J.F. Conway (1992). Physics and the rise of scientific research in Canada by Yves Gingras. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 17, 224226.

D. Endy (2005). Foundations for engineering biology. Nature, 438, 24 November, 449453.

U. Felt (1993). Fabricating scientific success stories. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 375390.

M. Greener (2008). Is the grass greener on the other side? Encouraging the development of synthetic biology in Europe. EMBO Reports, 9, 835837.

I. Hacking (1983). Representing and intervening—Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

A.M. Hedgecoe (2003). Terminology and the construction of scientific disciplines: The case of pharmacogenomics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 28, 513537.

S.M. Hodgson (2006). Narrating community: History and absence in scientific texts. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31, 175188.

R. Lamb , & E. Davidson (2005). Information and communication technology challenges to scientific professional identity. The Information Society, 21, 124.

J. Lave , & E. Wenger (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

F. Lentzos , G. Bennett , J. Boeke , D. Endy , & P. Rabinow (2008). Visions and challenges in redesigning life. BioSocieties, 3, 311323.

M. Meyer (2007). Increasing the frame: Interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity and representativity. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32, 203212.

C.M. Mody (2006). Corporations, universities, and instrumental communities: Commercializing probe microscopy, 1981–1996. Technology and Culture, 47, 5680.

M.A. O'Malley , A. Powell , J.F. Davies , & J. Calvert (2007) Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology, BioEssays, 30(19): 5765.

A. Pickering (Ed.) (1992). Science as practice and culture. London: U Chicago Press.

A. Pottage (2006). Too much ownership: Bio-prospecting in the age of synthetic biology. BioSocieties, 1, 137158.

M.C. Roco , & W.S. Bainbridge (Eds.) (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

B. Simpson , & B. Carroll (2008). Re-viewing ‘role’ in processes of identity construction. Organization, 15, 2950.

D. Vinck (1999). Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique. Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales. Revue française de sociologie, 40, 385414.

E. Wenger (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225246.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1745-8552
  • EISSN: 1745-8560
  • URL: /core/journals/biosocieties
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.